Jump to content


- - - - -

Fios in Tampa


  • You cannot reply to this topic
8 replies to this topic

#1 TeamStrike

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 17 January 2006 - 06:02 AM

Got the Verizon Fios last week. since then its been pretty rock solid. no speed drops like the roadrunner. I am on 5/2 plan. my download is very good but does anyone had anyl uck with the upload, its always like 1.7 or 1.8. Its still better than the cable.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 5200 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 635 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 07:59:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.61 sec
Diagnosis: Looks Great : 10.22 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-KXGJESDRB


:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 221 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 08:00:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.63 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 187 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-X1VDAW2Q4

Recommended Download

#2 jared

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • Location: Central South Dakota

Posted 17 January 2006 - 08:17 AM

Hope you enjoy :D

Welcome to the forums! (maybe?!)

#3 kol

    TMN Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 421 posts

Posted 17 January 2006 - 09:19 AM

Quote

Got the Verizon Fios last week. since then its been pretty rock solid. no speed drops like the roadrunner. I am on 5/2 plan. my download is very good but does anyone had anyl uck with the upload, its always like 1.7 or 1.8. Its still better than the cable.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 5200 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 635 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 07:59:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.61 sec
Diagnosis: Looks Great : 10.22 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-KXGJESDRB


:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 221 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 08:00:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.63 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 187 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-X1VDAW2Q4
Good Speeds  :D

#4 amc11890

    TMN Sr. Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,503 posts
  • Location: Tampa, FL

Posted 17 January 2006 - 06:23 PM

Quote

Got the Verizon Fios last week. since then its been pretty rock solid. no speed drops like the roadrunner. I am on 5/2 plan. my download is very good but does anyone had anyl uck with the upload, its always like 1.7 or 1.8. Its still better than the cable.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 5200 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 635 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 07:59:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.61 sec
Diagnosis: Looks Great : 10.22 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-KXGJESDRB


:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 221 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 08:00:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.63 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 187 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-X1VDAW2Q4
u have any tweaks installed?

#5 TeamStrike

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 17 January 2006 - 07:40 PM

I am using cablenut tweaks
I used to have had the custom file for roadrunner but since when i got FIOS i only changed few things in there.

#6 FallowEarth

    TMN Sr. Veteran

  • Inactive Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,876 posts
  • Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 17 January 2006 - 07:51 PM

Try THIS TEST.  Post results.

#7 ZeroOne

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 84 posts
  • Location: Mobil Avenue

Posted 18 January 2006 - 06:09 PM

teamstrike, i am also in tampa and have the 5/2 plan with speeds very similar to what you posted.  I had to use cablenut to get that 1.8 upload...Ive never gotten more than that on the up. 

#8 TeamStrike

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 18 January 2006 - 06:38 PM

Quote

Try THIS TEST.  Post results.


SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

TCP properties for IP = 72.64.136.251 ()
Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5
Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.
TCP options string = 020405ac0103030301010402
MTU = 1492
MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
MSS = 1452
MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.
Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 513920
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6)
Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63888 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 20556.8 kbps (2569.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 8222.72 kbps (1027.84 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 59 hops

TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240)

Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control)
Delay = 1 (low delay)
Throughput = 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
Cost = 0 (normal cost)
Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero)

DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873.

#9 dlewis23

    TMN Seasoned Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,173 posts
  • Location: Florida

Posted 18 January 2006 - 07:33 PM

thats a nice speed you got there.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users