Jump to content


AMD or Intel?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
69 replies to this topic

Poll: AMD or Intel? (83 member(s) have cast votes)

AMD or Intel?

  1. AMD (45 votes [54.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 54.22%

  2. Intel (37 votes [44.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.58%

  3. Both (1 votes [1.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.20%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 ghostmaster

    Expert

  • Sophist Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Location: Sharing a cigarette with negativity...

Posted 30 April 2008 - 07:03 PM

AMD has to stay.  Lack of competition breeds apathy....

Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.

#62 TimPawlak

    TMN Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,574 posts
  • Location: Central Indiana

Posted 30 April 2008 - 07:33 PM

I'm still an AMD fan, but since my recent build with a core 2 duo, it killed my old AMD rig...

#63 tommie gorman

    TMN Seasoned Veteran

  • Sophist Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,961 posts
  • Location: western missouri

Posted 30 April 2008 - 08:05 PM

Quote

AMD has to stay.  Lack of competition breeds apathy....

Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.

Quote

AMD has to stay.  Lack of competition breeds apathy....

Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
Thats the one.  :afro:

#64 dlewis23

    TMN Seasoned Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,178 posts
  • Location: Florida

Posted 30 April 2008 - 08:47 PM

Quote

Where's my "both" option? lol...depends for me...If AMD makes a Quad Core then AMD all the way but untill then INTEL baby!

AMD has had a quad core for a long time now. And it pretty much sucks. They are nothing compared to the core 2 quad or xeon 5400 series.

#65 RTB

    TMN Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 2,268 posts
  • Location: The land of weed

Posted 01 May 2008 - 04:17 AM

Quote

AMD has had a quad core for a long time now. And it pretty much sucks. They are nothing compared to the core 2 quad or xeon 5400 series.
The irony is that Phenom does fine clock for clock, and certainly has the advantage in bandwidth-limited programs. But the clock speed defiency is just too much, 2.4 Ghz or whereabouts, where Intel does 3 at stock, and 4 OCed.

#66 xs1

    TMN QOS Tester

  • Moderators
  • 4,308 posts
  • Location: Sarasota, Florida

Posted 01 May 2008 - 05:29 AM

Im gunna say intel now-a-days.  i <3 my quad

#67 justinlay

    Expert

  • News Anchor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,448 posts
  • Location: Texas

Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:42 AM

Intel all the way!! Love my Quad

#68 3DG3

    Jr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Location: Davao City

Posted 01 May 2008 - 02:10 PM

INTEL!!!! no more no less!!!!  :angel:

#69 resopalrabotnick

    TMN Seasoned Veteran

  • News Anchor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,505 posts
  • Location: Banana Republic

Posted 06 May 2008 - 04:19 PM

sad thing is amd these days isn't even good for competition. they are just running lawsuits vs intel to whine about how unfair the competition is... pansies... the top of the line intel dual cores come close to toasting amd's quad cores. never mind the intel quads...

#70 JokeyMcScrotsack

    If you go fast enough they can't tell how big it isn't.

  • Sophist Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,650 posts
  • Location: Pizza Napoli's

Posted 06 May 2008 - 04:20 PM

I like AMD ma self.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users