AMD has to stay. Lack of competition breeds apathy....
Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
AMD or Intel?
Started by mudmanc4, Apr 07 2006 02:58 PM
69 replies to this topic
#61
Posted 30 April 2008 - 07:03 PM
#62
Posted 30 April 2008 - 07:33 PM
I'm still an AMD fan, but since my recent build with a core 2 duo, it killed my old AMD rig...
#63
Posted 30 April 2008 - 08:05 PM
Quote
AMD has to stay. Lack of competition breeds apathy....
Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
Quote
AMD has to stay. Lack of competition breeds apathy....
Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
Thats why everytime AMD releases something new, Intel crushes it before AMD can even mass produce it.
#64
Posted 30 April 2008 - 08:47 PM
Quote
Where's my "both" option? lol...depends for me...If AMD makes a Quad Core then AMD all the way but untill then INTEL baby!
AMD has had a quad core for a long time now. And it pretty much sucks. They are nothing compared to the core 2 quad or xeon 5400 series.
#65
Posted 01 May 2008 - 04:17 AM
Quote
AMD has had a quad core for a long time now. And it pretty much sucks. They are nothing compared to the core 2 quad or xeon 5400 series.
#66
Posted 01 May 2008 - 05:29 AM
Im gunna say intel now-a-days. i <3 my quad
#67
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:42 AM
Intel all the way!! Love my Quad
#68
Posted 01 May 2008 - 02:10 PM
INTEL!!!! no more no less!!!!
#69
Posted 06 May 2008 - 04:19 PM
sad thing is amd these days isn't even good for competition. they are just running lawsuits vs intel to whine about how unfair the competition is... pansies... the top of the line intel dual cores come close to toasting amd's quad cores. never mind the intel quads...
#70
Posted 06 May 2008 - 04:20 PM
I like AMD ma self.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













