i talked to an insightbb rep on insightbb.com and they said these upgrades are being made to get away from AT&T and we will be upgraded for free to 6/512 after the backbones are finished *they said hopefully in 2 weeks* for the same price as we paied for the 4/384 package *like 30 per month* and the next package up will be 10/1 for the same price as the next price up was.. i think 60.00 per month.
Thanks, Tim
1
5 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Moderators
-
- 7,105 posts
TMN Seasoned Veteran
- Location: Kentucky
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:07 AM
Cool if they are going to do that in all their markets. I knew something like that was going to happen in Indiana & Illinois, but not sure about Kentucky.
#3
-
- Members
-
- 1,574 posts
TMN Veteran
- Location: Central Indiana
Posted 27 May 2006 - 12:21 PM
yup, i am soo excited.. they said the upgrade will ake place in 2< weeks i am trying to help them sort their problems out. *they are letting a 14 yr old help them 
*
Thanks, Tim
PS coknuck-- we will finally have faster upload/downloads!! * i have the 4/384 also but get like 6.5 for down and 340 for upload
*Thanks, Tim
PS coknuck-- we will finally have faster upload/downloads!! * i have the 4/384 also but get like 6.5 for down and 340 for upload
#4
-
- Members
-
- 1,574 posts
TMN Veteran
- Location: Central Indiana
Posted 27 May 2006 - 12:22 PM
i am wondering if i will get around 9 ish mbit download since i get over what i am supposed to now
#5
-
- Sophist Member
-
- 12,961 posts
TMN Seasoned Veteran
- Location: western missouri
Posted 27 May 2006 - 12:44 PM
Lucky dogs. 
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
#6
-
- Members
-
- 1,574 posts
TMN Veteran
- Location: Central Indiana
Posted 27 May 2006 - 12:53 PM
heck yes!
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 6095 Kbps about 6.1 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB)
Download Speed is:: 744 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.timpawlak.isaf.us/downloads
Test Time:: 2006/05/27 - 12:48pm
Bottom Line:: 106X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.38 sec
Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 4.236 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 65.4 % faster than the average for host (insightBB.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-BIWXEQAZD
i have always had this kind of speed...
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 369 Kbps about 0.37 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/27 - 12:51pm
Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 22.76 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 12.84384 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2)
Diagnosis: Looks Great : 6.34 % faster than the average for host (insightBB.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-SU6O958IK
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 6095 Kbps about 6.1 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB)
Download Speed is:: 744 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.timpawlak.isaf.us/downloads
Test Time:: 2006/05/27 - 12:48pm
Bottom Line:: 106X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.38 sec
Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 4.236 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 65.4 % faster than the average for host (insightBB.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-BIWXEQAZD
i have always had this kind of speed...
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 369 Kbps about 0.37 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/27 - 12:51pm
Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 22.76 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 12.84384 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2)
Diagnosis: Looks Great : 6.34 % faster than the average for host (insightBB.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-SU6O958IK
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
