Quote
help deciding if this is worth it...
#21
Posted 25 June 2006 - 06:47 PM

#22
Posted 25 June 2006 - 06:50 PM
#23
Posted 25 June 2006 - 06:55 PM
Quote
#24
Posted 25 June 2006 - 07:09 PM
Quote
thanks,
starship troopers
you could possable upgrade to a dvd burner in there. but a newer video card is a no.
#25
Posted 25 June 2006 - 07:12 PM
Quote
#26
Posted 27 June 2006 - 12:07 PM
thanks,
starship troopers
#27
Posted 29 June 2006 - 01:33 PM
I have a old 750 MHz Dell insp. which I use on the road , and a couple of flash memory pens, do you relay need a DVD recorder ? I have upgraded the bat. and get about 3.1/2 hours run time, it has a partitioned hard drive , with a shadow copy on the 2nd partion, I use it to help people to get back on line and check out programs etc , when it goes tits up,
I just recover back to the shadow copy , and start again, LOL , It works for me so don't laugh ,
I think you need to think what the laptop is realy going to be used for,
do you really want to spend serious money on it , personally I have more pressing needs, and would rather upgrade my desktop,
But I guess that is your call , the acer sounds good to me, but what do I know
P.s wellcome from Roco UK
#28
Posted 29 June 2006 - 06:44 PM
Quote
I have a old 750 MHz Dell insp. which I use on the road , and a couple of flash memory pens, do you relay need a DVD recorder ? I have upgraded the bat. and get about 3.1/2 hours run time, it has a partitioned hard drive , with a shadow copy on the 2nd partion, I use it to help people to get back on line and check out programs etc , when it goes tits up,
I just recover back to the shadow copy , and start again, LOL , It works for me so don't laugh ,
I think you need to think what the laptop is realy going to be used for,
do you really want to spend serious money on it , personally I have more pressing needs, and would rather upgrade my desktop,
But I guess that is your call , the acer sounds good to me, but what do I know
P.s wellcome from Roco UK
just one more thing...whats the major difference in FAT32 and NTFS? i always use NTFS.
thanks,
starship troopers
#29
Posted 29 June 2006 - 07:35 PM
The major difference between NTFS and FAT32 is NTFS supports more security. FAT32 is able to share files but NTFS is able to allow or deny to users or groups of users. NTFS also can allow you to use the NTFS file permissions even to the local machine if it has multiple users. FAT32 is a little quicker performance wise. If originally formated to FAT32 you can always convert to NTFS. However, you will not be able to go from NTFS to FAT32. The only real reason I see anyone running FAT32 anymore is for dual booting purposes, such as running both Win98 and Windows XP on one PC. NTFS also supports encryption of files. There may be more reasons and would be interested in others responses. I hope I responded well, first response for me.
#30
Posted 29 June 2006 - 08:41 PM
But it uses NTFS for eveything else.
#31
Posted 30 June 2006 - 04:39 AM
#32
Posted 30 June 2006 - 06:31 AM
Quote
The major difference between NTFS and FAT32 is NTFS supports more security. FAT32 is able to share files but NTFS is able to allow or deny to users or groups of users. NTFS also can allow you to use the NTFS file permissions even to the local machine if it has multiple users. FAT32 is a little quicker performance wise. If originally formated to FAT32 you can always convert to NTFS. However, you will not be able to go from NTFS to FAT32. The only real reason I see anyone running FAT32 anymore is for dual booting purposes, such as running both Win98 and Windows XP on one PC. NTFS also supports encryption of files. There may be more reasons and would be interested in others responses. I hope I responded well, first response for me.
you mised 1 major point Fat32 will only support up to 32GB NTFS will support up to 2TB. thats the major difference.
#33
Posted 30 June 2006 - 07:01 AM
#34
Posted 30 June 2006 - 07:04 AM
You can partition FAT32 up to 2TB to use with WinXP, you just have to use the FDISK and Format tool on a Win98 bootdisk before starting WinXP setup.
But I personally would use NTFS, It's much more efficient and secure than FAT32.
#35
Posted 30 June 2006 - 07:34 AM
Quote
You can partition FAT32 up to 2TB to use with WinXP, you just have to use the FDISK and Format tool on a Win98 bootdisk before starting WinXP setup.
But I personally would use NTFS, It's much more efficient and secure than FAT32.
#36
Posted 30 June 2006 - 12:13 PM
Quote
I actually never have converted a drive from FAT32 to NTFS because I have read of people having a lot of problems afterwards, but you could try and see how it works for you.
My personal choice would be / boot using the WinXP CD, delete all partitions, then set any partitions you want, then format to NTFS when proceding with XP setup, just remember, that will destroy all data on the whole disk and you will be starting from scratch.
If you have XP on the laptop now, with FAT32 this is what you need to do to convert.
To find out more information about Convert.exe
1. After completing Setup, click Start, click Run, type cmd, and then press ENTER.
2. In the command window, type help convert and then press ENTER. Information about converting FAT volumes to NTFS is made available as shown below.
To convert a volume to NTFS from the command prompt
1. Open Command Prompt. Click Start, point to All Programs, point to Accessories, and then click Command Prompt.
2. In the command prompt window, type: convert drive_letter: /fs:ntfs
For example, typing convert D: /fs:ntfs would format drive D: with the ntfs format. You can convert FAT or FAT32 volumes to NTFS with this command.
Important Once you convert a drive or partition to NTFS, you cannot simply convert it back to FAT or FAT32. You will need to reformat the drive or partition which will erase all data, including programs and personal files, on the partition.
#37
Posted 30 June 2006 - 01:31 PM
backup
backup
backup
and did i mention you should have a copy of your important files before you start?
#38
Posted 30 June 2006 - 08:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














