Jump to content

100 MB Download Test. Let's Compair.


ROGMAN

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a bit faster today  :D

dont think it will go much faster then this on this route

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1

  2    3 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226

.177.2]

  3    4 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238]

  4    1 ms    <1 ms    1 ms  port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1

19.233]

  5    8 ms    1 ms    1 ms  ge1-0.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.225]

  6    24 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26]

  7    23 ms    21 ms    20 ms  pos5-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.97]

  8    21 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18

1]

  9  144 ms    38 ms  176 ms  pos13-0.cr1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.122

]

10    21 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos1-0.br1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.117.14]

11    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms  s-b3-pos6-1.telia.net [213.248.101.49]

12    21 ms    22 ms    21 ms  s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.89]

13    32 ms    32 ms    32 ms  kbn-bb1-link.telia.net [213.248.65.142]

14  137 ms  151 ms  151 ms  nyk-bb1-pos0-1-0.telia.net [213.248.64.22]

15  153 ms  134 ms  151 ms  chi-bb1-pos6-0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.153]

16  152 ms  151 ms  151 ms  so0-2-0-250.j2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.69]

17  153 ms  151 ms  151 ms  unknown.scnet.net [216.246.50.2]

18  155 ms  151 ms  152 ms  cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2

40.37]

Trace complete.

VanBuren :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this host is very slow if you ask me cause my ping and route is great but i get horrible speeds.

C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert cachefly.com

Tracing route to cachefly.com [66.225.240.37]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    5 ms    5 ms    5 ms  10.50.192.1

  2    8 ms    7 ms    7 ms  dstswr1-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.33]

  3    7 ms    6 ms    5 ms  r3-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.1]

  4    8 ms    5 ms    5 ms  r1-srp0-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.193]

  5    7 ms    7 ms    7 ms  r2-srp5-0.in.nycmnyzr.cv.net [65.19.96.56]

  6    33 ms    33 ms    33 ms  65.19.102.134

  7    28 ms    29 ms    28 ms  ge0-0-1.j2.ord.scnet.net [206.223.119.57]

  8    31 ms    29 ms    44 ms  ae1-4000m.c2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.66]

  9    34 ms    35 ms    35 ms  ae2-4000m.c1.ord.scnet.net [205.234.205.217]

10    28 ms    30 ms    29 ms  cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2

40.37]

Trace complete.

C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>ping cachefly.com -t

Pinging cachefly.com [66.225.240.37] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 66.225.240.37:

    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 29ms

Control-C

^C

C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>

all of this is BS if you ask me cause they are really slow compared to testmy.net  and claim to be faster than this host which they are not cause i am proof and have tests to prove it.

The networks chosen all have multi-gigabit connectivity, a great reputation and strong SLA's. But how do they stack up on latency, the bottleneck in real-world tcp performance?

The provider with the lowest latency is highlighted for each city on Level3's Network

City CacheFly RackSpace HostWay The Planet Interland

Atlanta, GA 12ms 32ms 20ms 20ms 28ms

Baltimore, MD 1ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms

Boston, MA 8ms 56ms 20ms 40ms 24ms

Chicago, IL 1ms 36ms 12ms 36ms 28ms

Cincinnati, OH 4ms 36ms 12ms 40ms 36ms

Cleveland, OH 8ms 44ms 16ms 40ms 20ms

Charlotte, NC 16ms 36ms 24ms 24ms 32ms

Dallas, TX 32ms 4ms 36ms 1ms 32ms

Denver, CO 24ms 20ms 24ms 16ms 44ms

Detroit, MI 4ms 40ms 4ms 44ms 36ms

FIX-West NAP San Jose 1ms 60ms 56ms 44ms 76ms

Garden City, NY 8ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 16ms

Houston, TX 36ms 12ms 40ms 20ms 40ms

Los Angeles, CA 12ms 48ms 68ms 32ms 68ms

Las Vegas, NV 16ms 52ms 44ms 32ms 78ms

Miami, FL 28ms 44ms 32ms 32ms 40ms

Newark, NJ 4ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms

New York, NY 4ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms

Oakland, CA 1ms 64ms 60ms 44ms 76ms

Orlando, FL 24ms 56ms 28ms 28ms 36ms

Philadelphia, PA 4ms 52ms 24ms 36ms 20ms

Phoenix, AZ 20ms 48ms 60ms 24ms 64ms

Raleigh, NC 4ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 20ms

Richmond, VA 8ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 16ms

Sacramento, CA 4ms 60ms 64ms 44ms 80ms

San Antonio, TX 40ms 16ms 48ms 8ms 40ms

San Diego, CA 12ms 48ms 64ms 28ms 68ms

Seattle, WA 20ms 64ms 48ms 40ms 72ms

San Francisco, CA 1ms 60ms 56ms 44ms 76ms

San Jose, CA 1ms 60ms 64ms 44ms 76ms

Salt Lake City, UT 24ms 52ms 36ms 24ms 56ms

Saint Louis, MO 4ms 32ms 4ms 32ms 32ms

Stamford, CT 4ms 52ms 24ms 36ms 20ms

Tampa, FL 32ms 40ms 36ms 24ms 48ms

Tustin, CA 12ms 48ms 72ms 32ms 68ms

Washington, DC 1ms 52ms 40ms 32ms 16ms

Weehawken, NJ 4ms 52ms 24ms 40ms 20ms

  CacheFly RackSpace HostWay The Planet Interland

Average Latency 12.19ms 47.22ms 35.55ms 33.25ms 43.33ms

The numbers speak for themselves - CacheFly outperformed the competition:

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

thank you for the welcome.  my isp is charter. and my speed is unlimited.  well at least limited to hardware and overhead.  i was using dap.  my ping to that link was kinda high.  so the only way to get any good speed was to use multi-thread.  while ive got the attention of an admin, everytime i try to use my speed test image on another forum i only get a link.  ive tried all three types of code?  they only support BBcode.  is there away around this?  thanx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...