I got wildblue because, i thought it was faster than dial-up...i was wrong...I use my internet to play games like RuneScape, wildblue was always really fast and then all of a sudden it started to lag really bad, i think it started around November, ever scince then i cant play RuneScape because it keeps displaying "Connection Lost, Please Wait" i was wondering if anyone could give me some help telling me how to make it better, or telling me what happened.
Also, i have run countless spyware/virus scans.
WildBlue LAG!
Started by Sh4d0w_st3p, Jan 02 2007 03:17 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 January 2007 - 03:17 PM

#3
Posted 02 January 2007 - 03:55 PM
i did not, thank you for showing that to me.
#4
Posted 02 January 2007 - 04:23 PM
#5
Posted 02 January 2007 - 04:33 PM
Don't forget that a satelite signal has to travel 22,??? miles up into the sky and back, so that is where part of the lag comes from. And you know they will have some pretty decent excuses for you. Good luck with it.
#6
Posted 02 January 2007 - 04:36 PM
Quote
i did not, thank you for showing that to me.
#7
Posted 02 January 2007 - 04:51 PM
Well, the internet did not lag much at all before the 17th, it was as perfect as can be then..."the update" dun dun dun *screams*
yea but...lag yipee
#8
Posted 02 January 2007 - 04:52 PM
Quote
Well, the internet did not lag much at all before the 17th, it was as perfect as can be then..."the update" dun dun dun *screams*
yea but...lag yipee
have you given wildblue a call
#9
Posted 02 January 2007 - 05:03 PM
Quote
Don't forget that a satelite signal has to travel 22,??? miles up into the sky and back, so that is where part of the lag comes from. And you know they will have some pretty decent excuses for you. Good luck with it.
Everyone with Wildblue has been having serious lag issues since the firmware update in November. So, I don't think he's getting the 700ms pings and complaining.
#10
Posted 02 January 2007 - 05:09 PM
If WB indeed increased lag times in an effort to stop people from using "Big Ping", then I wouldn't expect them to do anything about it. Maybe when the WB1 sat is up and running, it will open up the bandwidth for them to reduce their excessive traffic shaping....
#11
Posted 02 January 2007 - 05:21 PM
Should've gotten HughesNet instead.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














