monkhoous Posted January 19, 2005 CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Hi ijust upgraded my service to 3000/416 and I get speeds of :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2534 Kbps about 2.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 294 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 45 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.31 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=DKA7LWSUR :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 408 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Upload Speed is:: 50 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 7 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 20.48 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=9CY1DI4Z6 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 19, 2005 CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 hey monkhoous and welcome to the forum try this file VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 19, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Thank you very much Imma try it rit now it doesnt matter that I use pppoe or not rit the settings work fine in normal and pppoe rit? Imma post the results rit after I reboot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 19, 2005 CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Thank you very much Imma try it rit now it doesnt matter that I use pppoe or not rit the settings work fine in normal and pppoe rit? Imma post the results rit after I reboot! It do matters if you using PPPoE or not PPPoE has a MTU of 1492, win XP has a bug that limit the MTU to 1480 if your not using a router other DSL has 1500 as MTU i made the file from the MTU you had on that tweaktest VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 19, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Whoa ur genius man look at my speed :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2549 Kbps about 2.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 311 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 46 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.29 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=VSNLE0I6O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 19, 2005 CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 i dont see much of improvment compared to your old score, what happend with the upload? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 19, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Thank You very very much Now i am getting even more speed i am getting around 327kb/s download, 54kb/s upload nice!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 19, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 19, 2005 Whoa do you mean I can get even better speed? If I can please do so ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 no problem also test this file VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2547 Kbps about 2.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 311 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 45 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.29 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=8JKPTYEXR Still same this is like 80% rit witch means it can get higher rit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 Hey when make those file your doing it for PPPoE rite? Cause if its not it wont work u know ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icymonkey Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 359 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 44 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 6 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 23.27 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=VBO27WR4A whats something i can do for my upload . . . it completely sucks . . ahhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 Hey when make those file your doing it for PPPoE rite? Cause if its not it wont work u know ! the files i made is for PPPoE i just named it wrong VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2547 Kbps about 2.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 311 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 45 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.29 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=8JKPTYEXR Still same this is like 80% rit witch means it can get higher rit? I dont think you will get anymore then that VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 359 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 44 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 6 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 23.27 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=VBO27WR4A whats something i can do for my upload . . . it completely sucks . . ahhh Make a new thread and post the info i ask for in that thread, just follow these steps and post again https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=605.0 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 I use Win XP SBC Yahoo DSL 3000/436 here is the url for tweak test http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:47cdded?service=dsl&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=winXPpppoe Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and Settingsulzii3>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 what happend to this https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1850.msg18046#msg18046 the RWIN is reporting wrong at tweaktest, cos your Default Recive Window is alot more... did you change anything? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 It was all same if you need anymore information from me ask so u can make that custom settings correctly. Oh ya you said to make new thread so I did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 It was all same if you need anymore information from me ask so u can make that custom settings correctly open cablenut adjuster and make a screenshot of your current settings also why did you start i new thread? I merged it to this one, and i dont think you will go faster then this VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 I didnt change anything I used the 3500/500 settings and here is the screenshot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 thanks, somehow your ISP dosent read the AFD parameters ( DefaultReciveWindow and Default Send window ) have you tested to reboot modem and router? also make a test here and copy all text you find and paste it here http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 20, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.1e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 505.91Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.48Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem click START to re-test More Details:WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1082 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 1082 CurCwnd: 116640 CurMSS: 1440 CurRTO: 560 CurRwinRcvd: 115200 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 3196800 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 2220 DupAcksIn: 0 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 116640 MaxMSS: 1440 MaxRTO: 570 MaxRTT: 370 MaxRwinRcvd: 115200 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1440 MinRTO: 280 MinRTT: 80 MinRwinRcvd: 57600 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1082 PktsOut: 2220 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 1 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 79 SampleRTT: 360 SmoothedRTT: 360 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndLimTimeRwin: 8948564 SndLimTimeCwnd: 1110099 SndLimTimeSender: 3364 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 2859840 SndLimBytesCwnd: 336960 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 371790 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 1 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 943830 Duration: 10070601 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.11>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0>2], (estimate > 2) [31.97>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [2.54>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.50<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.88>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.11>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [2.54<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [2.54>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.50<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.34=0], (speed < 5) [2.54<5] (Estimate > 50 [31.97>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.88>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [2.54<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.3432627441766955E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.88>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.11>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] bw = 31.97 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 343.61msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 31.97 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.29 Mbps Your receive buffer (112.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.55 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 2.58 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 505.91Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.48Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 343.61 msec; the Packet size = 1440 Bytes; and No packet loss was observed. This connection is receiver limited 88.93% of the time. Increasing the current receive buffer (112.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 11.03% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Statistics: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 20, 2005 CID Share Posted January 20, 2005 open cablenut adjuster click delete cablenut tweaks + save to registry and reboot now upgrade your windows XP to SP2, use windows update when its done, reload the tweak file and click save to registry and reboot good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkhoous Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 DO I really need to upgrade to sp2 cause when I did it b4 like two times when someone told me to do it i had so much problems with internet connections and accessing some webs like testing speed in testmy.net and stuff so many problems! And witch setting should I use the 3000/416 one or 3500/500 or the one from the folder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 DO I really need to upgrade to sp2 cause when I did it b4 like two times when someone told me to do it i had so much problems with internet connections and accessing some webs! And witch setting should I use the 3000/416 one or 3500/500 or the one from the folder 3000/384? and is there any other way I can get the isp to read AFD parameters Thank U try the 3000/416 first and make a speedtest, then try the 3500/500 and compare what file that works best for you. you will need SP2 http://www.broadbandnuts.com/index.php?op=articles;id=9 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.