Brand new HN7000S
#1
Posted 25 March 2008 - 01:54 PM
Also on the Vista computer my windows mail will not work. Is it possible this issue is related to the HN7000S?
#2
Posted 25 March 2008 - 04:40 PM
#3
Posted 26 March 2008 - 03:38 PM
Both computers are online. Now I have a major speed issue. Any help?
#4
Posted 26 March 2008 - 04:58 PM
Come on my fellow members. I know we can do something to increase my speed without going through the hoops that hughesnet suggest.
#5
Posted 26 March 2008 - 08:26 PM
Ping testmy.net
Do a tracrt to testmy.net
Advertised speed max.
What operating system(s) you are running.
Post all of these, then we'll have something to go by .
#6
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:20 AM
Quote
Come on my fellow members. I know we can do something to increase my speed without going through the hoops that hughesnet suggest.
Did you read this;
Quote
It would be likely to say you may need to tweak the system (dish alignment) for the new modem especially if you changed transponders. I don't remember Hughes telling anyone about this since there is really no way of knowing until after the upgrade but I do remember some having realignments after upgrades. Also sometimes it may take a day or two for the system to stabilize, it does some self adjusting.
This is the only way I know to improve your speeds after modem upgrage. It would be like changing steering parts on your car, you then do an alignment. I had to realign when I went from the 4000 to the DW7000.
#7
Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:13 AM
Quote
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Download Connection is:: 1010 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 123 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/03/27 - 11:08am
Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 8.33 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 24.258 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 3.48 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-80I1KOPDC
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13 [!]
Well now that is better. Still not what I expected but better. I could live with that speed all the time.
Ping testmy.net
Ping to testmy.net was sucessful. Average 1170ms
Do a tracrt to testmy.net
Not sure how to do a tracrt to testmy.net
Advertised speed max.
I am not sure what the advertised speed is. However I am on the Home Pro plan.
What operating system(s) you are running.
I am running Vista Home Premium. I just did a fresh install as well.
Post all of these, then we'll have something to go by .
Both computers are now connected and working fine.
#8
Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:20 AM
:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::
Download Connection is:: 1003 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Download Speed is:: 122 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 161 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 20 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/03/27 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-TJXY1GPA2
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-8GQD10I34
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13 [!]
Those results I can surely live with. Especially since this test was done at 1:15 EST. Somewhat peak time, I believe.
#9
Posted 27 March 2008 - 11:44 AM
Even though you didn't change transponders it would be best to peak out the alignment for the new modem to get the best speeds possible. It is a little time consuming meaning more time involved than your installer may do but I picked up my signal almost 10 points and peaked the cross-pol higher than it was originally.
#10
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:19 PM
#11
Posted 27 March 2008 - 01:54 PM
#12
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:01 PM
Looks like I took a nose dive. This test was done at 5pm EST.
::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 678 Kbps about 0.68 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Download Speed is:: 83 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 157 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 19 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/03/27 - 3:01pm
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-S3L4MNVGX
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-0HTDIBU1O
Here is what the test at Hughesnet shows.
March 27th, 05:03PM - 799/157 kbps
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13
#13
Posted 27 March 2008 - 07:21 PM
Quote
:::::::[size=8pt]::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 678 Kbps about 0.68 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Download Speed is:: 83 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 157 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 19 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/03/27 - 3:01pm
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-S3L4MNVGX
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-0HTDIBU1O
Here is what the test at Hughesnet shows.
March 27th, 05:03PM - 799/157 Kbps
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13
If you want to see a more accurate speed test try it at 4 or 5 in the AM. The 5PM time is generally slower because of daily traffic. Traffic slows everyone down but with satellite there seems to be more of an effect to this. If your traveling at 5mph (satellite) and drop 30% from traffic, very noticeable. If your traveling at 50mph (cable, etc) 30% isn't so noticeable.
#14
Posted 27 March 2008 - 07:34 PM
You know, more than one thing at a time running.
#15
Posted 28 March 2008 - 08:32 PM
#16
Posted 29 March 2008 - 12:01 PM
#17
Posted 29 March 2008 - 01:50 PM
Quote
In order to do it you need to see the signal and cros-pol when your at the dish. I have helped an installer who used a laptop, I have set up a PC next to the dish and finally I got an OPI to use, and that was the easyest.
#18
Posted 29 March 2008 - 01:54 PM
Ah, I have just found it. I have a number written in my notes. I believe it to be the installer cell phone. I am trying to call it now........................Had to leave a message. No idea if it is still the same person with that number. I should know soon though. If not I will have to weasel my way into a re-point for free. heheheeh
#19
Posted 29 March 2008 - 02:56 PM
#20
Posted 29 March 2008 - 07:14 PM
Quote
From everything I have read tweaks don't seem to help Vista. I really would work the sat system for speed and stability first
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













