Upload speed 90% slower????
#1
Posted 18 November 2009 - 01:53 PM
I will get some test speeds and modem data posted in a bit.
#2
Posted 19 November 2009 - 08:55 AM
#3
Posted 27 November 2009 - 05:26 AM
I really hate having techs come out though they use (their speedtest site) which usually runs about 2-3 megs faster then here and they say look you are close you are fine. I get them though because I am a member on here and do a test at least once a month so I can show them my last 100 or so tests and my speeds here and how they dropped. I don't think they like that to well I have noticed. I think I know to much for them to blow smoke up my and it upsets them when I call them on their lies.
#4
Posted 27 November 2009 - 05:44 AM
Downstream
Freq/Power: 573.000 MHz 0 dBmV
Signal to Noise Ratio: 37 dB
Modulation: QAM256
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upstream
Freq/Power: 37.400 MHz 43 dBmV
Channel Type: DOCSIS 1.x (TDMA)
Symbol Rate: 2560 kSym/sec
Modulation: QAM16
Status
System Uptime: 8 days 15h:42m:39s
Computers Detected: 1
CM Status: Telephony-AC Power Iso OFF Reg Complete
Time and Date: FRI NOV 27 04:41:16 2009
CM Hardware Information
System: ARRIS DOCSIS 2.0 / PacketCable 1.0 Touchstone Telephony Modem HW_REV: 04
VENDOR: Arris Interactive, L.L.C.
BOOTR: 6.03
SW_REV: 6.1.51I
MODEL: TM602G
Product Type: 00000006 010a1be2
Product Release: 00000004
Flash Part: AM29LV320MB
Download Revision: 2
Firmware Revision: 6.1.51I
Serial Number: 89JBNF8AF425994
Battery Charger FW Rev: 07.15
I hope this stuff helps you to maybe see if there is an issue? anything else you may need let me know
Here is my latest test and you can see it is way slower then my sig.
http://www.testmy.net/share2-R4ZXE8V3J&dual=yes&q2=TF705CJGZ
#5
Posted 28 November 2009 - 01:14 PM
I am familiar with ISp test tactics, in actuality, they really have to keep it this way, they will test within there network, if this shows ok, then well, chances are, it may not be on there network, although i'm sure there's instances with dns issues, routing, ect that there switches control. There is just too many variables out of anyones control when traversing outside the ISP "closest server range within there network " . And it will be faster then testing past there servers, it's more like going to the front door, pushing the door bell, and listening to see if you hear it.
#6
Posted 28 November 2009 - 01:27 PM
#7
Posted 28 November 2009 - 02:04 PM
Have you upgraded to a newer version of the firmware ? There should be something there soon after, usually they all have at least one security / basic fix firmware upgrade.
I'm just trying to find the reason for this, my thoughts are that maybe w/o you knowing , or even begin able to see, the router could be in a botnet.
So when you get the new modem, the router cannot be found because the mac addy has been changed, but it soon send out whatever there may be lurking within a setting, or even more so, somewhere a tiny little file on the machine. Even if you re install windows , and not flash the router firmware at the same time, they will ( theoretically ) just keep exchanging the file. See what I mean ? I'm not saying you need to wipe windows, just look for a newer version to the router.
#8
Posted 28 November 2009 - 02:12 PM
I thought the N was able to go 108 transfer rate or higher where the G is limited to 54??
Either way I have to have a new modem cause I am supposed to be getting the Ultra package which is 20/6 and in order to have that it has to be DOCSIS 3.0 and the one I have is only 2.0.
I did get new firmware for the router awhile back Ill look and see if there is a new one. actually I think I did see one but I needed to LAN the router to install and I forgot till now.
I'll try that and see how it goes. Thanks for trying to help I know how frustrating it can be and how many variables can cause issues sometime technology is a B**** wait till we have power grid issues and people go without electricity for months at a time or longer it be fun then
#9
Posted 28 November 2009 - 02:27 PM
I would use the most common small programs, like spybot, ( everyone will tell you something different, but Im gonna say this, there are not problems with this program, it contains little or no ads data sending ect if you chose to use it, then test assured.
Run this in safemode, more then once, make sure you set it up to run on system start one time, this way, anything that may be loaded into memory on start, is caught before it loads. See what you get.
#10
Posted 03 December 2009 - 07:46 PM
I have some stuff thet popped up on my modem what do you think this may mean looks like alot of errors to me
Date Time Event ID Event Level Description
11/21/2009 21:07 20000200 3 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out
12/3/2009 16:21 20000400 3 Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, but no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 timeout
12/3/2009 16:21 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:21 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:21 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:21 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:21 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:22 17000400 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to receive MAC SYNC frame within time-out period
12/3/2009 16:22 17000100 3 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
12/3/2009 16:23 13000401 5 ToD request sent - No Response received; CM-MAC=00-15-cf-01-9a-7a;CMTS-MAC=00-14-f1-eb-5d-7a;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=1.0
I promise I will check back sooner this time. I will also get those programs and run them too.
#11
Posted 03 December 2009 - 10:24 PM
#12
Posted 04 December 2009 - 04:51 AM
Can you say what you said again , only different for me ? Sometimes I need a little more explainin' lol What did you do at the hub? Where is the connection, compared to where it was, same port ?
#13
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:17 AM
ya know its weird how it did it again. If I cannot find a newer firmware I am going to replace router they are pretty cheap now anyway and the one I have was given to me by a friend so its not like I am out any money plus I would like longer range in case I want to go out in the cold or in the garage.
Thanks for the help and all the advice you have given I really appreciate it. It is nice to talk with someone even if we both agree on issue it makes me feel like I am not going nutzoid. I talk to myself all the time but it confuses my Girlfriend she thinks I am talking to her or someone else is here.
#14
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:53 AM
I never bypassed the router after I did the wire thing but look at this. I am sure my upload is faster than shown cause I noticed it hasitated for a sec I got 30Meg down and 12 meg up from the comcast site wich is alwasy high but that amazed me plus I never seen a 266?? size file download on here before all the higher i ever seen was 12228
so I did the firmware if it is still no good I a shopping for a new router for sure. I guess I can get the speed with a 2.0 I was told I would be better off getting a 3.0 though
#15
Posted 04 December 2009 - 10:11 AM
#16
Posted 04 December 2009 - 10:25 AM
#17
Posted 04 December 2009 - 01:45 PM
#18
Posted 04 December 2009 - 02:30 PM
Quote
#19
Posted 04 December 2009 - 04:42 PM
I had to basically learn from scratch again and I still havent caught up yet.
A little closer though I am only 1 operating system behind now. I do have Vista 64 plexiglass edition
#20
Posted 05 December 2009 - 06:45 AM
I have been out of the game for so long I have no Idea what is good and what isn't anymore. I know Netgear at the time was just pulling out of the crappy equipment catagory I believe Cisco was high end and I think they still are. Linksis was here and there depending on the model and the sense of the person using it.
I have seen some Belkin ones one had a good review and one had the weirdest reviews I have ever seen it was either they loved it and it worked perfect or it was Junk and never worked since they unpacked it. I seen about 30+ of those for 1 router and I believe it was pretty much 50/50 but there was no middle where they liked it a little but had some issues it was best thing since sliced bread or Jink dont get it doesnt power up lol. I thought those reviews were really funny.
I can't seem to find anything under $85.00 that is in stock in store. they are all outa stock or online only or outlet Items. I am going to go with either N or N+ router. I can get 200-300 Mbps transfer use my USB HD as a network drive and connect the 2 AIO printers adn the 2 Normal printers in the network and chose which one I want to print with or scan from etc.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













