sharing

[mark shaver]

https://testmy.net/quickstats/mark%20shaver

[CA3LE]

Did you install any new programs recently that could be caching your webpages.  You can't be that fast.

 

Do you have another computer on the same connection or different browser you can try?

[mark shaver]

Fast??? chuckling i get  a lot of msg .. saying server took too long to respond.. i also notice depending on file size affects speed..

 you  mean slow.. don't you??....custom built 990 rev.2 sabertooth am3/8350/8g ram/r9furygraphic card/windows10/it may not

be top of the line system/ but everything is kept updated for optimal performance/google chrome search is my browser.. on going problem

for over8yr.s

[mudmanc4]

What cache ;

[mark shaver]

L1 data cache size 8x16 KBytes

L1 Instructions cache size 4x64 KBytes

L2 Unified Cache  size 4x2048 KBytes

L3 Unified Cache size 8192 KBytes

 not sure if this is what you are looking for..

[mark shaver]

i hope i'm doing this right

 

https://testmy.net/rt/mark%20shaver?idq=7&limitR=25

 

[mark shaver]

   x  https://testmy.net/quickstats/mark%20shaver

Details

  Hide / Include Selected

5/17/16 @ 5:09:20 am : Dallas, TX - 486 ms  

5/16/16 @ 6:56:33 am : Dallas, TX - 422 ms  

5/16/16 @ 6:55:49 am : Dallas, TX - 492 ms  

5/15/16 @ 6:26:20 pm : Dallas, TX - 543 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:26:12 pm : Dallas, TX - 504 ms  

5/15/16 @ 4:21:59 pm : Dallas, TX - 490 ms  

5/15/16 @ 1:16:23 pm : Dallas, TX - 468 ms  https://testmy.net/quickstats/mark%20shaver

5/15/16 @ 12:10:58 pm : Dallas, TX - 526 ms  

5/15/16 @ 11:05:43 am : Dallas, TX - 468 ms  

5/15/16 @ 10:00:51 am : Dallas, TX - 475 ms  

5/15/16 @ 7:49:20 am : Dallas, TX - 434 ms  

5/15/16 @ 6:44:21 am : Dallas, TX - 464 ms  

5/15/16 @ 6:03:33 am : Dallas, TX - 436 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:42:01 am : Dallas, TX - 472 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:36:07 am : Dallas, TX - 497 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:35:41 am : Dallas, TX - 503 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:35:26 am : Dallas, TX - 522 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:33:31 am : Dallas, TX - 506 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:32:41 am : Dallas, TX - 489 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:30:57 am : Dallas, TX - 475 ms  

5/15/16 @ 5:30:35 am : Dallas, TX - 421 ms  

5/14/16 @ 2:16:42 pm : Dallas, TX - 544 ms  

5/14/16 @ 1:16:41 pm : Dallas, TX - 507 ms  

5/14/16 @ 12:12:05 pm : Dallas, TX - 610 ms  

5/14/16 @ 10:10:27 am : Dallas, TX - 432 ms  

[mark shaver]

https://testmy.net/quickstats/mark%20shaver

Edited May 19, 2016 by mark shaver
have know idea if i'm doing this right..

[mark shaver]

Been trying to copy and share the URL(my rsults) to Hughes.net forums they say they are not getting them...could 

someone please make this point and click drag work- - tried to copy files to a folder on the desktop doesn't work

if they can't get the results soon they are going to close our case.. i'll be ever stuck in the slow zone/ endless buffering cycle

[mudmanc4]

What type of file will they accept?

[Gabe1972]

On ‎5‎/‎22‎/‎2016 at 10:07 AM, mudmanc4 said:

What type of file will they accept?

It's not that they aren't coming across on the forum...they are.  Mark is posting the results URL, but what we are seeing is what you are seeing and what Mark posted at the top.  Something is definitely wrong and we (I'm just a forum member, I don't work for Hughesnet) are trying to figure out why the latest results are so incredibly skewed.  The speeds results the table is showing are impossible with Hughesnet.  He says that he's not seeing during the testing what we are all seeing from the results.  We can't figure out what's going on.  Whether the tests are actually using 200MB is a little hard to determine as we are having a little bit of a hard time with communication (he's VERY new to computers, so it's a learning experience), but one thing is for sure and that is that the 500MB+ results are erroneous.  The last I remember Mark suggested he was going to record a video of him doing a test so we could see what he's seeing, but I haven't seen that yet.  I think the original issue was slow speeds.  I've never seen anything happen like what's happening with his speed tests, so I'm at a loss.  The speeds with the few tests that appeared to work seem fine.  He's getting from 63% to 96% of the "up to 10MB" speeds in those tests.  As for the others...obviously incorrect results.

[mudmanc4]

@Gabe1972 I understand.

There appears to be caching going on somewhere between the ISP and his computer.

Have him delete the individual results in his database here at testmy.net 

 

Select the test result from the checkbox on the right, then hit the red 'X'

[Gabe1972]

mudmanc4,

I gave him the suggestion in the Hughesnet thread and explained it step by step.  We'll see what happens.  Thanks for the help.