Jump to content


Siryak

Member Since 19 Jan 2007
Offline Last Active Oct 04 2010 05:53 PM
-----

Topics I've Started

LOL! "Some see racist theme in alien adventure 'Avatar'"

11 January 2010 - 10:02 PM

http://movies.yahoo....nture-avatar-ap

Wow is all I can say lol.  :2funny:

WOW! This new technology looks truly amazing!!!!

25 February 2008 - 05:45 PM

http://www.betanews....ears/1203980595

Take a look at the article above. Now that is some VERY awesome technology.

Gizoogle!!!

07 December 2007 - 02:23 PM

Lol I got a kick out of this site. It basically translate everything into hard core slang lol. Here is testmy.net --- >http://sites.gizoogle.com/index2.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftestmy.net

The home site is www.gizoogle.com

WOW! I think I just set a record for worst pings ever!

17 July 2007 - 11:05 AM

Go ahead and beat em. I dare you! :knuppel2:


Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=4439ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=3269ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2916ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1508ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=9901ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2339ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1651ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2668ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1713ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1657ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1296ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1620ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1282ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2098ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1414ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1434ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1393ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1454ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1509ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1367ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1360ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1268ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1397ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1550ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1546ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=3346ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1592ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1293ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1544ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2995ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2648ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1703ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1630ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1041ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1421ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1763ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1304ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1687ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=741ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=918ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1397ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1457ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1193ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1236ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1827ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1354ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1747ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2355ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1248ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1079ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=7856ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=3436ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1767ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1905ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2204ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=5712ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=4377ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=8690ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=22537ms TTL=47
Request timed out.
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=4594ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1270ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1273ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=5847ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1467ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1591ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1439ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1429ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1208ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1561ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1286ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=5064ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=3814ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1463ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
    Packets: Sent = 74, Received = 73, Lost = 1 (1% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 741ms, Maximum = 22537ms, Average = 2552ms

Now tell me those pings don't give you the chills!!! :icon_pale:

HP fans use CPU usage instead of temperature?

03 July 2007 - 08:44 AM

I have noticed from day one that my fan speed is varying constantly. Well today I think I figured out why. It looks like instead of using the temperature to adjust the fan speed, they instead have it adjust by processor usage. For example if it goes up to 100% the fan goes to 100%. Then every time it drops off in usage the fan drops and vise versa. My guess would be they did this to cut the cost of having something to monitor the temperature? I have never heard of them using the CPU usage to determine fan speed though lol.