ajb62787

It won't work unless I know the command line. Vista was once in Drive C then I made a new partition for XP and somehow they got switched and Vista got deleted from the boot. I can boot to vista only if I know what is the command line for Vista as mentioned above.

Does anyone know the command line to pick up Vista on my primary XP machine. e.g. [boot loader] timeout=30 default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)WINDOWS [operating systems] multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect I want to know which part I want to change and add to include XP and Vista on my machine. My primary hard drive have 3 partitions C: XP D : Vista E: Empty

So wait.. what did you do over the christmas and new year holidays besides opening gifts and "partying" for you to forget what is on your own computer

it is an alternative to Vista. It cleans out the bugs and adds extra support.

Only XP Pro is on the list for boot. Somehow, when I had a power failure a while back, it deleted Vista boot out of my computer but the Vista OS is still on the hard drive.

Let me start it off by saying that XP SP3 is smooth straight through. No problems at all.

I have Windows Vista and Windows XP on my machine on 2 seperate partitions and I can not get the boot option at startup anymore. Is there something missing from the Vista partition that it only boots into XP and not give me the choice?

Is there a program in equalivant to Windows Vista experience index score that can be used for XP based on hardware ratings like 3D Mark and Sandra07.

Is there a way where I can find out my Windows Experience Index Score on Windows XP without having to do it on Windows Vista?

That phone had been out since December, 2006 from recent review.

So whats the results lol I'm shaking in my boxers over here

There is one? Because they are some themes and extensions that I would like to use but they require Firefox 2.0.0.7 and not 3.0a8 . Plus another thing, I'm just testing it for expansion to the Firefox 3 web browser in the future and I just report my findings and any mistakes to my boss then he can customize it to where it can agree with the network that we run it on. Firefox 3 and 2.0.0.7 worked at the same time when 3.0a6 was released, since then it doesn't do that.

http://download.mozilla.org/?product=granparadiso-alpha8&os=win&lang=en-US

The imaging server I use here at work achieved 490Mbps over 3800MB per minute. I don't have proof to show it since it was imaging up Windows XP via Network.

I am a beta tester of Firefox 3.0 and I also have Firefox 2.0. When I installed Firefox 3.0, it replaced Firefox 2.0 even if I happened to change the destination and the file name to something else. It shows Firefox 2.0 loaded on the computer but its always pointing to 3.0 and if I do it the other way around 3.0 is pointing to 2.0. I am a computer technician and I along with over 15 of my co-workers can't figure out how that is since its basically 2 different versions.

They are both on the same hard drive

I have XP on my C Drive and Vista on my D Drive and usually whenever I boot up my computer, I can choose which one I want. One day after a power outage, this have disappeared and since then I have not been able to load up my D Drive at all to boot up Vista. Is there a way to fix this?

well what about egyptian times The Great Pyramids theories have said that aliens and UFOs help built the Pyramids in Egypt. Just a humorous picture http://www.k3pgp.org/seti/aliens.jpg

For proof, this is a picture that was taken onboard a plane at O'Hare Airport of the UFO http://farm1.static.flickr.com/132/351112882_537885f5a9.jpg and this one of the UFO after it punctured a hole in the clouds http://ufosightings.ca/images/07-02-Feb/chicago-ohare-ufo-puncture.jpg

Its tough to tell if they were really aliens or crash test dummies if you put US Government and Aliens all in the same sentence. After all the denials of Aliens and UFOs in the U.S. itself, who is it to believe that the O'Hare UFO story is really real after all. To me, I believe that the O'Hare UFO sighting really did happen because it scared employees there to have an anxiety attack and ask for time off from work because they were scared to death when they saw it first hand. For it to burn a 1/4 mile hole in the clouds over the airport that day, not even an airplane could do that. Explain that to me and explain how come the US Goverment says Area 51 is "non-existant" This may be a crazy picture but http://www.rotten.com/library/cryptozoology/aliens/aliens1.jpg

The main UFO report that sparks all U.S. citizens happened 60 years ago but whether it was a real UFO or a weather balloon we'll never know. As for alien species, it was made clear that an alien was found dead in Roswell.

Pause the video at the 7 second mark and look below the big white ball of light

Nope you are right this was posted on Baltimore Sun's website August 23rd http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/custom/today/bal-to.ufo23aug23,0,7227676.story?track=rss Title is : YouTube UFO videos identified as hoaxes Animator created images for film research. I'm sorry but it seemed like in 1 way it looked real but it was a way for the person to collect money for his/her work only to find out its computer animated But about 7 years ago, there was word that a UFO was spotted over Baltimore,MD and I happened to spot it myself. It was hovering at about 20,000-30,000 feet around 8-10pm for about 10 minutes and then it accelerated at a high rate of speed into space.

See it for yourself and tell if its really a UFO or not http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1006571&fr= I should say it may be because NOT: 1. it doesn't spin in a clockwise or counter-clockwise motion IS: if you happen to pause it once the bottom part of the UFO is over the house, you can look at it and if you look at the bottom part, you could see a Alien design face . Weird eh? Tell me what you think

A Few Suggestions: Newegg and Tiger Direct Customers have rated that processor one of the worst made processor by AMD since the Athlon XP series by reviews. -- Uses too much electricity compared to the lower 5600+ uses 120 watts compared to 90 or lower with the 5600+ -- Gets too F'g hot even with the best heatsink and like 5 fans in your computer -- One customer said it was so hot that the bottom of the heatsink melted and caused his processor to be stuck to the heatsink. --- Not in the range of overclocking. Better off with the 5600+ I know its like 0.2 GHz lower than the 6000+ but work with the 5600+ to see what you get out of that or go with the FX series of processors. Here is one review from Newegg: Dated July 29th, 2007 Pros: very fast, large memory cache, easy on the wallet. Cons: i have installed many cpu chips before and have never had a problem w/them 'welding" to the heat sink. well now i have! i pulled my heat sink off today just to find out my chip came out w/it. so yes, maybe the chip is nice, but the heat sink included w/the chip is certainly faulty. but unless u want to void the warranty, you have to use the included faulty heat sink. go figure: However, AMD just released the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 3.2 GHz http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103191. Its a little pricy at $279 but wait till November and it will be less than $200