ajb62787

It won't work unless I know the command line. Vista was once in Drive C then I made a new partition for XP and somehow they got switched and Vista got deleted from the boot. I can boot to vista only if I know what is  the command line for Vista  as mentioned above.

Does anyone know the command line to pick up Vista on my primary XP machine.

e.g.

[boot loader]

timeout=30

default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)WINDOWS

[operating systems]

multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect

I want to know which part I want to change and add to include XP and Vista on my machine.

My primary hard drive have 3 partitions    C:  XP   D :  Vista E: Empty

To tell you the truth I forgot I even installed it till I seen this post.

So wait..  what did you do over the christmas and new year holidays besides opening gifts and "partying" for you to forget what is on your own computer 

it is an alternative to Vista. It cleans out the bugs and adds extra support.

Only XP Pro is on the list for boot. Somehow, when I had a power failure a while back, it deleted Vista boot  out of my computer  but the Vista OS is still on the hard drive.

Let me start it off  by saying  that XP SP3 is smooth straight through. No problems at all.

I have Windows Vista and Windows XP on my machine on 2 seperate partitions and I can not get the boot option at startup anymore. Is there something missing from the Vista partition  that it only boots into XP and not give me the choice?

no..

MS has a tool that will tell you if you can run vista for XP but it doesn't give you the score.

Is there a program in equalivant to Windows Vista experience index score that can be used for XP    based on hardware ratings like  3D Mark and Sandra07.

Is there a way where I can find out my Windows Experience Index Score on Windows XP without having to do it on Windows Vista?

That phone had been out since December, 2006 from recent review.

So whats the results lol I'm shaking in my boxers over here   

I am curious as to why you would be asking a question like that, here instead of at the development forum for firefox 3.  I also use v3 but then I do my testing in Altiris Or VMWare.

There is one?   Because they are some themes and extensions that I would like to use but they require Firefox 2.0.0.7 and not 3.0a8 . Plus another thing, I'm just testing it for expansion to the Firefox 3 web browser in the future   and I just report my findings and any mistakes to my boss  then he can customize it  to where it can agree with the network that we run it on.

Firefox 3 and 2.0.0.7 worked at the same time when 3.0a6 was released, since then  it doesn't do that.

http://download.mozilla.org/?product=granparadiso-alpha8&os=win&lang=en-US

The imaging server I use here at work achieved 490Mbps    over  3800MB per minute. I don't have proof to show it since it was imaging up Windows  XP  via Network.

I am a beta tester of Firefox 3.0 and I also have Firefox 2.0. When I installed Firefox 3.0, it replaced Firefox 2.0 even if I happened to change the destination and the file name to something else.  It shows Firefox 2.0 loaded on the computer but its always pointing to 3.0 and if I do it the other way around    3.0 is pointing to 2.0.  I am a computer technician and I along with over 15 of my co-workers can't figure out how that is since its basically 2 different versions.

is it on the same hard drive or seperate?

They are both on the same hard drive

I have XP on my C Drive and Vista on my D Drive    and usually  whenever I boot up my computer, I can choose which one I want. One day  after a power outage, this have disappeared and since then  I have not been able to load up my D Drive at all to boot up Vista. Is there a way to fix this?

well what about egyptian times    The Great Pyramids    theories have said that  aliens and UFOs help built the Pyramids in Egypt.

Just a humorous picture  http://www.k3pgp.org/seti/aliens.jpg

For proof, this is a picture that was taken onboard a plane at O'Hare Airport of the UFO  http://farm1.static.flickr.com/132/351112882_537885f5a9.jpg  and this one of the UFO after it punctured a hole in the clouds http://ufosightings.ca/images/07-02-Feb/chicago-ohare-ufo-puncture.jpg

Its tough to tell if they were really aliens or crash test dummies  if you put US Government and Aliens all in the same sentence. After all the denials of Aliens and UFOs in the U.S. itself, who is it to believe that the O'Hare UFO story is  really real after all. To me, I believe that the O'Hare UFO sighting really did happen because it scared employees there to have an anxiety attack and ask for time off from work because they were scared to death when they saw it first hand. For it to burn a  1/4 mile hole in the clouds over the airport that day, not even an airplane could do that. Explain that to me  and explain how come the US Goverment says  Area 51 is "non-existant"

This may be a crazy picture but  http://www.rotten.com/library/cryptozoology/aliens/aliens1.jpg

The main  UFO report that sparks all U.S. citizens happened 60 years ago  but whether it was a real UFO or a weather balloon    we'll never know. As for alien species, it was made clear that an alien was found dead in Roswell.

whats an Alien face design ?  I think that answers the question

Pause the video at the 7 second mark and look below the big white ball of light

Nope you are right      this was posted on Baltimore Sun's website August 23rd  http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/custom/today/bal-to.ufo23aug23,0,7227676.story?track=rss    Title is : YouTube UFO videos identified as hoaxes    Animator created images for film research.

I'm sorry  but it seemed like in 1 way it looked real  but it was a way for the person to collect money for his/her work only to find out its computer animated

But about 7 years ago, there was word that a UFO was spotted over Baltimore,MD  and I happened to spot it myself.  It was hovering at about 20,000-30,000 feet  around 8-10pm  for about 10 minutes  and then it accelerated at a high rate of speed  into space.

See it for yourself and tell if its really a UFO  or not

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1006571&fr=

I should say  it may be because    NOT:  1. it doesn't spin in a clockwise or counter-clockwise motion    IS: if you happen to pause it once the bottom part of the UFO  is over the house, you can look at it  and if you look at the bottom part, you could see a Alien design face .

Weird  eh?  Tell me what you think

whats your take on this? its a 3GHz dual core cpu socket am2. here is the link. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103773&Tpk=amd%2bathlon%2b64%2bx2

other specs are this that i already have in my custom pc.

cpu 2.4GHz athlon 64 3800+ (current, want to get the 6000+)

2gigs pc6400 ADATA ram with heatspreader

512mb evga geforce 7950GT KO pci express graphics

120GB SATA 3GB/s hard drive.

acer 22" wide monitor

hipro 500watt psu

biostar tforce 550 motherboard socket am2

xp pro

btw, soon i will get another gig of ram since its only 40 bucks... and a new harddrive 160GB and vista home premium.

A Few Suggestions:

Newegg and Tiger Direct Customers have rated that processor  one of  the worst made processor by AMD since the Athlon XP series by reviews.

-- Uses too much electricity compared to the lower 5600+   uses 120 watts compared to 90 or lower with the 5600+

--  Gets too F'g  hot even with the best heatsink and like 5 fans in your computer

-- One customer said it was so hot that the bottom of the heatsink melted and caused his    processor to be stuck to the heatsink.

--- Not in the range of overclocking. Better off with the 5600+

I know its like 0.2 GHz lower than the 6000+     but work with the 5600+ to see what you get out of that   or go with the FX series of processors.

Here is one review from Newegg:  Dated July 29th, 2007

Pros: very fast, large memory cache, easy on the wallet.

Cons: i have installed many cpu chips before and have never had a problem w/them 'welding" to the heat sink. well now i have! i pulled my heat sink off today just to find out my chip came out w/it. so yes, maybe the chip is nice, but the heat sink included w/the chip is certainly faulty. but unless u want to void the warranty, you have to use the included faulty heat sink. go figure:

However,  AMD just released the AMD Athlon 64 X2  6400+  3.2 GHz http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103191.  Its a little pricy at $279  but wait till November and it will be less than $200