Jump to content

eatdirt40

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

About eatdirt40

  • Rank
    New Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. I never liked AVG. Yeah its great for antivirus i assume....But vary rarely do people actually get virus'es. Most of the time its spyware or adware, that people assume are virus'es. Which virues protection like AVG does nothing for.
  2. You may need to reformat, sometimes swapping HD's to mobo's work, sometimes it doesnt. Be prepared to format if worst case scenario happens. 420 watts should be enough, given you arent using a top top end video card.
  3. I have that same package and get nearly exact figures as you get. Theres nothing much we can do, ive tried weeks maxing this out. 1300 down and 330 up is the best we can get.
  4. Any slight speed difference for me doesnt compare up to the features firefox has over IE. (Pop-up blocker, just overall cleanliness)
  5. i have the same package. My downloads average about 158kb/sec so your right around where your sopposed to be....Ive had this package for almost a year now.
  6. Im on a 1500/384 connection. Ive tried vanbuerens cablenut settings, a few different sets of his, but to no avail, the speeds stay pretty much the same. Is it possible to get any higher? Heres my stats: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1294 Kbps about 1.29 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 158 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/03 - 9:47am Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.48 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 18.938 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 60.24 % of your hosts average (snet.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3IPQN1CH6 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 328 Kbps about 0.33 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 40 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/03 - 9:49am Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 25.6 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 14.44512 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 12.71 % faster than the average for host (snet.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RQA4KGYFP User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!]
  7. I have a lan cord, isnt that the same as an ethernet cord? Looks like a phone line head, but bigger.
  8. I dont run anything when i do my speed tests, i do my speed tests right after startup, and i turned off any program (besides explorer of course) that starts up automatically at startup.
  9. I have sbc/yahoo dsl with the 1500/384 package. I have a 2wire modem/router, which lets a computer get wireless in the other room. I had it originally hooked up with usb connecter (didnt have lan card at the time). With the usb it was tested at round 990 down. I went out and bought a lan card and used the company lan cord they supplied me with. My speed then was up at 1250 down. From just using lan instead of usb. I have been trying different tweaks on speedguide optimizer, then later onto cablenut settings.And the best ive been able to come up with is 1300 down. (currently using van buren settings). I was wondering what else i could do to get to the 1500. Would a new higher quality lan cord help? Any other finetuning settings i could try? At this point any tidbit of speed would help. Any suggestions i will try. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1301 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 159 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Sat Jul 16 18:36:09 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.44 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 0.54 % faster than the average for host (snet.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OU3AJW4Q1 Analyzer test results TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 63888 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 63888 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2555.52 kbps (319.44 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1022.208 kbps (127.776 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 52 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100 (92) Precedence (priority) = 010 (immediate) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 1 (high reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873.
×
×
  • Create New...