Jump to content

necrogoldo

Members
  • Content Count

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

About necrogoldo

  • Rank
    Jr. Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. I dont pay for the phone line, my mom does, I only pay for the DSL
  2. bueno, ya mande pal #^#%^ a onelink y ahora tengo 2Mbps/512Kbps de DMAX sin restricciones
  3. nvm my last question, it doesnt work either way, I think im screwed until next week when my DMAX modem arrives
  4. ok, done, but do I check "allow incoming legacy connections"?
  5. I'm calling tomorrow to cancel, but I still dont know if I should get the DMAX 2048/512 or the Centennial ii PD, would I get a faster "instalation" from DMAX if I still have my 2Wire modem?
  6. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 710 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 87 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/06 - 4:01pm Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 11.77 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 35.25 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N07RGOFJK man, cant we get a decent ISP in puerto rico? this is so frustrating
  7. dude, if I were you I would delete that, you can't post names of ISP employees here, someone was warned about that some time ago.
  8. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.147] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.147: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 76ms
  9. Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.99: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 82ms
  10. Tx Power 53.5 dBmV Rx Power -11.6 dBmV Downstream SNR 33.7 dB Downstream MER 31.3 dB Tx Frequency 33000000 Hz Rx Frequency 573000000 Hz can someone tell me what this means?
  11. Just Awesome :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 336 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 41 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 07 2006 22:40:22 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 24.98 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 15.41 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4CBPHE7JQ I'm in Bayamon btw
×
×
  • Create New...