Jump to content

necrogoldo

Members
  • Content Count

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by necrogoldo

  1. I dont pay for the phone line, my mom does, I only pay for the DSL
  2. bueno, ya mande pal #^#%^ a onelink y ahora tengo 2Mbps/512Kbps de DMAX sin restricciones
  3. nvm my last question, it doesnt work either way, I think im screwed until next week when my DMAX modem arrives
  4. ok, done, but do I check "allow incoming legacy connections"?
  5. I'm calling tomorrow to cancel, but I still dont know if I should get the DMAX 2048/512 or the Centennial ii PD, would I get a faster "instalation" from DMAX if I still have my 2Wire modem?
  6. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 710 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 87 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/06 - 4:01pm Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 11.77 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 35.25 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N07RGOFJK man, cant we get a decent ISP in puerto rico? this is so frustrating
  7. dude, if I were you I would delete that, you can't post names of ISP employees here, someone was warned about that some time ago.
  8. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.147] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.147: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 76ms
  9. Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.99: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 82ms
  10. Tx Power 53.5 dBmV Rx Power -11.6 dBmV Downstream SNR 33.7 dB Downstream MER 31.3 dB Tx Frequency 33000000 Hz Rx Frequency 573000000 Hz can someone tell me what this means?
  11. Just Awesome :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 336 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 41 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 07 2006 22:40:22 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 24.98 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 15.41 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4CBPHE7JQ I'm in Bayamon btw
  12. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 693 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 85 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Mon Feb 06 2006 22:19:26 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB download in 12.05 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 31.64 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XUKRNVY47 :whaa:
  13. I've had almost no problem with speed, its the P2P/bittorrent blocking that bothers me
  14. Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>tracert www.testmy.net Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 29 ms 11 ms 23 ms host-70-45-64-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.64.1] 2 128 ms 8 ms 7 ms host-70-45-94-17.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.17] 3 10 ms 17 ms 7 ms host-70-45-94-61.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.61] 4 11 ms 8 ms 12 ms host-70-45-94-101.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.101] 5 181 ms 189 ms 197 ms host-70-45-94-69.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.69] 6 * 143 ms 148 ms unk-426d0ef9.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.249] 7 151 ms 155 ms 151 ms a1-00-00-00.c0.mia95.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2 25] 8 188 ms 167 ms 168 ms p3-00-01-00.c0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.2 5] 9 183 ms 191 ms 196 ms g1-02-03-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.7 4] 10 214 ms 219 ms 235 ms eq-dallas-1000M.theplanet.com [206.223.118.3] 11 97 ms 60 ms 63 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 12 63 ms 60 ms 63 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 63 ms 70 ms 61 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6 9] 14 189 ms 181 ms 182 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete.
  15. Yea, but knowing how companies behave here in PR, I dont think they'll unblock UDP no matter what we do.
  16. well, I just called them and guess what!!!! yep, they told me the same crap they've told you guys
  17. this people better get it together, I'm so close to going with centennial ii
×
×
  • Create New...