necrogoldo

man $85 plus phone line is just too much for me for an internet service. i'm calling tomorrow and getting the 1 Mbps deal, maybe in the future ill upgrade

I dont pay for the phone line, my mom does, I only pay for the DSL

bueno, ya mande pal #^#%^ a onelink y ahora tengo 2Mbps/512Kbps de DMAX sin restricciones 

nvm my last question, it doesnt work either way, I think im screwed until next week when my DMAX modem arrives

Upgrade to 1.5, go to Network and set Protocol Encryption to Enabled.

ok, done, but do I check "allow incoming legacy connections"?

Hahaha... this is really funny. When I first started working on alpha/beta testing protocol encryption in

But why doesn't it convince you? 

I'm calling tomorrow to cancel, but I still dont know if I should get the DMAX 2048/512 or the Centennial ii 

PD, would I get a faster "instalation" from DMAX if I still have my 2Wire modem?

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 710 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 87 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/06 - 4:01pm

Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 11.77 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 35.25 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N07RGOFJK

man, cant we get a decent ISP in puerto rico? this is so frustrating

What really bugs me it

any word on when they'll unblock or unlimit bittorrent?

I bet never, thats why I hate them 

dude, if I were you I would delete that, you can't post names of ISP employees here, someone was warned about that some time ago.

C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.147] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 64.233.161.147:

    Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 76ms

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=243

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=239

Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 64.233.161.99:

    Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 82ms

Tx Power 53.5 dBmV

Rx Power -11.6 dBmV

Downstream SNR 33.7 dB

Downstream MER 31.3 dB

Tx Frequency 33000000 Hz

Rx Frequency 573000000 Hz

can someone tell me what this means? 

Just Awesome 

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 336 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 41 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

Test Time:: Tue Feb 07 2006 22:40:22 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time)

Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 24.98 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 15.41 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4CBPHE7JQ

I'm in Bayamon btw

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 693 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)

Download Speed is:: 85 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2)

Test Time:: Mon Feb 06 2006 22:19:26 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time)

Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB download in 12.05 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 31.64 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XUKRNVY47

:whaa:

well, robocop. since yopu already accused me of flaming i will now address a flame to you. you call me not 100% puerto rican. damned right. and if in your eyes i have to be 100% puerto rican i have to do silly things like protest against the navy (which was one of the few remaining reasons the US has to pump money into this place), put up with laughable utilities and horrible roads, kick and scream when the fbi finally decides to take out a leftwingnut terrorist, try to keep the island a commonwealth to enjoy free sh*t from the states instead of grabbing the chance and pushing for statehood to get most of the free stuff they already give along with an actual vote in the congress and senate instead of some resident commissioner that can do no more than beg, accept a governor that says that noone in the US is interested in doing something about the status issue (which is major league bullsh*t, since all the representatives and senators would gladly have a slice of the billions of dollars pumped here every year, so giving the island independence and letting it turn into another banana republic just like so many islands around it appeals to them. the only caveat would be the millions of puerto ricans moving to the states if that happens.), accepting a school system that sucks and doesn't teach english because of some deluded opinion on that destroying the cultural identity etc. etc. etc. then yeah, i'm damned glad not to be 100% puerto rican.

daco is a joke. it is so by law. a car dealer refuses to repair a lemon. he gets fined. he gets fined exactly 50 bucks. i wonder if he gives a sh*t.

even if daco fines onelink, the cost of the fine as opposed to the cost of doing anything about the reason for the fine beyond what they are already doing is laughable.

the transition was poorly planned and executed badly. like most things here.

i'll just wait till whenever their manana is.

I agree 100% with this post

honestly.. "me lo estan metiendo.. mongo"

a ti y a todos nosotros mi pana 

I've had almost no problem with speed, its the P2P/bittorrent blocking that bothers me 

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>tracert www.testmy.net

Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    29 ms    11 ms    23 ms  host-70-45-64-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.64.1]

  2  128 ms    8 ms    7 ms  host-70-45-94-17.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.17]

  3    10 ms    17 ms    7 ms  host-70-45-94-61.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.61]

  4    11 ms    8 ms    12 ms  host-70-45-94-101.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.101]

  5  181 ms  189 ms  197 ms  host-70-45-94-69.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.69]

  6    *      143 ms  148 ms  unk-426d0ef9.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.249]

  7  151 ms  155 ms  151 ms  a1-00-00-00.c0.mia95.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2

25]

  8  188 ms  167 ms  168 ms  p3-00-01-00.c0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.2

5]

  9  183 ms  191 ms  196 ms  g1-02-03-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.7

4]

10  214 ms  219 ms  235 ms  eq-dallas-1000M.theplanet.com [206.223.118.3]

11    97 ms    60 ms    63 ms  vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29]

12    63 ms    60 ms    63 ms  vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]

13    63 ms    70 ms    61 ms  gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6

9]

14  189 ms  181 ms  182 ms  85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85

]

Trace complete.

Yea, but knowing how companies behave here in PR, I dont think they'll unblock UDP no matter what we do. 

wat r ur advertised speeds?

3 Mbps 

well, I just called them and guess what!!!! yep, they told me the same crap they've told you guys 

Mine is.... I hate my luck 

this people better get it together, I'm so close to going with centennial ii