Jump to content

nullfied

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by nullfied

  1. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 708 Kbps about 0.71 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 86 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2006/04/29 - 10:26pm

    Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 11.91 sec

    Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 34.593 seconds to complete

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2

    Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 32.69 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DEMZ1LP59

    something IS wrong with this area... anybody from caparra with problems?

  2. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 417 Kbps about 0.42 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 51 kB/s

    Tested From:: http://insanepwning.net

    Test Time:: 2006/04/27 - 7:19pm

    Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 20.08 sec

    Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 412.407 seconds to complete

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2

    Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 19.32 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LAVJQP9C7

  3. During these past rainy days around the metro (and most) of the islands I had the oportunity to notice something quite interesting (if not dumb). The Emergency Weather Warning interrrupts the cable signal, and I would expect this as normal for a regular cable tv subscriber line..but with powerlink also?... My question is: Is it normal for cable internet service lines to broadcast the emergency warning and interrupt the service? is it just another flop on onelink's side?

  4. now this is .. wrong..(er) ... latency is around the 80ms (not great, not bad, should be better).. but speeds SEEM to be capped at 2Mbit...can anybody run some tests to confirm? or should we blame it on the routing?.... actually, im quite possitive after checking my pings/traceroutes lets hope its a 1 day thing.. although its been like this for more than 2 days............

  5. Nope, alot of latency even to the first 4 hops (:( :( :( ) speeds are bellow the 1mbit barrier tonight.. Yet on a letter sent out (January 16th) under the new company name (OnelinkPr) they announce up to 4Mbps.. (4!) with no asterisks...ofcourse, this MUST have been a typo since it is only prudent to guarantee atleast 50% of your adversited speed... is it not? tune in for tomorow's tracerts .. in as Onelink tumbles...

  6. Yes, I Agree. Yet, one of the most dissapointing facts about this whole ordeal is the fact that they are not giving fair warning to their users. Heh, I don't know what its called but its not google in english anymore, its the .pr ( a /ncr resets it) , so things are changing. Anyways, whats the webmail for? those collocations in new york are getting dusty. They SHOULD start sending service interruption/"experimentation" advisories... its only appropriate for such ridiculously high fees.

  7. Not good at all....

    Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85]

    over a maximum of 30 hops:

      1    17 ms    13 ms    13 ms  host-70-45-36-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.36.1]

      2    12 ms    6 ms    8 ms  host-70-45-94-33.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.33]

      3    10 ms    10 ms    9 ms  host-70-45-94-101.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.101]

      4  154 ms  150 ms  151 ms  host-70-45-94-73.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.73]

      5  367 ms  152 ms  160 ms  unk-426d0ef9.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.249]

      6  595 ms  198 ms  207 ms  a1-00-00-00.c0.mia95.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.25]

      7  238 ms  244 ms  230 ms  p3-00-01-00.c0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.5]

      8  493 ms  189 ms  191 ms  g1-02-03-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.4]

      9  258 ms  233 ms  236 ms  eq-dallas-1000M.theplanet.com [206.223.118.3]

    10    65 ms    59 ms    61 ms  vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29]

    11    80 ms    63 ms    61 ms  vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]

    12    79 ms    63 ms    63 ms  gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.9]

    13  233 ms  235 ms  237 ms  85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.8]

    Trace complete.

    But why go so far?

    Tracing route to www.caribe.net [209.91.196.18]

    over a maximum of 30 hops:

      1    11 ms    12 ms    15 ms  host-70-45-36-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.36.1]

      2    11 ms    7 ms    9 ms  host-70-45-94-33.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.33]

      3  174 ms  206 ms  185 ms  host-70-45-94-69.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.69]

      4  148 ms  179 ms  144 ms  host-70-45-94-65.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.65]

      5  193 ms  187 ms  191 ms  unk-426d0ef9.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.249]

      6  215 ms  208 ms  204 ms  a1-00-00-00.c0.mia95.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.225]

      7    *      241 ms  235 ms  p3-00-01-00.c0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.25]

      8  345 ms  243 ms  215 ms  g1-02-03-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.74]

      9  186 ms  187 ms  198 ms  g4-4.core01.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.10.233]

    10  238 ms  233 ms  233 ms  p13-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.2.21]

    11  491 ms  229 ms  247 ms  p13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.98]

    12  219 ms  214 ms  211 ms  p15-0.core01.tpa01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.46]

    13  220 ms  223 ms  218 ms  p5-0.core01.mia01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.57]

    14    94 ms    91 ms    92 ms  g0-1.na01.b006657-0.mia01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.250.9.202]

    15  251 ms  229 ms  216 ms  critical_hub_networks.demarc.cogentco.com [66.250.5.54]

    16  276 ms  271 ms  278 ms  sanjuan-core-2.bb.caribe.net [209.91.197.26]

    17  442 ms  257 ms  247 ms  sanjuan-core-1.bb.caribe.net [209.91.197.29]

    18  261 ms  246 ms  246 ms  cobalt5.caribe.net [209.91.196.18]

    Trace complete.

  8. its silly to go from san juan to fl to pa*? and some other states to come back to any island site? hah. there is(or was) a project called "Puerto Rico Internet Exchange" specifically aimed to tackled this ridiculous routing problem.. i dont know what happened to it.. it is(was) based out of the Gauss Lab at University of Puerto Rico http://www.ix.pr . And finally.. why don't onelinkpr customers have a page like this? http://www.centennialpr.com/bs/servicelevev.asp or this http://www.innovabycentennial.com/index.jsp  and might i add, centennial's network looks in good shape... then again.. i think they have a considerable hold over puerto rico's internet backbone(s) ... onlink should lease ;)

  9. well, im breaking records for this time during the evening.. over 100kB/s .. go onelinkpr!

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1059 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 129 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 24 2006 20:30:05 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB download in 7.94 sec

    Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 47.11 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T27ZBA4UW

    Vroom Vroom! *waits for the modem carrier to drop at any time* heheh

    Pings to www.google.com (64.233.179.104) averaging around 180ms, loss on some *.adelphiacom.net ... surprise!

×
×
  • Create New...