scumbucketsex
-
Posts
108 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by scumbucketsex
-
-
anyone else got any ideas to day? really wanna try and work out if there something we missed or if it is just bad phone line, any help greatly received.
-
yeh go to sleep mate. thanks for all your help today/tonight, if u think of anything else add it to this thread im gunna go now too, thanks again mate. anyone think of anything else to try leave in this thread and il check it tomorrow, thanks again.
-
when ever i try ping www.tesco.net it doesnt work, am i pinging the wrong address?
-
any idea what it means?we've changed alot of things, are my settings better than they have been by these results?
-
WEB100 Kernel Variables:
Client: localhost/127.0.0.1
AckPktsIn: 215
AckPktsOut: 0
BytesRetrans: 0
CongAvoid: 187
CongestionOverCount: 0
CongestionSignals: 0
CountRTT: 198
CurCwnd: 27740
CurMSS: 1460
CurRTO: 690
CurRwinRcvd: 128480
CurRwinSent: 16304
CurSsthresh: 2920
DSACKDups: 0
DataBytesIn: 0
DataBytesOut: 567940
DataPktsIn: 0
DataPktsOut: 389
DupAcksIn: 17
ECNEnabled: 0
FastRetran: 0
MaxCwnd: 27740
MaxMSS: 1460
MaxRTO: 710
MaxRTT: 490
MaxRwinRcvd: 128480
MaxRwinSent: 16304
MaxSsthresh: 2920
MinMSS: 1460
MinRTO: 430
MinRTT: 180
MinRwinRcvd: 64240
MinRwinSent: 16304
NagleEnabled: 1
OtherReductions: 0
PktsIn: 215
PktsOut: 389
PktsRetrans: 0
X_Rcvbuf: 103424
RcvWinScale: 7
SACKEnabled: 3
SACKsRcvd: 27
SendStall: 0
SlowStart: 1
SampleRTT: 470
SmoothedRTT: 460
X_Sndbuf: 103424
SndWinScale: 1
SndLimTimeRwin: 0
SndLimTimeCwnd: 10138500
SndLimTimeSender: 2595
SndLimTransRwin: 0
SndLimTransCwnd: 1
SndLimTransSender: 1
SndLimBytesRwin: 0
SndLimBytesCwnd: 567940
SndLimBytesSender: 0
SubsequentTimeouts: 0
SumRTT: 64570
Timeouts: 0
TimestampsEnabled: 0
WinScaleRcvd: 1
WinScaleSent: 7
DupAcksOut: 0
StartTimeUsec: 586948
Duration: 10143852
c2sData: 2
c2sAck: 2
s2cData: 2
s2cAck: 2
half_duplex: 0
link: 100
congestion: 1
bad_cable: 0
mismatch: 0
spd: 0.00
bw: 34.16
loss: 0.000001000
avgrtt: 326.11
waitsec: 0.00
timesec: 10.00
order: 0.0791
rwintime: 0.0000
sendtime: 0.0003
cwndtime: 0.9997
rwin: 0.9802
swin: 64.0000
cwin: 0.2116
rttsec: 0.326111
Sndbuf: 8388608
aspd: 2.06005
Checking for mismatch on uplink
(speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5]
(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01]
Checking for excessive errors condition
(loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],
(loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [2920>0]
Checking for 10 Mbps link
(speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]
(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for Wireless link
(sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]
(Estimate > 50 [34.16>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]
(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link
(speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]
(SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for half-duplex condition
(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],
(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]
Checking for congestion
(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]
(MaxSsthresh > 0) [2920>0]
estimate = 34.16 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 326.11msec, and loss = 1.0E-6
The theoretical network limit is 34.16 Mbps
The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 196.25 Mbps
Your PC/Workstation has a 125.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 3.00 Mbps
The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.64 Mbps
Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'
Server Data reports link is 'T1', Server Acks report link is 'T1'
-
WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.38Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 439.06kb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_04
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 326.11 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and
No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 7.91% of the time
This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time.
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
Packet size is preserved End-to-End
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
-
click START to re-test
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.38Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 439.06kb/s
Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem
Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link
click START to re-test
-
this is what i am getting now, can you tell me if any better:
TCP options string = 020405b40103030101010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 128480
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2)
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
Your TCP Window limits you to: 5139.2 kbps (642.4 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 2055.68 kbps (256.96 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 58 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
-
i'll have a fiddle, but all downloads and my settings are all correct now tho yeh? so either something interfearing wih the net or bad phone lines yeh?
-
could it just be a bad phone line?or because the tracert is normal does that rule out the bad phone line? ive just checked my firewall and internet activites, nothing out of the ordinary on there, nothing coming in or out, very confusing!!
-
thanks, i am living in a brand new house, so mayb new phone line a problem? i just checked my broadband diagnostics and got this:
speed [up/down]: 288/1.152kbps
cant work out how come my downloads dont equal this, where is it all going?....
-
ok, anything else i can do to improve my broadband download speeds now or we out of ideas?
-
in the top right corner of the page it says:
ASN: (numbers) [NTL (NTL Group Limited)], then followed by my address
-
Hop T1 T2 T3 Best Graph IP Hostname Dist TTL Ctry Time
1 0 0 0 0.4 ms
66.36.240.2 AS14361
HOPONE-DCA c-vl102-d1.acc.dca2.hopone.net. 255 US Unknown: 82e7f27e
2 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms]
66.36.224.232 AS0
IANA-RSVD-0 gec2.core1.dca2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unknown: 84d78ae3
3 5 5 5 5.7 ms [+5ms]
66.36.224.174 AS0
IANA-RSVD-0 cw.peer.nyc2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 252 US Unix: 22:11:12.499
4 6 5 19 5.9 ms [+0ms]
195.2.3.13 AS1273
CW so-3-0-0-dcr1.nyk.cw.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 EU Unix: 22:11:12.527
5 103 81 81 81 ms [+75ms]
195.2.10.110 AS1273
CW so-2-0-0-dcr2.tsd.cw.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 EU Unix: 22:11:12.702
6 84 82 92 82 ms [+0ms]
195.2.10.61 AS1273
CW so-5-0-0-bcr1.tsd.cw.net. 0 miles [+0] 249 EU Unix: 22:11:12.783
7 83 83 83 82 ms [+0ms]
166.63.211.150 AS1273
CW ntl1.tsd.cw.net. 0 miles [+0] 248 US Unix: 22:03:39.575
8 87 82 82 82 ms [+0ms]
62.253.185.97 AS5089
NTL nth-bb-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com. 0 miles [+0] 248 UK Unix: 22:10:20.153
9 218 84 98 84 ms [+2ms]
62.253.188.226 AS5089
NTL pete-t2core-a-pos31.inet.ntl.com. 0 miles [+0] 245 UK Unix: 22:11:13.225
10 346 144 134 134 ms [+49ms]
80.3.129.14 AS5089
NTL pete-bam-1-ge100.inet.ntl.com. 0 miles [+0] 246 UK Unix: 22:11:13. 38
11 * * * 99999 ms [+99999ms]
[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond] 0 miles [+0]
12 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]
[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond] 0 miles [+0]
13 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]
[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond] 0 miles [+0]
14 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]
[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond]
[4 hops with no response:
assuming we hit a firewall
that blocks pings] 0 miles [+0]
15
Analysis:
Number of hops: 14
Last hop responding to ICMP: 10, UDP: 10, TCP: 10.
There appears to be a firewall right after (hop 10) that blocks ICMP, unwanted UDP, and unwanted TCP packets.
Legend:
T1/T2/T3 are the round-trip times in milliseconds (1/1000ths of a second).
T1 uses a proper ICMP-based tracert (Microsoft style). T2 uses a UDP-based traceroute (Unix-style). T3 uses a TCP-based traceroute (port 80).
Since many ISPs now block ICMP and/or packets to unknown ports, T3 (not used by many traceroute programs) typically shows the best results.
Best times may be theoretical (if it takes 80ms to hop 10, and 50ms to hop 11, we say the best time for hop 10 is 50ms).
If no reverse DNS entry is given for an IP, we display 'unknown.example.com' if the domain name is known.
-
this is what i got when i did the trace route before
Analysis:
Number of hops: 14
Last hop responding to ICMP: 13, UDP: 14, TCP: 13.
There appears to be a firewall at (hop 14) that blocks ICMP (ping) packets.
The destination appears to block unwanted TCP packets.
Legend:
T1/T2/T3 are the round-trip times in milliseconds (1/1000ths of a second).
T1 uses a proper ICMP-based tracert (Microsoft style). T2 uses a UDP-based traceroute (Unix-style). T3 uses a TCP-based traceroute (port 80).
Since many ISPs now block ICMP and/or packets to unknown ports, T3 (not used by many traceroute programs) typically shows the best results.
Best times may be theoretical (if it takes 80ms to hop 10, and 50ms to hop 11, we say the best time for hop 10 is 50ms).
If no reverse DNS entry is given for an IP, we display 'unknown.example.com' if the domain name is known.
shall i do it again?
-
dont know what you mean sorry mate for being such a noob with this stuff
-
done, i have just noticed something in my tests it says this:
running at only 38.15 % of your hosts average (ntli.net)
but my broadband is with tescobroadband not ntli.net, does that make any difference to anything?
-
through a seperate modem connected via usb yes, do you mean change my password i use to sign on the net with?
-
what login password mate?
-
ok, im in cambridegshire in england, if that makes any difference
-
55% done and got 63.8kb average, my maximum went up from 82.9kb to 93.1 at about 40%, so should i stop the download now?
-
am getting an average of incoming 62.1kb at the mo, 29% done so far
-
big download mate what is it?u mean note speed y downloading or after?
-
WEB100 Kernel Variables:
Client: localhost/127.0.0.1
AckPktsIn: 250
AckPktsOut: 0
BytesRetrans: 32120
CongAvoid: 90
CongestionOverCount: 0
CongestionSignals: 1
CountRTT: 176
CurCwnd: 48180
CurMSS: 1460
CurRTO: 1140
CurRwinRcvd: 128480
CurRwinSent: 16304
CurSsthresh: 43800
DSACKDups: 0
DataBytesIn: 0
DataBytesOut: 665760
DataPktsIn: 0
DataPktsOut: 456
DupAcksIn: 55
ECNEnabled: 0
FastRetran: 1
MaxCwnd: 87600
MaxMSS: 1460
MaxRTO: 1350
MaxRTT: 940
MaxRwinRcvd: 128480
MaxRwinSent: 16304
MaxSsthresh: 43800
MinMSS: 1460
MinRTO: 560
MinRTT: 190
MinRwinRcvd: 64240
MinRwinSent: 16304
NagleEnabled: 1
OtherReductions: 0
PktsIn: 250
PktsOut: 456
PktsRetrans: 22
X_Rcvbuf: 103424
RcvWinScale: 7
SACKEnabled: 3
SACKsRcvd: 83
SendStall: 0
SlowStart: 76
SampleRTT: 780
SmoothedRTT: 790
X_Sndbuf: 103424
SndWinScale: 1
SndLimTimeRwin: 0
SndLimTimeCwnd: 10106849
SndLimTimeSender: 2585
SndLimTransRwin: 0
SndLimTransCwnd: 1
SndLimTransSender: 1
SndLimBytesRwin: 0
SndLimBytesCwnd: 665760
SndLimBytesSender: 0
SubsequentTimeouts: 0
SumRTT: 109670
Timeouts: 0
TimestampsEnabled: 0
WinScaleRcvd: 1
WinScaleSent: 7
DupAcksOut: 0
StartTimeUsec: 137629
Duration: 10112201
c2sData: 2
c2sAck: 2
s2cData: 9
s2cAck: 2
half_duplex: 0
link: 100
congestion: 1
bad_cable: 0
mismatch: 0
spd: 0.00
bw: 0.38
loss: 0.002192982
avgrtt: 623.12
waitsec: 0.00
timesec: 10.00
order: 0.2200
rwintime: 0.0000
sendtime: 0.0003
cwndtime: 0.9997
rwin: 0.9802
swin: 64.0000
cwin: 0.6683
rttsec: 0.623125
Sndbuf: 8388608
aspd: 2.29277
Checking for mismatch on uplink
(speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5]
(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01]
Checking for excessive errors condition
(loss/sec > .15) [2.19>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],
(loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [43800>0]
Checking for 10 Mbps link
(speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]
(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for Wireless link
(sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]
(Estimate > 50 [0.38>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]
(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link
(speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]
(SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]
Checking for half-duplex condition
(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],
(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]
Checking for congestion
(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]
(MaxSsthresh > 0) [43800>0]
estimate = 0.38 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 623.12msec, and loss = 0.002192982
The theoretical network limit is 0.38 Mbps
The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 102.70 Mbps
Your PC/Workstation has a 125.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.57 Mbps
The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.07 Mbps
Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'
Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1'
hi im new here, sorry to bother you all but is this right?
in Make it Faster...
Posted
ive saved the tcp optimizer to my desktop butnot run it yet