ballista
-
Posts
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by ballista
-
-
Van those 3 timed out on me
-
This is from my 8Mb/768Kb speeds not bad considering my onboard ethernet is fouled up right now.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 8277 Kbps about 8.28 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1010 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 12:41am
Bottom Line:: 144X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.01 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.922 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 65.41 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-456ADJS9H
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 725 Kbps about 0.73 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 89 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 12:42am
Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 11.51 sec
Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 11.44512 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 94.37 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2CLFMH5XE
-
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 8277 Kbps about 8.28 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1010 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 12:41am
Bottom Line:: 144X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.01 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.922 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 65.41 % faster than the average for host
(comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-456ADJS9H
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 725 Kbps about 0.73 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 89 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 12:42am
Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 11.51 sec
Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 11.44512 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 94.37 % faster than the average for host
(comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2CLFMH5XE
-
wrong section
-
I believe I'll just leave it alone for now see how I like it if I need more I may tweak it some.
-
wOOt I just upgraded to gamer package and this is the results. Also make Comcast get out there and check your drop that is most likely the problem or they haven't changed your service like they said.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 8149 Kbps about 8.15 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 995 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/05 - 1:33am
Bottom Line:: 142X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.03 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 6.015 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 63.21 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LVFU7IBRT
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 700 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 85 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2006/05/05 - 3:34am
Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 12.05 sec
Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 11.8656 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 88.17 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5SGNHVOI4
-
I also have Comcast 6meg and I've had to have Comcast out several times to fix the drop and they even had to move it twice. And I have the Surfboard SB5120 since I got that no problems in speed whatsoever. Just a few connection Interrupts in COD2 which Comcast has yet to fix.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 6273 Kbps about 6.27 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 766 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/04 - 11:15pm
Bottom Line:: 109X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.34 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 7.813 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 25.64 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2MEP04ZYB
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 366 Kbps about 0.37 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/04 - 11:08pm
Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 22.76 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 12.97536 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 98.39 % of your hosts average (Comcast.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AMS8HOCRZ
-
-
Woohoo I bought mine off of zipzoomfly.com and I got v.3 so HAHA! lol j/k. But since this particular router is in the lime-light at this time I was just wondering if there are any routers you guys know of that get better range on wireless G. My wifes laptop isn't getting the best in the world and it's only like 100 ft. from the router itself, through 3 rooms and a short hallway.
-
So you buy a 2.8+GHz and it operates as a 2.8+GHz but is clocked as a 1.6MHz......So why is it not clocked at the speed u bought, and operate at the speed u bought?
Well mainly to keep voltage and heat output down. Any overclocker in here can tell you that the athlon cores run pretty toasty as is. Now it's nowhere near as hot as a prescott core P4 but they still put out some heat. My brother has a Athlon 3400+ with a XP-90 cooler and it runs well up into the 60 degree celsius range with no overclocking.
-
well let me throw this at u, i have a p4 2.8 and just built a second system useing AMD and its a amd 64 3200, i have to say even though its clocked at 2.1 i think, its faster than my p4 2.8
Right your AMD is a 3200+ which means it's doing the same amount of processing and as fast as a 3.2G intel. So therefore it would be faster than your 2.8G P4. Now if you had a Athlon 64 2800+ you probably wouldn't be able to tell much difference at all except in gaming. AMDs own intel processors in gaming apps.
-
The only way adding a theme to your OS and have it make your computer slower would be if ya had a slow computer or less than 1 gig of ram. Then you would really be able to tell a difference.
-
Basically if it is labeled as 2800+ it will do the same amount of work as a intel 2.8G processor. But it is actually lower clocked and doing the same work as fast as a 2.8G intel processor. Man this is kinda hard to explain so I'm just getting repetitive now. A 2800+ processor is a processor clocked at 1.8G doing the work of a 2.8G processor.
-
lol your right but butler has dsl i live close to MCY then butler we have cable tv but not internet lol and dsl stops at the new school they made
Wow when did butler get DSL? Man they must be stepping up in life. I have a few friends in butler do you know if the DSL would run to the north carolina cut-off towards little milligan school? Because one of my friends is moving just to get high speed. Maybe he won't have to.
-
Well once again you should call comcast and see what they got going or earthlink. Even though the earthlink DSL techs are retarded. So I am assuming you live in hampton or roan mountain, maybe butler. If that's the case I know charter, comcast, and earthlink service hampton and roan mountain. For Butler dude you're S.O.L. nothing goes to butler especially on purpose.
-
is this still bad?
Downstream Value
Frequency 723000000 Hz
Signal to Noise Ratio 37 dB
QAM QAM256
Network Access Control Object ON
Power Level 12 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading
Upstream Value
Channel ID 8
Frequency 24800000 Hz
Ranging Service ID 3973
Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/s
Power Level 58 dBmV
Your power levels are way high. I've been having similar problems. From the drop on the pole I was losing 23 dB in 120 feet. They actually came out today and moved the drop for me now it's about 25 feet from the house. And my speeds are alot better. My main problem was very extreme fluctuation in speeds I was going from 6 meg to 500 k/bs and back up and down the whole time it was running. Now oddly enough the tech told me it was from water getting into the drop and causing power fluctuations on the line. Here's what my SB5120 signals read which are actually normal now. I really hope this may help you out. Oh yeah I have the 6 meg package.
Downstream Value
Frequency 459000000 Hz
Signal to Noise Ratio 35 dB
QAM QAM256
Network Access Control Object ON
Power Level 5 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading
Upstream Value
Channel ID 3
Frequency 30992000 Hz
Ranging Service ID 1574
Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/s
Power Level 47 dBmV
-
My brother has charter in Kingsport, TN and he's getting the same crap going on. My personal opinion on it is just they have overloaded there capacity. Especially since they started the phone service alot of people have switched over and are just eating all the bandwidth. The reason I state this little theory is b/c my brothers problems conincide with charter starting their phone services.
-
Where in East tennessee b/c my bro lives in Kingsport and he has charter. Also a couple of friends from work have charter. You may want to call and ask Comcast if they can provide for you. I get blazing speeds with them.
Upgrading computer :: what do you think?
in Networking and Hardware
Posted
Hey I'll sell you a ASUS p5nd2-SLI for $85 dollars shipped. I've had it for about a week and I just realized I can't afford 2 video cards. So I'm gonna go back to my 955x chipset motherboard.