Jump to content

vagarcia74

Members
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

About vagarcia74

  • Rank
    Jr. Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. not sure about the upload speed, but the download I'm paying for is 6 MB
  2. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6200 Kbps about 6.2 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 757 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Wed May 11 2005 13:16:42 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 111X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.35 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 94.42 % faster than the average for host (wideopenwest.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BXRSU9Q0Y
  3. I did, they're coming this morning. In between the next 2 - 6 hours. I noticed that the activity light on the modem just freezes during DLs, which never happened before so i called them and yelled, and threatened to leave and tell everyone I know that has their service about this and how badly I'm being treated after being with them for 4 years now.
  4. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3a click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 339.19Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 84.33kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 339.19Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 84.33kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 92.0 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 28 packets retransmitted, 6 duplicate acks received, and 7 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 6 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 2.28 seconds (22.79%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.98% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 43 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 40880 CongAvoid: 18 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 12 CountRTT: 20 CurCwnd: 4380 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 380 CurRwinRcvd: 65535 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2920 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 140160 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 96 DupAcksIn: 6 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 5840 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 390 MaxRTT: 270 MaxRwinRcvd: 65535 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 2920 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 260 MinRTT: 50 MinRwinRcvd: 65535 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 43 PktsOut: 96 PktsRetrans: 28 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 7 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 17 SampleRTT: 70 SmoothedRTT: 100 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10419379 SndLimTimeSender: 2402 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 140160 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 5 SumRTT: 1840 Timeouts: 6 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 783735 Duration: 10430407 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.34 loss: 0.125000000 avgrtt: 92.00 waitsec: 2.28 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.1395 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0002 cwndtime: 0.9998 rwin: 0.5000 swin: 0.7891 cwin: 0.0446 rttsec: 0.092000 Sndbuf: 103424 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [2920>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [2.8>2], (estimate > 2) [0.34>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.33<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.12<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.01>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.12<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [2920>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.33<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.12<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.34>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [2920>0] estimate = 0.34 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 92.0msec, and loss = 0.125 The theoretical network limit is 0.34 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 8.57 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 5.43 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.48 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:74f70?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal
  5. Here are the speed tests they aren't good. I took them from 3 different places just to make sure. DSL reports: 48 / 243 Toast.net : 37 /242 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 189 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Download Speed is:: 23 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Wed Feb 23 2005 17:21:15 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB download in 44.52 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 6.06 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-JHY6L0N5M :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 233 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 28 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Wed Feb 23 2005 17:23:08 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 36.57 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 71.25 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-0FNYQS7KL
  6. I bought some new cables and then did a new quality test today. here are my results. I already notice quite a difference on how fast it takes a new page to load. http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1663263
  7. Well i can physically see a difference with the cable that's showing a smaller amount of packet loss. The pages look like they're moving faster.
  8. but it would seem to me that would effect both DL and UL speeds, and yet for some reason Only my DL speed is being effectted, or am I just wrong and it could just effect one thing.
  9. nope they took that with them
  10. There was definately a noticiible difference. I tried tiwht the two different cables and got the following results. http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1662214 and then http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1662232 but could just a faulty lan cable be the result of such a slow connectiion?
  11. I just changed the lan cable that was given to me by comcast for the lan cable I had on the router. I disconnected the router and am just using the cable modem again. still seems crapy. going to try and run another test
  12. Here are the results of the test I took without the router http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1662150 Here is the test with my routers http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1662179
  13. When I talked to the Comcast tech today, he said that it was more than likely a trojan or other type of spyware in my computer,. Thing is i've got everything upto date and have run every scan i know of and i show nothing like that. He then suggested I reformat my computer, which i really don't want to do if I can avoid it.
  14. that was with my routerr. without the router, for some reason it's not pingable
×
×
  • Create New...