Jump to content

hulioni

Members
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by hulioni

  1. :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 15217 Kbps about 15.22 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1858 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1087 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 133 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2) Test Time:: 2007/01/11 - 2:53pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-G8IX9OHR4 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4K3OXNEF0 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 [!] On the 10/1 premier package. Hav
  2. Still running great here in central kansas. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10184 Kbps about 10.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1243 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/07 - 4:03am Bottom Line:: 182X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.82 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 135.69 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B7C8KOVPH :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1148 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 140 kB/s Tested From:: ht
  3. Still running great here in central kansas. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10184 Kbps about 10.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1243 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/07 - 4:03am Bottom Line:: 182X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.82 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 135.69 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B7C8KOVPH :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1148 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 140 kB/s Tested From:
  4. A little bit over 8000. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7749
  5. He's correct on this, its old news. I used to see them going for high dollar on ebay just because they weren't released here. Here is a link that takes an in depth look into the PSX (dated 2003). http://liksang.com/news.php?artc=3244
  6. Been using the Linksys WRT54GX since it came out and has been the best router I've had yet. It has the farthest coverage and the best throughput of any of them (54g, 54gs, ? dlink, I've had). I can use my laptop at my neighboors house with signal showing very good, and still get my max connection on testmy.net tests. I just received a new linksys WRT54GX4 with the srx 400 and haven't seen the performance that I get with the original srx model. I don't have the new srx 400 laptop adapter to test the claimed 240mbs wireless speeds yet, so it isn't a fair test I guess. But with the adaptors
  7. Not sure about that board, all I've ever used was Abit and DFI. One other thing about the AMD's is that for the most part I think they run a bit cooler than comparable Intel chips, which may or may not matter to you.
  8. I guess you can see what a x2 3800 does. I'll post mine at stock and at 2.6. You should be able to overclock the x2 and the opteron easily to 2.4 (the opteron should make 2.4 to 2.6 fairly easy). I post scores here in a minute.
  9. I have a P4 2.8c @ 3.6 and as for benchmarks and games it doesn't quite keep up. If you are just going to play games then AMD would be the pick hands down. If you do mostly video editing and the like I would say that the Intel has the advantage. If you want a comparison to an x2 3800 run some sisoft sanda benches and I'll underclock mine down to the 3800's speeds and bench the same ones and post if you'd like. My 175 @ 2.6 destroys my Intel in every bench and in games (Intel has a 6800ultra and AMD has SLI 7800gtx's so its not comparing apples to apples). For the money I would still say t
  10. I'm on the far west side of Hutchinson. I'm sure that this is just temporary thing (in the mid 10's) and once they are up and running a few days, weeks, I'll be back down to just over 9. I seem to have always been at least .5 over the cap.
  11. Instead of the x2 I am in favor of going with the Opteron 165 (twice the L2 cache). If you choose the 165 (if you can find one) you will need a motherboard that will get over 300 fsb, in order to reach your max oc potential since the multiplier is locked at 9 down. Which again brings us to DFI, as they are known for great over clocks (I have two and they have been great). Just got my Opty 175 dual core (11x multiplier) and absolutely love the performace over my old 3700+. Even if you can only get 2.2 to 2.4ghz out of it you wont be disappointed.
  12. You are right about that, and I'm thankful. Parents live in K.C. and roadrunner sucks up there. I would rather have a 5/2 as I would like more up, the download increase is just a bonus to me.
  13. I live in a small town and the people that live around me don't even know what the internet is. I know a tech guy here and this node has the fewest people on it around here, so I think I'll be OK. Your right though the more people on your node the slower it will get. Not trying to start a fight here, it's just that I seem to be in the best case scenario as far as speed goes. After all I'm just glad they did the upgrade since there is no comp. around here. But if the entire network gets more people on it then yes I will slow down with the rest of them (fingers crossed). It has been a goo
  14. Well it may not have been the actual 5/768 plan but for the three years I've never been below 5 but a few occasions. Thats what I really meant. And my upload was never lower than 512. Still the point is it has never slowed and I still don't expect it to.
  15. Been on the 5/768 package for three years and have always gotten over the cap. I am not too worried that its going to slow down.
  16. This is the new upgrade in Kansas. Love the new speeds. I'm on primere 9/1. Way to go Cox. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 11553 Kbps about 11.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1410 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 01 2005 13:27:07 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 206X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.73 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 211.99 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0DOIFJVY7 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is::
  17. Forgot to login in first before taking the test but this is what I'm getting now with the 10/10 tweak in cablenut. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 11553 Kbps about 11.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1410 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 01 2005 13:27:07 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 206X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.73 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 211.99 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0DOIFJVY7 :::.. Upload Stats ..
  18. Ran an FTP server for years now and have never hit a cap yet. Not sure what they advertise as their cap but they don't seem to enforce it very often, if ever. Which makes them great in my book, as long as they don't start forcing it now after the upgrade. Kudos to Cox, it's about time they stopped neglecting the midwest.
  19. Thank god. Just noticed tonight that I've been upgraded to the 9/1 package. I'm in central Kansas and never thought it would happen without competition. My downloads aren't the best yet but I'm getting a constant 1150kbps up though. Guess I need to load a new setting file in cablenut.
  20. I love this dang monitor. Seen a week or two ago that dell had the coupons to get it for under $800, thats a hell of a deal for a monitor like this. Wish I would have gotten it for that cheap. It is great but only if you have the horsepower to run it, so even at that price it's not cheap if you have to upgrade everything else. Most of the reviews I read before buying it are spot on.
  21. Yeah I'm thinking about an upgrade to dual core after Christmas if the prices fall again as they are supposed to, and I can get a couple bucks out of this one. Here is a backup computer in the other room. Intel 2.8c @ 3.6 EVGA 6800ultra The rest of the stuff is pretty standard. Good for buds to play on so they don't have to pack theirs up for some racing.
  22. The laptop is a Sony 2.4ghz Intel with a crappy radeon 7500. You can see how much bigger the Dell 24" is compared to the laptops 15". Main computer specs. AMD 64 3700+ @ 2.8 for everyday on water cooling (thinking of selling and getting a dual core) DFI SLI-DR motherboard 1 gig of OCZ VX for benching or 2x1gig patriot for everyday use 2x 74g raptors in raid 0 Nec 3540 DVD burner PC Power and Cooling 510 Sli power supply Case is a Koolance PC3-720BK 2x XFX 7800GTX (490/1300) in Sli Audigy 2zs gamer sound card Klipsch speakers Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24-inch Wide A
  23. Well the tests were done with the new 6.70 motherboard drivers that just came out. You are correct that those scores are low (lowest I've seen). I am hoping that it is just a bad install. The last time I tested it was around 3300 write and 7300 read. Gives me something to do I guess. As for the ram itself, its OCZ PC 3200 Gold Edition VX 1 gig Dual Channel Kit. Any ideas?
×
×
  • Create New...