Jump to content

Sparticus

News Anchor
  • Posts

    1,599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by Sparticus

  1. Hey CA3LE,


    Been quite a while since I've been on the forums! Anyways wanted to see if you had some input on my situation. So a few months ago I got a speed increase from 50/5 to 300/20. Before I got the speed increase I was always able to test above 50mbps on TMN. I have never been able to achieve 300mbps on any TMN official server. The only TMN server that I can get close to my advertised speed is dallas4.testmt.net if I use any other server even a Dallas one I only get about half of my advertised speeds. I am able to achieve above 300mbps on other HTML 5 based speed tests such as DSLReports, Speedtest.net BETA (HTML 5 version) and speedof.me

     

    On DSLReports I selected a Dallas server hosted by Softlayer and I just got this result 

     

    3799126.png

     

     

    I tested TMN right after on the dallas4.testmy.net server and got like 190mbps down. I am using a hardwired connection when I run the tests.

  2. This was tested using my iPhone hotspot on VZW 4G LTE w/ one bar of signal.

     

    :::.. Download Speed Test Result Details ..:::
    Download Connection Speed:: 10320 Kbps or 10.3 Mbps 
    Download Speed Test Size:: 6 MB or 6144 kB or 6291456 bytes
    Download Binary File Transfer Speed:: 1290 kB/s or 1.3 MB/s
    Tested At:: http://TestMy.net Version 13
    TiP Measurement Summary:: Min 4 Mbps | Middle Avg 12.63 Mbps | Max 14.93 Mbps | 43% Variance
    TiP Data Points:: 4 Mbps, 6.99 Mbps, 8.09 Mbps, 11.92 Mbps, 12.93 Mbps, 12.75 Mbps, 12.32 Mbps, 13.52 Mbps, 14.93 Mbps, 14.79 Mbps, 14.26 Mbps, 13.72 Mbps, 13 Mbps, 12.82 Mbps, 13.72 Mbps, 13.88 Mbps, 12.68 Mbps, 12.38 Mbps, 7.29 Mbps
    Test Time:: 2013-11-03 22:47:28 Local Time 
    Location:: Charlotte, NC US >> Destination:: Dallas, TX US
    1MB Download in 0.79 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~13 Minutes - 184X faster than 56K
    This test of exactly 6144 kB took 4.892 seconds to complete
    Running at 145% of hosts average (Verizon Wireless https://testmy.net/hoststats/verizon_wireless
    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9) AppleWebKit/537.71 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Safari/537.71 [!]
  3. I'm using an AirPort Extreme 802.11n (5th Generation). It's a great one too. I'm not actually using it as the router, but as a wireless switch that feeds my old D-Link DI-604 which performs the actual routing function. I did it that way so that I could put the router in the basement with all the Ethernet lines running to it through a gigabit switch. The house has wired ethernet in most rooms. That way I could put the AirPort Extreme upstairs in a central location. It has good range too, thru walls into the garage and out onto the deck.The AirPort Extreme, D-Link DI-604 router, and the D-Link DGS-1008G gigabit switch are rock solid reliable. Literally, the only time they ever get reset is when the electric power goes off. Wish I could say the same about the Time Warner equipment.The jury is still out on the Arris gateway from Time Warner. It's new here and came with a recent upgrade to faster Internet and phone service with their Signature Home plan. The Cisco DVR they have me is erratic and I think it will need to be replaced.

    All the equipment I have ever gotten from Time Warner has been junk, even the cable boxes. I've always just purchased my own modem. Especially now that they are trying to charge you $6 / month if you rent it from them.

  4. I just got one of those too. Best router I've worked with. I had the Linksys AC 1750 for about a week before (got it temporarily while I waited for my Nighthawk)... the Nighthawk is twice the router than Linksys' best offering right now. The range is amazing, I was having horrible signal on my patio with every other router I tried... Nighthawk (R7000) has been flawless. Good choice! Best router out right now in my opinion...

    http://www.netgear.com/home/products/wirelessrouters/ultimate-performance/R7000.aspx#

    I have to agree with you CA3LE I didn't want to shell out the $200 but I have to say it was well worth it.

  5. If you don't travel much I would go with the iMac. Its large screen is great for movies and doing work, etc.. 

     

    On the other hand you can't beat the Retina Display, not to mention the flash storage. Also you'd be able to tote this with you when you travel and such.

     

    If it was me... i'd go with the MacBook Pro w/ Retina ;)

  6. I don't know if it's just me or what, but I have noticed that Cox in my area (Roanoke, Virginia) has dramatically improved their performance. About a month ago I noticed that all my speeds were actually stable. When I have run download speed tests they have been very consistent. It's been quite a while since I have seen my speed drop below 11.5 mbps. Has anyone else noticed any improvements?

  7. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 16711 Kbps about 16.7 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2040 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2007/06/09 - 8:52pm

    Bottom Line:: 291X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.5 sec

    Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 23.843 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 186.2 % faster than the average for host (cox.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4VGBDKWZP

    User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

  8. Thats really good. I wouldn't bitch either. So how you been haven't seen you around for a while?

    Quite well, I moved so I am still unpacking and stuff. It's good to be back!

    here is a 43 MB test, downloads are HOT tonight.

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 16711 Kbps about 16.7 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2040 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2007/06/09 - 8:52pm

    Bottom Line:: 291X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.5 sec

    Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 23.843 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 186.2 % faster than the average for host (cox.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4VGBDKWZP

    User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

×
×
  • Create New...