Jump to content

markgot

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

About markgot

  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

markgot's Achievements

New Member

New Member (2/10)

0

Reputation

  1. At last, my connection's better!!! It seems the problem was in our modem...it was just too old I guess.... After the replacement, I just did what you guys posted, since it was still slow, and now here's the new result Thank you for your help Van. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1672 Kbps about 1.67 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 204 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 12:02am Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.02 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.657 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 171.87 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WUSO8YB9D User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 -Mark G.
  2. Hey Jose Rizal What does that program do? VanBuren, I just finished doing all those listed...finally...but still no change...I also did the TCP optimizer config, still going to do another speed test though...just to see any difference... -Mark G.
  3. Ok, apparently, my ISP is running at 1mbps, and my friend doesn't really believe in those accelerators cuz he thinks that they're just RAM eaters. And the results... TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65340 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65340 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2613.6 kbps (326.7 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1045.44 kbps (130.68 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 121 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) As for the D/L Speed...it became faster...a bit Your connection is: 158 Kbps or 0.16 Mbps You Downloaded at: 19 kB/s You are running: 3 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 53.89 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277445143524 Test Time:: 2006/07/26 - 7:21am Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Test ID: 4X9A81BVS (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 27.38 % of your hosts average (pldt.net) This was tested from a 386 kB file and took 20.015 seconds to complete Thanks again for helping -Mark G.
  4. I did what you said, and this was the result, and, btw, thanks for the welcoming. Sorry if I'm still noob to these things... Oh, and the asterix disappeared Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 272ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 273ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 53 ms 52 ms 49 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1] 3 51 ms 49 ms 50 ms 210.1.65.49 4 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.143 5 52 ms 52 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.76 6 226 ms 225 ms 228 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149] 7 223 ms 224 ms 225 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126] 8 275 ms 276 ms 277 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26] 9 273 ms 275 ms 272 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89] 10 274 ms 271 ms 272 ms theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226] 11 276 ms 274 ms 276 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 12 274 ms 272 ms 276 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 271 ms 275 ms 273 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 14 274 ms 271 ms 275 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. - Mark G.
  5. My computer's running on Windows XP SP2 and my ISP is PLDT DSL (Philippines) with an average of more or less 512kbps. Apparently, I'm only running at Your connection is: 81 Kbps or 0.08 Mbps You Downloaded at: 10 kB/s You are running: 1 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 102.4 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277445514559 Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Test ID: IMK00AF5B (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 14.36 % of your hosts average (pldt.net) This was tested from a 97 kB file and took 9.734 seconds to complete But my friend's result, with the same ISP and plan is Your connection is: 4375 Kbps or 4.38 Mbps You Downloaded at: 534 kB/s You are running: 76 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.92 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277451377581 Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.52 Test ID: 38HVG4YW7 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 675.71 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net) This was tested from a 5983 kB file and took 11.203 seconds to complete which just makes me so frustrated with my download speed I tried using TCP Optimizer, but I'm not sure how to use it.... And the analyzers' results are: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 15972 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 15972 RWIN seems to be set to a very small number. If you're on a broadband connection, consider using a larger value. RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 638.88 kbps (79.86 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 255.552 kbps (31.944 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 57 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Request timed out. Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 11, Lost = 1 (8% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 267ms, Maximum = 276ms, Average = 269ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * 46 ms 44 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1] 3 * 41 ms 41 ms 210.1.65.49 4 43 ms 42 ms * 58.71.0.79 5 40 ms 40 ms 46 ms 58.71.0.140 6 * * 218 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149] 7 217 ms 218 ms 234 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126] 8 266 ms 267 ms 268 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26] 9 267 ms 266 ms 267 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89] 10 * 268 ms * theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226] 11 268 ms 267 ms 266 ms vl32.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 12 267 ms * 267 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 268 ms 268 ms 267 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 14 * 268 ms 267 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So, please, if you have any suggestions on making my DSL optimized feel free to say them to me.... Thanks In Advance
×
×
  • Create New...