mdv_forever

Do you have any further suggestions? MDV_Forever

Well, it does not look good to me. I'm still hovering in the 76-78% of my cap! Would the "DSL PPPoE 3000 768.zip CCS file help in my case? I saw a post where the file looked liked it help that person who had the same cap as mine. I would like to give it a try. MDV_Forver

Well I made myself pingable but

OK, i made the changes that you requested and here are the results.. I can't seem to get past 85% of my isp's cap! http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:279ef53?service=dsl&speed=1.5&os=win98SE&via=normal :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1282 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 157 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Feb 25 2005 08:00:54 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.52 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 76.72 % of your hosts average (swbell.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-RPDN9OEJ0 TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 37752 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 37752 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1510.08 kbps (188.76 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 604.032 kbps (75.504 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100 Precedence (priority) = 100 (flash override) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 1 (low cost) My isp speed test located @ http://support.sbcglobal.net/cgi-bin/speedtest/ (i ran a test from Dallas location.) has a result of 1.273mbps / 306.04kps

I have already tried this file when i downloaded, "VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_5_ALL_WIN_OS_AND_SAT" /win98_me/mss1452/98 & ME DSL PPPoE 1500+.ccs 11/05/02 1:38am it did not make any faster before or this time.... http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:3b79fd2?service=dsl&speed=1.5&os=win98SE&via=normal :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1286 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 157 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Feb 24 2005 18:21:05 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.52 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 76.82 % of your hosts average (swbell.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-3Y29OHWBJ TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 63888 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 63888 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2555.52 kbps (319.44 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1022.208 kbps (127.776 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100 Precedence (priority) = 100 (flash override) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 1 (low cost) Would the "DSL PPPoE 3000 768.zip CCS file help in my case?

I'm not sure what you mean by tweak teast again...So here are the tests that i re-ran after setting req to defualt. http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:2e8e5a7?service=dsl&speed=1.5&os=win98SE&via=normal :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1219 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 149 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Feb 24 2005 15:52:08 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.87 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 72.65 % of your hosts average (swbell.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-H5KAP91XI TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 8712 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 8712 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 348.48 kbps (43.56 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 139.392 kbps (17.424 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 118 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 If this is not what you have requested please forgive and explaine again and i will try to comply

Hello and thanks for the responce, Here is the link to my last test, http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:2666353?service=dsl&speed=1.5&os=win98SE&via=normal I reinstall the speedguide tweak for win98sepppoe Also my connection went down and i was able to speak to a line tech and he told me that because of the limitation of the 1.5mb that I subscribe to that i would not get any speeds faster than 1.1 or 1.2mb. To get any faster I would have to subscribe to the 3mb level and then i would only get about 2.5mb because of the tcp, atm overhead However, if you know how to get me to 1.3-1.5 i would be very happy indeed!

Not reaching 90% of advertised speed of 1.5mb MAx only reaching 80% 1.2mb I was using RoadRunner cable modem and was getting speeds of more than 2.5mb I just switched over to SBC-Yahoo DSL to save some cash each month. I'm hoping I can get to at least 1.5 or more so your help is appreciated!! Information your forum requested: OS: Win 98 SBC Yahoo DSL: 1.5mb Current patch installed: sguide_tweak_98.inf dslreports.com/tweaks URL: http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:4cc69cc?service=dsl&speed=1.5&os=win98&via=normal www.testmy.net Download speed test results: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1283 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 157 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Wed Feb 23 2005 15:30:32 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.52 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 76.55 % of your hosts average (swbell.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-3XBS9CJVK :::.. END Download Stats ..::: Tracert of testmy.net results: Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6]over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 15 ms 14 ms 14 ms bras1-l0.austtx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.182.136] 2 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms bras1-l0.austtx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.182.136] 3 12 ms 14 ms 13 ms dist2-vlan60.austtx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.20.163] 4 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms bb2-g8-3-0.austtx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.20.242] 5 18 ms 18 ms 19 ms bb1-p10-3.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.191.237] 6 18 ms 20 ms 18 ms bb2-p6-0.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.191.122] 7 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms ex1-p2-0.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.40.33] 8 19 ms 18 ms 20 ms ex2-p2-0.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.242.42] 9 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms 151.164.249.82 10 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms 216.140.5.45 11 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms 67.99.43.234 12 20 ms 21 ms 20 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 13 21 ms 21 ms 20 ms dist-vlan22.dsr1-2.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85.127.76] 14 41 ms 21 ms 21 ms dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.39] 15 21 ms 21 ms 61 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 16 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms testmy.net [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. Under LAN connection - properties - general tab: Client for Microsoft Networks VIA PCI 10/100mb Fast Ethernet Adapter > Have latest Drivers < NetBeui TCP/IP File and Printer sharing for Mircosoft Networks Internet Explorer tools - internet options - connections - LAN settings, Nothing there is checked! Using LinkSys BEFSR41 EtherFast Cable / DSL Router > Have Lastest Firmware < Nic set at 100mb Tx Full Duplex I use Spy-Bot Search&Destroy for spyware and TuneUp Utilities 2004 for system maintenance and AVG-Free for virus protection. I don't use software firewall protection. Only Hardware firewall protection using LinkSysy router. Shields Ups Port Authority Edition Internet Vulnerability Profiling grc.com Test Results: Your Internet port 139 does not appear to exist! One or more ports on this system are operating in FULL STEALTH MODE! Standard Internet behavior requires port connection attempts to be answered with a success or refusal response. Therefore, only an attempt to connect to a nonexistent computer results in no response of either kind. But YOUR computer has DELIBERATELY CHOSEN NOT TO RESPOND (that's very cool!) which represents advanced computer and port stealthing capabilities. A machine configured in this fashion is well hardened to Internet NetBIOS attack and intrusion. Unable to connect with NetBIOS to your computer. All attempts to get any information from your computer have FAILED. (This is very uncommon for a Windows networking-based PC.) Relative to vulnerabilities from Windows networking, this computer appears to be VERY SECURE since it is NOT exposing ANY of its internal NetBIOS networking protocol over the Internet. I have ALL of the latest Windows 98SE Updates! MDV_Forever