VanBuren

do you run Windows Vista? if so, i have the same problems i did a fast search on google and its a common issue with Vista and Fraps if you find a solution, please share it here VanBuren

:twisted:

Advertised 100Mbps down and 10 Mbps up around 45 USD/month :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 8040 Kbps about 8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 981 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2007/04/25 - 12:09pm Bottom Line:: 140X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 1.04 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 1.524 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 308.95 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FCB7MKN08 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.11) Gecko/20070312 Firefox/1.5.0.11 [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 30978 Kbps about 31 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3781 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2007/04/25 - 12:14pm Bottom Line:: 540X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.27 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.546 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 66.59 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OHPL4R6CV User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.11) Gecko/20070312 Firefox/1.5.0.11 [!] VanBuren

I think ppl including me choose to post the result that shows the fastest speed Its hard to tell what speedtest that shows most accurate speed, but if your speed is more then 10% of advertised, you should question how accurate the test is just a sidenote, some servers at speedtest dot net says i have a 30Mbps upload, thats around 3 times my cap... i could post some scores and claim real but i know better VanBuren

read this thread http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=29&threadid=1972653&frmKeyword=&STARTPAGE=92&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear got some tips when it comes to OC on that mobo VanBuren

I dont know, but bus speed seems good, its 4 times the FSB maybe somone here can give some details how memory, bus speeds, fsb, ratios work together VanBuren

had to break 11k lol 11096p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1755633 VanBuren

havent seen any tests with the q6600, i assume its locked CPU multiplier on that one its not much benefits with quadcore in 3d, atleast not yet. I bought this quadcore since i plan to have this PC for 5 years. I figured its easy to upgrade the videocards when its needed VanBuren

:2funny: :2funny: good find tommie VanBuren

ran the PCmark05 as well 8817p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=828888 edit: upped CPU to 3.2 Ghz 9611p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=829651 VanBuren

had to test 3dmark01se on this clock GPU 616/2030 CPU 2940 VanBuren

i agree, more links! also a good AGP score are your GPU at stock speed? one more gig should help a bit, but i dont think much almost 11k now here is the latest clock 616/2030 10967p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1751643 think ill give up, dont want to ruin something to pass 11k lol i think the 320MB model i have suffer in these test compared to the 640MB model, but o well games run smooth and thats all i ask for VanBuren

i didnt push much, i set the memory to 1000 and core at 620 at first, but then i saw artifacts so i lowered core to 605 maybe i should have lowered the memory and increased core, i dunno whats best. temps got up, gpu was around 80 C idle, dont want to know the temps on load lol VanBuren

OC the GPU even more, with some luck i pass 11k some day http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1750296 VanBuren

awesome, i think thats the fastest score ever against testmy.net With a larger testfile you would most likely go even faster VanBuren btw welcome to the forum

dont know what your fishing for, but 1,00 SEK gives me 0,14 USD VanBuren

i use vista only for DX10, for tweaking and maxing out a connection XP is better. But for most ppl, that knows nothing about tweaks, Vista selftuning RWIN do a great job VanBuren

looking good DJ those temps are fine, wish i could be around 30 C on CPU during full load, it more like 60 for me haha without digging, your 3dmark is around where it suppose to be. You most likely need to OC your videocard to pass 10k, i did that once just to break 10k, but changed back to default again, since i don't have the need for it right now. now you can run all games at full details and still have decent fps, enjoy ! VanBuren

http://extreme.outervision.com/psucalculator.jsp try that, then you see a estimated need for Watts, but as been said, you need to check the amps aswell VanBuren

read this thread http://www.hostingforum.ca/244475-e6600-d975xbx2.html it might be heat throttling VanBuren

its Intel speed step, disable it in BIOS VanBuren

looking good, average 194 fps in CS should be more then enough do you play other games? VanBuren

i would check this site, http://www.slizone.com/object/slizone_build_psu.html#certified_powersupplies VanBuren

Im happy to just passed 10k, after some OC of videocard and CPU My videocard single 320MB 8800 GTS is the weak link, with all default i get 9500p so lack of memory is the problem http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1644900 VanBuren

:haha: :haha: