lazy8

lol yeah it's like a pimp well bah.. how you delete post? I edited the first one..

ahh ok when the movie first comes on?

"Act a Fool" Written by Christopher Bridges, Keith McMasters Performed by Ludacris Courtesy of Disturbing tha Peace Entertainment, Inc./Def Jam South

IE :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 382 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Fri Jun 3 15:45:32 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 36.43 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZHAD5VQMF FF :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 379 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 46 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Fri Jun 03 2005 15:46:26 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.26 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 35.36 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SOAB964PN

IE :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4912 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 600 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Jun 3 15:38:09 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 88X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.71 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 27.95 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I6YGEKHLB FF :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4765 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 582 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Jun 03 2005 15:41:13 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 24.12 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-51BWRNP7G FF dosen

aight; to make sure I got this right. I have to set the SSID, Channel, and security of my D-link the same as the linksys an I'm good to go? This might not be too bad after all thanks

ok cool ty ^^ for the help

Ok I didn't want to start a new thread because I wasn't sure I understand this one right . but... here goes.... Is it possible to have two wireless routers connected to each other? I'll explain; The modem is in the upstairs of the house connected to a Linksys wireless router, not sure which model #. Is it possible to have my D-link DI-524 connect to it wirelessly which will be in the downstairs of the house in an apartment? So that I could use the 4 hardwired ports for the computers and PS2 that will be down there? And if I understood this thread right; it is possible I just have to get a wireless card for one of the PC's? Or would I even be able to use a laptop that has a wireless card and hardwire port? Help lol I'm so confused hehe Any help would be great ^^ Thank you

you are hitting your speeds caps with the rr 5/384 ...

oh my... where ya at TWC my RR seems to be falling behind

hey check this program out called DVDShrink it's what I use to back up all of my DVD'd to 4.7GB DVD disc http://www.dvdshrink.org/what.html

ahh thats better :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3580 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 437 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 64X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.34 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 98.81 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QTSL780GE can ya take it back down plz I like seeing the crazy insane speeds lol

What is the cable nut file that you are useing .s1? I've beed trying to get a good file that I really like and can't seem to find one

This is what I get if I use the 5.1 MB file which is the speeds that I would expect for going over seas, but... why the crazy 10MB speeds with the 20MB file?? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2177 Kbps about 2.2 Mbps (tested with 5248 kB) Download Speed is:: 266 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 39X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3.85 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 60.09 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-V9HGXUNQT

yep all thest test have been in the past couple of mins. I even cleared all cach cookies temp files, the whole works before I did this test :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8803 Kbps about 8.8 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1075 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 157X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.95 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 142.98 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-45TYESGNH

These are my usual speeds :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4740 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 579 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Fri Apr 22 13:24:08 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.77 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.87 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NT7ER3WC8 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4848 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 592 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Fri Apr 22 13:25:31 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 87X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.73 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 33.85 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I3D7XKCOZ :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4863 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 594 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Fri Apr 22 13:26:10 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 87X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.72 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 34.23 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B2XV1IH79 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. D:Documents and SettingsMe>ping testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 64ms D:Documents and SettingsMe>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 9 ms 6 ms 6 ms 10.59.192.1 3 6 ms 7 ms 10 ms gig2-1.clmascpaw-rtr1.sc.rr.com [24.31.192.97] 4 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms srp4-0.clmascmhe-rtr1.sc.rr.com [24.31.193.129] 5 22 ms 21 ms 22 ms son0-1-1.rlghncrdc-rtr3.nc.rr.com [24.93.64.117] 6 31 ms 30 ms 31 ms so-8-1.car1.Washington1.Level3.net [67.29.172.5] 7 30 ms 31 ms 30 ms ae-1-55.bbr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121.12 9] 8 62 ms 62 ms 62 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.109] 9 63 ms 63 ms 64 ms ge-1-2-54.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.102] 10 63 ms 63 ms 62 ms 4.78.220.10 11 66 ms 61 ms 62 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.29] 12 64 ms 63 ms 64 ms dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.83] 13 63 ms 64 ms 64 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18. 116.69] 14 64 ms 63 ms 64 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete. D:Documents and SettingsMe>

lol just ran another test :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8747 Kbps about 8.7 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1068 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 156X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 141.5 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WRPXQE3G7 D:Documents and SettingsMe>ping thegamer.serveftp.com Pinging thegamer.serveftp.com [213.115.113.141] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 213.115.113.141: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), D:Documents and SettingsMe>tracert thegamer.serveftp.com Tracing route to thegamer.serveftp.com [213.115.113.141] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 7 ms 5 ms 10.59.192.1 3 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms gig2-1.clmascpaw-rtr1.sc.rr.com [24.31.192.97] 4 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms srp4-0.clmascmhe-rtr2.sc.rr.com [24.31.193.130] 5 16 ms 14 ms 13 ms son0-1-3.chrlncsa-rtr6.carolina.rr.com [24.93.64 .125] 6 14 ms 15 ms 16 ms pop1-cha-P4-0.atdn.net [66.185.132.45] 7 14 ms 14 ms 19 ms bb1-cha-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.138.64] 8 19 ms 19 ms 20 ms bb1-atm-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.182] 9 20 ms 19 ms 20 ms pop2-atm-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.147.209] 10 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms Telia-atm.atdn.net [66.185.138.46] 11 34 ms 32 ms 31 ms ash-bb1-pos7-1-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.141] 12 37 ms 38 ms 37 ms nyk-bb1-pos7-1-0.telia.net [213.248.80.70] 13 117 ms 116 ms 118 ms kbn-bb1-pos1-3-0.telia.net [213.248.64.21] 14 133 ms 140 ms 133 ms s-bb1-pos7-0-0.telia.net [213.248.65.26] 15 131 ms 130 ms 130 ms s-b3-pos5-0.telia.net [213.248.66.2] 16 132 ms 132 ms 133 ms b2-100199-s-b3.c.telia.net [213.248.101.50] 17 137 ms 136 ms 137 ms pos2-0.cr2.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.117.21] 18 137 ms 136 ms 136 ms pos13-0.cr1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.105 ] 19 139 ms 138 ms 140 ms pos12-0.cr2.ore1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.42] 20 161 ms 160 ms 160 ms pos5-0.cr2.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.70] 21 156 ms 156 ms 157 ms vlan2.dr1.sto16.se.bredband.com [195.54.118.125] 22 158 ms 157 ms 158 ms vlan14.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.120.226] 23 158 ms 156 ms 156 ms vlan3.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.234] 24 * * * Request timed out. 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 * * * Request timed out. 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 * * * Request timed out. 30 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete. Yeah I'm sure I've got the 5000/385 RR cuz I'm not going to get the 8000/512 I think it is for like another $20/month.

I was running a bunch of speed test a usual and came across VanBurens test site https://testmy.net/o-VanBuren dropped my FW and used the medium 20MB file these are my results with a 5000/385 RR cable. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8954 Kbps about 9 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1093 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 160X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.94 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 147.28 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-C5FONTP9I :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8720 Kbps about 8.7 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1064 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 156X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 140.82 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-D0MO3ZWRG :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9072 Kbps about 9.1 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1107 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 162X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.93 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 150.54 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3WT8MIFPC These test are not cached on my end I always clear before I test. I also had my friend run the same test and this is what he got. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 25336 Kbps about 25.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3093 kB/s Tested From:: http://thegamer.serveftp.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 452X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.33 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 599.5 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Now don't get me wrong these speeds are amazing for 5000/385 and I wish they were always like that but come on. I know this isn't right at all.

Huh? I also missed some thing here The actual object isn't that big at 65,000ft we might not see it anyway. It has a "sight" that is about the size of TX. Basically it can cover that much area with a good service signal.

Hey and welcome Post up some speed test for us an read the sticky in the "Make it faster" forum

Whats does it mean that I failed these two last things? I passed all the rest but does this really mean anything that I failed these? http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1680513

no I think my friend has a motorola surfboard an I'm not even sure what modem I have it whatever TWC supplies

cool you are the shiz ty I was able to get one of my friends to over 5.2Mbps but it seems like I'm stuck with 4.6 or so. I guess it has to do with the location? maybe?

here I have the NIC set to 100full duplex instead of the auto setting TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3a click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 407.13Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.85Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 135.87 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 40 packets retransmitted, 169 duplicate acks received, and 203 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.87% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.88.24.200] but Client says [192.168.0.100] WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 2224 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 58400 CongAvoid: 1880 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 2020 CurCwnd: 77380 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 320 CurRwinRcvd: 687104 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 54020 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 6140760 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 4206 DupAcksIn: 169 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 164980 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 380 MaxRTT: 180 MaxRwinRcvd: 687104 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 81760 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 240 MinRTT: 40 MinRwinRcvd: 42944 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 2225 PktsOut: 4206 PktsRetrans: 40 X_Rcvbuf: 65535 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 203 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 139 SampleRTT: 120 SmoothedRTT: 120 X_Sndbuf: 65535 SndWinScale: 4 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10026931 SndLimTimeSender: 13462 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 6146600 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 274460 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 4 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 195174 Duration: 10047675 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 3 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 1 link: 0 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 3.76 loss: 0.000475511 avgrtt: 135.87 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0760 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0013 cwndtime: 0.9987 rwin: 5.2422 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 1.2587 rttsec: 0.135871 Sndbuf: 8388608 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [81760>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [4.0>2], (estimate > 2) [3.76>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.40<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [4.75<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [4.75>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [4.75<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [81760>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.40<9.5] (loss < .01) [4.75<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [3.76>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0013=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [81760>0] estimate = 3.76 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 135.87msec, and loss = 4.75511E-4 The theoretical network limit is 3.76 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 471.03 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 671.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 38.58 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 9.26 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is 'Ethernet', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' is there anything left for me to do?

I found this and was curious what this error od duplex mismatch is meaning? WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 406.53Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.80Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to HD and Switch set to FD Web100 reports the Round trip time = 156.57 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 44 packets retransmitted, 182 duplicate acks received, and 216 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.93% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.88.24.200] but Client says [192.168.0.100] this is with windows set to 100full duplex running threw my router and cablenut 5000/384 file applied