Jump to content

ohmerrymayhem

Members
  • Content Count

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by ohmerrymayhem

  1. Yeah, it's MUCH faster without the belkin.. Stupid router - I knew it was a piece of garbage. On that note, I'm going to be buying another router, and I'm interested which ones you've experienced that aren't crap? I don't wanna buy another POS like this one.
  2. I'm usin it - with the belkin router, you have to run the cable modem through the wireless router. I'm beginning to think it's a piece of crap.
  3. Comcast 6.0/s is what I'm payin for, hooked up through a Belkin wireless router on my laptop. This is what I get. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 100 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 12 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/07/08 - 10:25pm Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 85.33 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 245.641 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 1.74 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I1B3L9Z6A User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; IEMB3; IEMB3) [!] How pathetic? So pathetic. Tried TCP optimizer, no difference. I'm beginning to think it's my cheap stupid router. Have any of you ever had this kind of experience with a router before? The wireless card on my laptop works fine - had Verizon DSL, never had an issue, and I can connect to the networks at work, no problem. This, however, is ridiculous. Any help welcome.
  4. Yeah, it's faster without the router. So - I've just bought a piece of garbage router, then? Serves me right for gettin the cheaper one. I'll go get a D-Link this weekend.
  5. another note - i know it was suggested that i scan for spyware/viruses in safemode, did that, and removed the spyware with adaware. The computer's runnin better now, but the net is still slow.
  6. and... Your connection is: 2937 Kbps or 2.9 Mbps You downloaded at: 359 kB/s You are running: 51 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 2.85 second(s) Member Ident:Username:ohmerrymayhem CompID:221571505117 Test Time:: 2007/05/25 - 8:20pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; IEMB3; IEMB3) Test ID: DBWJ7T5Y0 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 51.74 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 8.344 seconds to complete on the wireless laptop
  7. Your connection is: 1768 Kbps or 1.8 Mbps You downloaded at: 216 kB/s You are running: 31 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 4.74 second(s) Member Ident:Username:ohmerrymayhem CompID:221571505117 Test Time:: 2007/05/25 - 8:20pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Test ID: YJ7RGNAM6 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 31.15 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.86 seconds to complete on the desktop (the hardlined one). I'll post the wireless in a second
  8. the speeds are VERY close to the same on both computers. Much frustration... I'll run the tests tonight and post em here for you, though.
  9. No, not using norton AV, i'm using AVG for virus. Yes, I use AIM & Yahoo messanger, though not most of the time - it's occasional. No, haven't scanned in safe mode, but I will and i'll get back to you guys.
  10. Tried all that except for CableNut, but have no clue how it works. Besides the other issues now, it seems I can't stay connected wirelessly from my laptop for more than a short time before it kicks me, saying that the network can't be found. Then I have to wait for it to be 'found' again, which takes anywhere from a few seconds to a couple hours, regardless of how many times I search for it. ALl the while, mind you, the hardlined computer is working fine. Now - my wireless card on the laptop is fine - I connect to numerous networks frequently, and none of them have any issues with speed OR connectivity. On another note, the keys and such to connect to the network are input correctly. Ideas, anyone?
  11. it says my DL speed is 159 kb/s ... haha.. i get about 20 kb/s on a download. So sad...
  12. Okay - disconnected the modem from the router and hardlined directly to the pc. this is the result :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1303 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 159 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/05/08 - 7:58pm Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.44 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 18.813 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 23.06 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0ODAEZQCN User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 [!]
  13. ok - wouldn't let me pull it up on the wireless - but on the hardlined pc i got this - Downstream: Frequency - 567000000 Hz Locked Signal to Noise Ratio - 40 db Power Level - 2dBmV Upstream: Channel ID - 1 Frequency - 230000000 Hz Ranged Power Level - 46dBmV
  14. okay - the modem is a motorola, the router (wireless) is a belkin, and these are the ping results - Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsJay>ping www.testmy.net -n 50 Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 67ms
  15. Not sure how to pull modem levels, but the wired pc gets... The same, except it's runnin at 19.76%. Still says "may need help" To the second replyer - it's the 60 buck package - the guy said 6mb i believe.
  16. Saw the other posts, so here are the results... Note the "Needs Help" part. Ha. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 783 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 96 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2007/05/08 - 6:45pm Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.67 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 31.282 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 13.86 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O3LSUFB8K User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; IEMB3; IEMB3) [!] I'm runnin XP Professional on my laptop, connected wireless through a router to one other pc (which is the hardlined one) through comcast service. Any ideas? 13.86% of my average is pretty lame..
×
×
  • Create New...