Many thanks for all of that CA3LE. I had a deadline coming up and was too keen to get started with the test, so even though there were embedded spaces in the names (which I wouldn't normally allow), I damned the torpedoes and went full speed ahead. I saw the option for identifiers and in hindsight should have used those with an account I had previosly set up. All just goes to show that haste makes waste, uncharacteristic of me, it always burns in the end.
Just to make sure I understand the reporting, if I wish to graph a given day's results I simply put that particular date into the Date field (and leave the Days field clear, implying 1 day). And if I wish to graph two or more sequential days forward from the Date field I simply put 2 (or more) in the Days field?
Yes, it looks like AT&T is faster, but what the data do not show as clearly (I really haven't sat down to analyze it yet) here is that Verizon has better coverage, and that is worth a lot. Some of the AT&T tests timed out after 5 minutes (if no results after 5 minutes, I call it a fail) and I think they therefore don't show in the list. I am also testing in the reverse direction on the voice side, but that requires manual recording.
I could not perform my analysis without this tool, in particular the logging capability, and so am highly appreciative. I also appreciate the excellence you bring to support.
I see that your project is under development. If there are externalities I should know about that impact the integrity of the data, I would appreciate hearing about them (rick at ontopofit.net).
Again, many thanks.
Rick
