Jump to content

AgentGOD

Members
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Days Won

    1
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by AgentGOD

  1. is that cached?

    No, the mirror test server is just down :P

    Here's a test from TMN primary server:

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 19992 Kbps about 20 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2440 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/04/01 - 1:56pm

    Bottom Line:: 349X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.42 sec

    Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.49 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 203.78 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KWSXN259G

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]

  2. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 66256 Kbps about 66.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 8088 kB/s

    Test Time:: 2009/04/01 - 1:41pm

    Bottom Line:: 1155X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.13 sec

    Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 2.593 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 906.93 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DONFR53TZ

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]

  3. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 20822 Kbps about 20.8 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2542 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/03/27 - 5:06pm

    Bottom Line:: 363X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.4 sec

    Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.072 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 216.4 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RUW8GSTJP

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]

    Looks like my best score yet.

  4. ::::::::::::::::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Download Connection is:: 20157 Kbps about 20.16 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2461 kB/s

    Upload Connection is:: 4447 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 543 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/03/27 - 1:03pm

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-G3BL0TVYH

    U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XF9AR1UN3

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    share2-G3BL0TVYH

    Verizon FiOS FTW! Btw, this is also tested over Wireless!

  5. Good news mate. Your temporary fix/workaround worked! The STB is now responding very quickly to the remote commands while the TV is on and seeing the OSD.

    Thanks, this should be stickied somewhere :)

    So you're saying that the TV manufacturer has to issue a fixed firmware to solve this problem permanently?

  6. There are several models of LCD TV's that emit a signal that interferes with the infra red signals to Motorola Cable boxes.

    This is probably the same issue.

    I will try to find the memo - it was sent out at work and the memo noted that all of the manufacturers are aware and working to resolve the issues.

    So you're an employee of a manufacturer?

  7. What wireless protocol are you using? N or G?

    G. The FiOS router is the provisioned Verizon one.

    I'm connecting my gaming rig wirelessly to the FiOS router via Wireless Bridge with the WRT54GL w/ DD-WRT V24 SP1. It seems that boosting the TX Power increased my speed dramatically. Now it's almost just as fast as wired.

    These two routers are separated by a wall. The WRT54GL is in my room, with my gaming rig wired to it, and the Actiontec is in another room nearby, with Coax connected to it, with some wired PCs ("work PCs").

  8. On a wired PC... I'm able to hit full speed:

    ::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Download Connection is:: 20405 Kbps about 20.4 Mbps (tested with 25598 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2491 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/03/26 - 2:37pm

    Bottom Line:: 356X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.41 sec

    Tested from a 25598 kB file and took 10.277 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 210.15 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UYMRPEZG0

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    :-

    EDIT:

    Hmm... boosted the Tx Power from 70 mW to 96 mW got me:

    :::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::::::::::

    Download Connection is:: 19530 Kbps about 19.5 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2384 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/03/26 - 2:51pm

    Bottom Line:: 341X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.43 sec

    Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.738 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 196.85 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K34GFV8H0

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    Looks like that was the solution?

    speedz.png

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 20760 Kbps about 20.8 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 2534 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2009/03/26 - 2:56pm

    Bottom Line:: 362X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.4 sec

    Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.102 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 215.55 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K1MOWJ0BZ

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3) Gecko/20090305 Firefox/3.1b3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]

  9. RF interference issue?  Move the FIOS box over a few feet if you can.

    There are some cable boxes that have issues with the TV and channels will change themselves on the cable box.

    I doubt it's interference. I tried hooking up the HD box via RF (Coaxial to TV, channel 3), and HDMI. The problem occurs with HDMI, but not with Coaxial! That's interesting. But obviously, I can not be using channel 3 to watch HD channels... it downscales. I also tried four different HDMI cables, each one yielded same result. I also tried various HDMI ports, same thing.

  10. have you tried reprogramming the remote?

    Every time i have a problem with a remote all i do is reprogram it and then it works.

    Yea, I tried the remote factory reset, no help. Still the same.

    To clear up something: if I have both the box and the TV on at the same time, the box ignores all commands from the remote. However, right when I turn the TV off, it starts responding to the remote again. I can, at that point, change the channel to say, Discovery HD, and then turn the TV back on.... and presto... Discovery HD!

    Help......

  11. I followed everything step by step, and finally turned on the STB. I got picture via HDMI on my TV. However, the STB does not respond to the remote. Pressing the "STB" button, and "Channel Up" did nothing.

    HOWEVER, I found that if I turned off the TV, and press Channel Up, it worked. It worked every time.

    Help?

    TV is a Philips 42PFL7403D 120 Hz 1080P HDTV

    STB is the Motorola HD 7100

×
×
  • Create New...