REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 I have quest dsl now, and I am supposed to get 7000/864. I have ran TCP Optimaizer and sellected PPoE, but mine is PPoA is that a problem? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1025 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 125 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Jan 09 2006 21:22:48 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB download in 8.19 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 42.62 % of your hosts average (qwest.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2GVWRIJYH :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 425 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 52 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Jan 09 2006 21:24:42 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 19.69 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 89.29 % of your hosts average (qwest.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-J6UQRK5D1 What can I do? I have odne all things int eh sticky topic, though, I read you are supposed to take off the limit for # of TCP connections form SP2, it's set to 10, but what should I put it to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Welcome to the forum REDJ. Please click HERE and HERE and post all info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 TCP options string = 020405ac0103030301010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 522720 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6) Unscaled Receive Window = 65340 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 20908.8 kbps (2613.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 8363.52 kbps (1045.44 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 52 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) The current date is: Mon 01/09/2006 The current time is: 21:29:59.48 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 131ms, Average = 120ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 40 ms 38 ms 38 ms dlth-dsl-gw01-193.dlth.qwest.net [65.102.106.193] 3 40 ms 38 ms 38 ms dlth-agw1.inet.qwest.net [65.102.106.93] 4 41 ms 39 ms 39 ms dth-core-01.inet.qwest.net [207.109.192.241] 5 81 ms 112 ms 108 ms mpl-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.5.117] 6 69 ms 68 ms 68 ms cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.8.18] 7 69 ms 68 ms 68 ms cer-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.62] 8 68 ms 68 ms 69 ms qwest-gw.cgcil.ip.att.net [192.205.32.97] 9 114 ms 133 ms 141 ms tbr2-p012201.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.38] 10 136 ms 162 ms 174 ms tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.46] 11 127 ms 123 ms 136 ms 12.122.9.141 12 206 ms 147 ms 245 ms tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90] 13 151 ms 177 ms 151 ms gar1-p370.dlrtx.ip.att.net [12.123.196.97] 14 114 ms 107 ms 96 ms 12.119.136.14 15 81 ms 82 ms 82 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 16 83 ms 83 ms 82 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 17 82 ms 80 ms 83 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 18 147 ms 173 ms 166 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 That trace is looking a little slow for a 7M package. Do you have a router? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Yes, but I am not using it, the firewall on the modem is turned off and I am using sygate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Yes, but I am not using it, the firewall on the modem is turned off and I am using sygate. So what you are saying is that your PC is connected directly to your DSL modem? Try this line packet loss test: http://www.dslreports.com/tools Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Test ran for about 1 hour and did not complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Maybe shut down sygate and try again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Test ran for 45 minutes and did not complete. I have no other firewalls running. Whewn the guy hooked it up I said I only had 13dB going into my phone line, that was for outside where the phone line comes into the house. I also have 13dB at the phone jack with a barnd new phone cord and new modem. I could literally throw a rock and hit one of their serveers if ti was outside, hat's how close I am to them. Any ideas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Have you run virus and spyware scans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 I have done both, virus in safe mode with networking and spyware both in normal and safe mode with networking. Is there some settings that may be messed up int he registry? I'm used to cable with a MTU of 1500, and now mine is set to 1492, is theer a way to test if this is the problem? and the MTU I should have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 That's where I was going next. Clear the values from TCP Optimizer, save and reboot. Get cablenut here: www.cablenut.com The download the file below. Open it up, click save to registry in the adjuster window, reboot and retest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdf216 Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 40 ms 38 ms 38 ms dlth-dsl-gw01-193.dlth.qwest.net [65.102.106.193] 3 40 ms 38 ms 38 ms dlth-agw1.inet.qwest.net [65.102.106.93] 4 41 ms 39 ms 39 ms dth-core-01.inet.qwest.net [207.109.192.241] 5 81 ms 112 ms 108 ms mpl-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.5.117] What you should really be concerned with is that very first hop. that is the hop between your computer, or router and your modem. and it's timing out. that is not a good sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5581 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 681 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Jan 09 2006 23:30:02 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 100X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.5 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 132.06 % faster than the average for host (qwest.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8N0JPTQ12 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 783 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 96 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Mon Jan 09 2006 23:31:20 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 10.67 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 64.15 % faster than the average for host (qwest.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JO5LHIQCN YOUS A GOD! REDJ LIKE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDJ Posted January 10, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 Will I have to change any of these settings if I start adding multiple computers and a router? I normally have 3- 4 on the net the same time. I know if I want them to have as good connection as me I should give tem the cablenut settings, but will they change if more comps and a router are added? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdf216 Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 You won't have to change any of those settings, however I do reccommend you use those same settings on every computer in your network. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 What you should really be concerned with is that very first hop. that is the hop between your computer, or router and your modem. and it's timing out. that is not a good sign. It's usually a firewall blocking ICMP traffic. Could definitely be causing slowdowns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.