Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
scumbucketsex

hi im new here, sorry to bother you all but is this right?

Recommended Posts

have made the changes mate, this is out they turn out

Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 467 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 57 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

Test Time:: Sun Feb 5 20:49:29 UTC 2006

Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 17.96 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 38.15 % of your hosts average (ntli.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MXKN96BIC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your IP  appears to be behind a web proxy server  and results shown might not be for your system.

TCP options string = 020405b40103030101010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 128480

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2)

Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

64240 (MSS x 44) 

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 5139.2 kbps (642.4 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your TCP Window limits you to: 2055.68 kbps (256.96 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 59 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d

click START to begin

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.81Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 474.09kb/s

Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem

Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_04

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Full Duplex mode

Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 623.12 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

There were 22 packets retransmitted, 55 duplicate acks received, and 83 SACK blocks received

The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time.

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WEB100 Kernel Variables:

Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

AckPktsIn: 250

AckPktsOut: 0

BytesRetrans: 32120

CongAvoid: 90

CongestionOverCount: 0

CongestionSignals: 1

CountRTT: 176

CurCwnd: 48180

CurMSS: 1460

CurRTO: 1140

CurRwinRcvd: 128480

CurRwinSent: 16304

CurSsthresh: 43800

DSACKDups: 0

DataBytesIn: 0

DataBytesOut: 665760

DataPktsIn: 0

DataPktsOut: 456

DupAcksIn: 55

ECNEnabled: 0

FastRetran: 1

MaxCwnd: 87600

MaxMSS: 1460

MaxRTO: 1350

MaxRTT: 940

MaxRwinRcvd: 128480

MaxRwinSent: 16304

MaxSsthresh: 43800

MinMSS: 1460

MinRTO: 560

MinRTT: 190

MinRwinRcvd: 64240

MinRwinSent: 16304

NagleEnabled: 1

OtherReductions: 0

PktsIn: 250

PktsOut: 456

PktsRetrans: 22

X_Rcvbuf: 103424

RcvWinScale: 7

SACKEnabled: 3

SACKsRcvd: 83

SendStall: 0

SlowStart: 76

SampleRTT: 780

SmoothedRTT: 790

X_Sndbuf: 103424

SndWinScale: 1

SndLimTimeRwin: 0

SndLimTimeCwnd: 10106849

SndLimTimeSender: 2585

SndLimTransRwin: 0

SndLimTransCwnd: 1

SndLimTransSender: 1

SndLimBytesRwin: 0

SndLimBytesCwnd: 665760

SndLimBytesSender: 0

SubsequentTimeouts: 0

SumRTT: 109670

Timeouts: 0

TimestampsEnabled: 0

WinScaleRcvd: 1

WinScaleSent: 7

DupAcksOut: 0

StartTimeUsec: 137629

Duration: 10112201

c2sData: 2

c2sAck: 2

s2cData: 9

s2cAck: 2

half_duplex: 0

link: 100

congestion: 1

bad_cable: 0

mismatch: 0

spd: 0.00

bw: 0.38

loss: 0.002192982

avgrtt: 623.12

waitsec: 0.00

timesec: 10.00

order: 0.2200

rwintime: 0.0000

sendtime: 0.0003

cwndtime: 0.9997

rwin: 0.9802

swin: 64.0000

cwin: 0.6683

rttsec: 0.623125

Sndbuf: 8388608

aspd: 2.29277

Checking for mismatch on uplink

(speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5]

(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01]

Checking for excessive errors condition

(loss/sec > .15) [2.19>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],

(loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [43800>0]

Checking for 10 Mbps link

(speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]

(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for Wireless link

(sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]

(Estimate > 50 [0.38>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]

(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

(speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

(SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for half-duplex condition

(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],

(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]

Checking for congestion

(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

(MaxSsthresh > 0) [43800>0]

estimate = 0.38 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 623.12msec, and loss = 0.002192982

The theoretical network limit is 0.38 Mbps

The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 102.70 Mbps

Your PC/Workstation has a 125.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.57 Mbps

The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.07 Mbps

Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is what i got when i did the trace route before

Analysis:

Number of hops: 14

Last hop responding to ICMP: 13, UDP: 14, TCP: 13.

There appears to be a firewall at  (hop 14) that blocks ICMP (ping) packets.

The destination appears to block unwanted TCP packets.

Legend:

T1/T2/T3 are the round-trip times in milliseconds (1/1000ths of a second).

T1 uses a proper ICMP-based tracert (Microsoft style). T2 uses a UDP-based traceroute (Unix-style). T3 uses a TCP-based traceroute (port 80).

Since many ISPs now block ICMP and/or packets to unknown ports, T3 (not used by many traceroute programs) typically shows the best results.

Best times may be theoretical (if it takes 80ms to hop 10, and 50ms to hop 11, we say the best time for hop 10 is 50ms).

If no reverse DNS entry is given for an IP, we display 'unknown.example.com' if the domain name is known.

shall i do it again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hop T1 T2 T3 Best Graph IP Hostname Dist TTL Ctry Time

1 0 0 0 0.4 ms     

66.36.240.2 AS14361

HOPONE-DCA  c-vl102-d1.acc.dca2.hopone.net.  255 US Unknown: 82e7f27e

2 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms]   

66.36.224.232 AS0

IANA-RSVD-0  gec2.core1.dca2.hopone.net.  0 miles [+0]  254 US Unknown: 84d78ae3

3 5 5 5 5.7 ms [+5ms]   

66.36.224.174 AS0

IANA-RSVD-0  cw.peer.nyc2.hopone.net.  0 miles [+0]  252 US Unix: 22:11:12.499

4 6 5 19 5.9 ms [+0ms]   

195.2.3.13 AS1273

CW  so-3-0-0-dcr1.nyk.cw.net.  0 miles [+0]  251 EU Unix: 22:11:12.527

5 103 81 81 81 ms [+75ms]   

195.2.10.110 AS1273

CW  so-2-0-0-dcr2.tsd.cw.net.  0 miles [+0]  250 EU Unix: 22:11:12.702

6 84 82 92 82 ms [+0ms]   

195.2.10.61 AS1273

CW  so-5-0-0-bcr1.tsd.cw.net.  0 miles [+0]  249 EU Unix: 22:11:12.783

7 83 83 83 82 ms [+0ms]   

166.63.211.150 AS1273

CW  ntl1.tsd.cw.net.  0 miles [+0]  248 US Unix: 22:03:39.575

8 87 82 82 82 ms [+0ms]   

62.253.185.97 AS5089

NTL  nth-bb-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com.  0 miles [+0]  248 UK Unix: 22:10:20.153

9 218 84 98 84 ms [+2ms]   

62.253.188.226 AS5089

NTL  pete-t2core-a-pos31.inet.ntl.com.  0 miles [+0]  245 UK Unix: 22:11:13.225

10 346 144 134 134 ms [+49ms]   

80.3.129.14 AS5089

NTL  pete-bam-1-ge100.inet.ntl.com.  0 miles [+0]  246 UK Unix: 22:11:13. 38

11 * * * 99999 ms [+99999ms]   

[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond]  0 miles [+0]       

12 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]   

[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond]  0 miles [+0]       

13 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]   

[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond]  0 miles [+0]       

14 * * * 99999 ms [+0ms]   

[unknown] [unknown - Firewall did not respond]

[4 hops with no response:

assuming we hit a firewall

that blocks pings]  0 miles [+0]       

15                     

Analysis:

Number of hops: 14

Last hop responding to ICMP: 10, UDP: 10, TCP: 10.

There appears to be a firewall right after (hop 10) that blocks ICMP, unwanted UDP, and unwanted TCP packets.

Legend:

T1/T2/T3 are the round-trip times in milliseconds (1/1000ths of a second).

T1 uses a proper ICMP-based tracert (Microsoft style). T2 uses a UDP-based traceroute (Unix-style). T3 uses a TCP-based traceroute (port 80).

Since many ISPs now block ICMP and/or packets to unknown ports, T3 (not used by many traceroute programs) typically shows the best results.

Best times may be theoretical (if it takes 80ms to hop 10, and 50ms to hop 11, we say the best time for hop 10 is 50ms).

If no reverse DNS entry is given for an IP, we display 'unknown.example.com' if the domain name is known.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...