Jump to content

BIG BIG problems


lanceifer

Recommended Posts

is there a way to set all my windows settings back to default???,  or to remove all my net work things with out having to redo my whole windows set up?????? mabee iof i just reset every thing back to default and start from scratch it would be easyer to figure out??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windows sets RWIN to a default value of 17520 Kbytes and it has a function that can negotiate and adjust RWIN value to a max of just over 64000 Kbytes. This is ok if our subscribed bandwidths are not much higher than 2 Mbps and latency not exceeding 300 ms. Occasionally, some problems may occur when the negotiations and auto adjustments fail.

But for bandwidths of 3 Mbps and more, optimum throughput can never be achieved.

If say, your subscribed bandwidth is 6 Mbps, you will unlikely to achieve even half that bandwidth with Windows default.

Using the RWIN formula,

RWIN = bandwidth x latency divided by 8 (bit) = ________ Kbytes

So if RWIN = 65000 and latency is 200 ms

Bandwidth = 65000 x 8 / 200 = 2600 Kbps

This is why we need to tweak to get optimum throughput and speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok i have moved every thing around in my work area, and installed a new video card which ment i had to move my network card down a slot and here are my new tests.

download test:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 2781 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Download Speed is:: 340 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2)

Test Time:: Tue Feb 14 12:35:52 CST 2006

Bottom Line:: 50X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3.01 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 58.36 % of your hosts average (comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-00DCBSWQG

upload test:

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 150 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 18 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

Test Time:: Tue Feb 14 12:36:52 CST 2006

Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 56.89 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 43.48 % of your hosts average (comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0Q8DSIKCV

tcp/ip analizer:

SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

TCP properties for IP = 66.41.214.70 ()

Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b40103030001010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits

Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

64240 (MSS x 44) <-- current value

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your TCP Window limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 50 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00100000 (32)

Precedence (priority) = 001 (priority)

Delay = 0 (normal delay)

Throughput = 0 (normal throughput)

Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)

Cost = 0 (normal cost)

Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero)

DiffServ (RFC 2474) = CS1 001000 (8) - class 1 (RFC 2474). Similar forwarding behavior to the ToS Precedence field.

nitro:

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 120.24Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.61Mb/s

------  Client System Details  ------

OS data: Name = Windows 2000, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.0

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Full Duplex mode

No network congestion discovered.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 270.13 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

No packet loss was observed.

This connection is receiver limited 77.58% of the time.

This connection is network limited 22.39% of the time.

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

Server says [66.41.214.70] but Client says [192.168.0.101]

nitro more details:

WEB100 Kernel Variables:

Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

AckPktsIn: 693

AckPktsOut: 0

BytesRetrans: 0

CongAvoid: 0

CongestionOverCount: 0

CongestionSignals: 0

CountRTT: 693

CurCwnd: 65700

CurMSS: 1460

CurRTO: 950

CurRwinRcvd: 64240

CurRwinSent: 16304

CurSsthresh: 2147483647

DSACKDups: 0

DataBytesIn: 0

DataBytesOut: 2054220

DataPktsIn: 0

DataPktsOut: 1407

DupAcksIn: 0

ECNEnabled: 0

FastRetran: 0

MaxCwnd: 65700

MaxMSS: 1460

MaxRTO: 1710

MaxRTT: 810

MaxRwinRcvd: 64240

MaxRwinSent: 16304

MaxSsthresh: 0

MinMSS: 1460

MinRTO: 370

MinRTT: 80

MinRwinRcvd: 64240

MinRwinSent: 16304

NagleEnabled: 1

OtherReductions: 1

PktsIn: 693

PktsOut: 1407

PktsRetrans: 0

X_Rcvbuf: 103424

RcvWinScale: 7

SACKEnabled: 3

SACKsRcvd: 0

SendStall: 0

SlowStart: 44

SampleRTT: 410

SmoothedRTT: 410

X_Sndbuf: 103424

SndWinScale: 0

SndLimTimeRwin: 7968791

SndLimTimeCwnd: 2300350

SndLimTimeSender: 2581

SndLimTransRwin: 1

SndLimTransCwnd: 1

SndLimTransSender: 1

SndLimBytesRwin: 1877560

SndLimBytesCwnd: 176660

SndLimBytesSender: 0

SubsequentTimeouts: 0

SumRTT: 187200

Timeouts: 0

TimestampsEnabled: 0

WinScaleRcvd: 0

WinScaleSent: 7

DupAcksOut: 0

StartTimeUsec: 56957

Duration: 10275205

c2sData: 2

c2sAck: 2

s2cData: 9

s2cAck: 3

half_duplex: 0

link: 100

congestion: 0

bad_cable: 0

mismatch: 0

spd: 0.00

bw: 41.24

loss: 0.000001000

avgrtt: 270.13

waitsec: 0.00

timesec: 10.00

order: 0.0000

rwintime: 0.7758

sendtime: 0.0003

cwndtime: 0.2239

rwin: 0.4901

swin: 0.7891

cwin: 0.5013

rttsec: 0.270130

Sndbuf: 103424

aspd: 23.40717

Checking for mismatch on uplink

(speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.12<5]

(rwintime > .9) [0.77>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01]

Checking for excessive errors condition

(loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.22>.6],

(loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0]

Checking for 10 Mbps link

(speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]

(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.12<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for Wireless link

(sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]

(Estimate > 50 [41.24>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.77>.90]

(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

(speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

(SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for half-duplex condition

(rwintime > .95) [0.77>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30],

(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]

Checking for congestion

(cwndtime > .02) [0.22>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

(MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0]

estimate = 41.24 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 270.13msec, and loss = 1.0E-6

The theoretical network limit is 41.24 Mbps

The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 2.92 Mbps

Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.81 Mbps

The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.85 Mbps

Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'

any other settings any one can think of to help out????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...