ROGMAN Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 TCP options string = 020405a00103030001010402 MTU = 1480 MTU is optimized for Windows XP PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1440 MSS is optimized for Windows XP PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 63360 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 63360 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 506880 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 253440 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 126720 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63360 (MSS x 44) <-- current value bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2534.4 kbps (316.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1013.76 kbps (126.72 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 58 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) I have tried every rwin value listed here ^^^^^^^^ with no results. Started top to bottom. Running 63360 now. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1372 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 167 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 21 22:15:46 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 24X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.13 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 3.63 % faster than the average for host (fastfreedom.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5ALRNUIF3 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.24Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.44Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet Information: The receive buffer should be 238.83 Kbytes to maximize throughput I have wireless. with 3000 Kbps, how fast should I be able to download a 1 MB file ? thanks for any help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 See if your MTU can be higher than 1480. Try the following with the TCP Optmizer (www.speedguide.net): General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU 1492 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window -63888 MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - uncheck Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROGMAN Posted February 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1284 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 157 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 21 22:50:17 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.52 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 96.98 % of your hosts average (fastfreedom.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5W2VZX8BG ZIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can download the 20.5 MB test in 2 mins 1 second. Little over 10 MB per minute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 Use the TCP Optimizer to find your largest MTU and also Latency. And post your results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROGMAN Posted February 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 40 bytes ->bytes=40 time=310ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 750 bytes ->bytes=750 time=85ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1125 bytes ->bytes=1125 time=77ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1312 bytes ->bytes=1312 time=94ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1406 bytes ->bytes=1406 time=64ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1453 bytes -> ..fragmented Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1430 bytes ->bytes=1430 time=112ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1441 bytes ->bytes=1441 time=60ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1447 bytes ->bytes=1447 time=60ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1450 bytes ->bytes=1450 time=92ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1451 bytes ->Request Timed Out Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1451 bytes ->bytes=1451 time=552ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 1452 bytes ->bytes=1452 time=60ms TTL=53 The largest possible non-fragmented packet is 1452 (1480 - 28 ICMP & IP headers). You can set your MTU to 1480 Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=240 Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=240 Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=240 Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=234ms TTL=49 Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=49 Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=49 Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=52 Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=52 Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=52 Pinging [207.155.252.39] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=241 Pinging [207.155.252.39] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=241 Pinging [207.155.252.39] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=241 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=53 Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for above hosts: Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15, Lost = 0 (0% loss) Approximate round trip times (RTT) in milli-seconds: Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 268ms, Average = 123ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 Are you located overseas? Your Latency is rather high. Your MTU is fixed at 1480. You can raise it to 1492 using below: http://www.raspppoe.com/ In the mean time use TCP Optimizer and do the following for MTU 1480 and latency of 200 ms: General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU 1480 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window - 126720 MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - check Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROGMAN Posted February 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1246 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 152 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 21 23:28:32 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.74 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 94.11 % of your hosts average (fastfreedom.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4TP8U5OQL I'm not overseas. Right in the good old U.S.A. Like I said I have wireless. I'm about 1 mile from the tv station tower where i recieve the signal from. I have a direct, unobstructed sightline to the tower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 Here is a post regarding a possible fix on wireless interference: http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=11877.0 Once your latency gets back to normal, use TCP Optimizer with the following changes: TCP window size - 63360 Window scaling - uncheck If wireless interefence is minimal, your speed should be 80-90% of advertised and time to download a 1 MB file should be within 3+ seconds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROGMAN Posted February 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 That post doesn't give any specifics, and I don't have a router. It goes from the tower, to a retangular box on my roof, into my house, into a small plastic box, then from the plastic box to my Earthnet adaptor in back of my computer. Mabey I should wait and call my ISP tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 You subscribed to Earthlink DSL. Sorry, I am not familiar with the expected performance or weakness of this system. Perhaps members in the Earthlink forum section can assist: http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?board=23.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.