DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer TCP properties for IP = **.***.***.*** () Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405b40103030301010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 312440 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 39055 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 12497.6 Kbps (1562.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 4999.04 Kbps (624.88 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 52 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5969 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 729 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 11:42:50 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 107X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.4 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 39.11 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-U304QF5N2 WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 2425 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 39420 CongAvoid: 1693 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 2075 CurCwnd: 83220 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 290 CurRwinRcvd: 312440 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 75920 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 8692840 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 5954 DupAcksIn: 336 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 305140 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 400 MaxRTT: 210 MaxRwinRcvd: 312440 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 151840 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 280 MinRTT: 80 MinRwinRcvd: 39055 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 23 PktsIn: 2425 PktsOut: 5954 PktsRetrans: 27 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 370 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 357 SampleRTT: 90 SmoothedRTT: 90 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 3 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10012617 SndLimTimeSender: 3382 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 8692840 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 199280 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 3 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 322602 Duration: 10019089 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 6.33 loss: 0.000335909 avgrtt: 96.04 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.1386 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.9997 rwin: 2.3837 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 2.3280 rttsec: 0.096039 Sndbuf: 8388608 aspd: 12.34553 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.62<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [3.35<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [3.35>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [3.35<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [151840>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.62<9.5] (loss < .01) [3.35<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [6.33>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [151840>0] estimate = 6.33 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 96.04msec, and loss = 3.35909E-4 The theoretical network limit is 6.33 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 666.39 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 305.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 24.82 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 24.24 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' The current date is: Thu 02/23/2006 The current time is: 11:12:53.85 Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 33ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.101.160.1 2 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms gig1-0.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.14.1] 3 9 ms 9 ms 7 ms pos6-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr3.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.8.133] 4 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms pos5-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr4.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.8.130] 5 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms so-9-1.car2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.79.174.1] 6 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms ae-2-56.mp2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.104.161] 7 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.110] 8 32 ms 31 ms 32 ms ae-23-54.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.111] 9 32 ms 34 ms 33 ms 4.78.221.146 10 32 ms 34 ms 33 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 11 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 12 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 13 34 ms 33 ms 34 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. C:>netstat -a Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign Address State TCP rap:epmap rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:microsoft-ds rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1027 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1028 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1029 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1030 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3005 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3006 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3012 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3330 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:netbios-ssn rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1025 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1025 rap:1028 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1025 rap:3005 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1026 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1026 rap:1029 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1026 rap:3006 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1028 rap:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1029 rap:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3005 rap:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3006 rap:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3329 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3329 rap:3330 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3330 rap:3329 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:netbios-ssn rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3002 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3003 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3004 rap:0 LISTENING UDP rap:microsoft-ds *:* UDP rap:3001 *:* UDP rap:netbios-ns *:* UDP rap:netbios-dgm *:* UDP rap:isakmp *:* UDP rap:4500 *:* UDP rap:domain *:* UDP rap:bootps *:* UDP rap:bootpc *:* UDP rap:netbios-ns *:* UDP rap:netbios-dgm *:* UDP rap:isakmp *:* UDP rap:4500 *:* Out BGP (port 119, 23, 80, 3128, etc) 2 ae3.j3.iad.scnet.net (66.225.244.245) 9.938 ms 9.904 ms 9.888 ms 3 unknown.iad.scnet.net (205.234.224.18) 10.005 ms 9.180 ms 9.924 ms 4 pop3-ash-P8-0.atdn.net (66.185.148.217) 9.979 ms 9.120 ms 9.979 ms 5 bb1-ash-P2-0.atdn.net (66.185.148.208) 9.870 ms 9.342 ms 9.959 ms 6 bb1-vie-P11-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.99) 9.911 ms 9.845 ms 9.948 ms 7 bb1-rdu-P4-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.14) 47.916 ms 194.164 ms 199.617 ms 8 bb2-rdu-P2-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.3) 20.336 ms 20.697 ms 20.783 ms 9 bb2-atm-P6-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.30) 20.777 ms 20.933 ms 20.689 ms 10 bb1-tby-P7-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.244) 37.991 ms 38.062 ms 37.946 ms 11 pop2-tby-P0-3.atdn.net (66.185.138.209) 37.141 ms 37.194 ms 37.058 ms 12 rr-tampa.atdn.net (66.185.132.2) 37.577 ms 37.412 ms 37.679 ms 13 pos15-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.138) 38.440 ms 38.435 ms 38.564 ms 14 gig0-3.tampflm54-ubr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.15.141) 39.962 ms 40.218 ms 39.990 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * Out SC (port 7000) 2 ae4.j3.iad.scnet.net (66.225.244.161) 9.277 ms 9.565 ms 9.885 ms 3 so6-1-0.j3.iad.scnet.net (66.225.244.146) 9.896 ms 9.083 ms 10.239 ms 4 pop3-ash-P8-0.atdn.net (66.185.148.217) 9.563 ms 10.046 ms 9.845 ms 5 bb1-ash-P2-0.atdn.net (66.185.148.208) 9.899 ms 9.476 ms 9.855 ms 6 bb1-vie-P11-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.99) 9.919 ms 9.905 ms 9.856 ms 7 bb1-rdu-P4-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.14) 20.725 ms 20.697 ms 20.846 ms 8 bb2-rdu-P2-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.3) 20.732 ms 20.680 ms 20.826 ms 9 bb2-atm-P6-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.30) 147.842 ms 185.272 ms 199.181 ms 10 bb1-tby-P7-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.244) 37.993 ms 37.931 ms 37.930 ms 11 pop2-tby-P0-3.atdn.net (66.185.138.209) 37.180 ms 37.197 ms 37.290 ms 12 rr-tampa.atdn.net (66.185.132.2) 37.340 ms 37.512 ms 37.468 ms 13 pos15-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.138) 38.881 ms 37.940 ms 38.517 ms 14 gig0-3.tampflm54-ubr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.15.141) 40.254 ms 40.308 ms 40.083 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * Out Cogent (port 8000) 2 g3-0.core01.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.112.21.237) 9.802 ms 9.901 ms 10.033 ms 3 p11-0.core02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.197) 163.227 ms 9.539 ms 18.223 ms 4 p6-0.core01.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.82) 9.501 ms 10.782 ms 10.614 ms 5 ge-7-13.car1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.111.45) 11.403 ms 11.376 ms 11.946 ms 6 ae-1-55.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.97.129) 11.879 ms 11.648 ms 11.788 ms 7 as-0-0.mp2.Tampa1.Level3.net (209.247.11.198) 41.142 ms 43.015 ms 43.421 ms 8 ae-21-56.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.68.104.169) 43.483 ms 42.167 ms 38.543 ms 9 TIME-WARNER.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (209.0.96.2) 45.761 ms 44.280 ms 45.167 ms 10 pos12-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.134) 45.360 ms 43.907 ms 44.539 ms 11 gig0-2.tampflm54-ubr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.14.141) 46.274 ms 46.432 ms 46.715 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * Out BtN (port 9000) 2 ge13-2.br02.ash01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.94.129) 9.393 ms 28.946 ms 9.132 ms 3 pop1-ash-G2-2-4.atdn.net (66.185.144.205) 10.016 ms 9.928 ms 9.775 ms 4 bb2-ash-P0-0.atdn.net (66.185.144.194) 9.481 ms 9.109 ms 9.947 ms 5 bb2-vie-P11-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.101) 9.935 ms 9.640 ms 9.858 ms 6 bb1-atm-P3-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.33) 19.684 ms 19.726 ms 19.623 ms 7 bb1-tby-P7-0.atdn.net (66.185.152.244) 37.359 ms 58.669 ms 36.933 ms 8 pop2-tby-P0-3.atdn.net (66.185.138.209) 36.076 ms 35.991 ms 36.175 ms 9 rr-tampa.atdn.net (66.185.132.2) 36.462 ms 36.441 ms 36.344 ms 10 pos15-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.138) 37.280 ms 39.318 ms 37.463 ms 11 gig0-3.tampflm54-ubr2.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.15.141) 39.081 ms 38.434 ms 38.955 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Welcome to the forum, DigitalRapture. Please start HERE, and try everything. Looks like you could do without a few that are processes running, judging from the netstat. Be sure to check out Cablenut. If you have any other tweaking apps, clear the values and save the null state. If you look in VanBuren's Cablenut Settings V.8, there is a Cable & DSL 10000 which would be perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Ok. I ran MSConfig and deleted most of the startup programs. I also ran the Cable & DSL 10000.css file. I'm getting a little better speeds: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7535 Kbps about 7.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 920 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 12:55:09 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 135X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.11 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 75.6 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1ZQMLXBWF but what about all the ports open in netstat..how do I get rid of these? C:>netstat -a Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign Address State TCP rap:epmap rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:microsoft-ds rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1027 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1028 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1029 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1030 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3005 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3006 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3009 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3012 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:netbios-ssn rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1025 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1025 rap:1028 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1025 rap:3005 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1026 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:1026 rap:1029 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1026 rap:3006 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1028 rap:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:1029 rap:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3005 rap:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3006 rap:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3011 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3011 rap:3012 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:3012 rap:3011 ESTABLISHED TCP rap:netbios-ssn rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3002 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3003 rap:0 LISTENING TCP rap:3004 rap:0 LISTENING UDP rap:microsoft-ds *:* UDP rap:3001 *:* UDP rap:netbios-ns *:* UDP rap:netbios-dgm *:* UDP rap:isakmp *:* UDP rap:4500 *:* UDP rap:domain *:* UDP rap:bootps *:* UDP rap:bootpc *:* UDP rap:netbios-ns *:* UDP rap:netbios-dgm *:* UDP rap:isakmp *:* UDP rap:4500 *:* Also, after shutting down EZ Firewall, my speeds increase even more: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8756 Kbps about 8.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1069 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 13:01:18 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 156X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 104.05 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SPRNTKH7M Should I try a different firewall? Any suggestions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 I imagine some of those established connections are affecting your speeds. Try a netstat -ano (if you post, omit local address). Notice the PID. If you go to your task manager, processes tab, click view, set columns, you can check the box to show PID. This way you can check out which processes are making those connections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 I'm running Win2000, and that netstat command doesn't work for me..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Oh ok. Did you run Ccleaner? Try this online test to make sure you are malware free: www.ewido.net/en/onlinescan/ Do you have a firewall running? IM, P2P, etc? Try the test without those things running. What does your traceroute look like: tracert www.testmy.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Yeah I've ran all the tests, I'm clean. I'll try the test again w/o my EZ Firewall on. No IM or P2P running. Also, my computer's role is set to a Workstation.. I'm sure this affects it..how do I change this, I forgot. Here's my tracert: C:>tracert www.testmy.net Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 6 ms 6 ms 7 ms 10.101.160.1 2 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms gig1-0.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.14.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms pos6-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr3.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.8.133] 4 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms pos5-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr4.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.8.130] 5 128 ms 84 ms 9 ms so-9-1.car2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.79.174.1] 6 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms ae-2-56.mp2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.104.161] 7 31 ms 32 ms 30 ms ae-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.110] 8 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae-13-55.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.143] 9 33 ms 33 ms 34 ms 4.78.221.146 10 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 11 35 ms 32 ms 34 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 12 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 13 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Nice trace. I've used the EZ Firewall, good software but it does affect your speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 I ran netstat -an, which works on win2000, and got this: C:>netstat -an Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign Address State TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1027 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1028 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1029 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1030 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3005 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3006 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3012 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3802 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3804 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3806 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3807 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3809 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3810 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP * :139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP * :3802 64.233.187.104:80 ESTABLISHED TCP * :3804 64.233.187.104:80 ESTABLISHED TCP * :3806 209.59.135.78:80 ESTABLISHED TCP * :3807 209.59.135.78:80 ESTABLISHED TCP * :3809 207.97.192.161:80 ESTABLISHED TCP *:3810 207.97.192.161:80 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1025 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:1025 127.0.0.1:1028 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1025 127.0.0.1:3005 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1026 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:1026 127.0.0.1:1029 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1026 127.0.0.1:3006 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1028 127.0.0.1:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:1029 127.0.0.1:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:3005 127.0.0.1:1025 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:3006 127.0.0.1:1026 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:3011 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:3011 127.0.0.1:3012 ESTABLISHED TCP 127.0.0.1:3012 127.0.0.1:3011 ESTABLISHED TCP 192.168.0.1:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3002 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3003 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3004 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING UDP 0.0.0.0:445 *:* UDP 0.0.0.0:3001 *:* UDP * :137 *:* UDP * :138 *:* UDP * :500 *:* UDP * :4500 *:* UDP 127.0.0.1:3658 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:53 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:67 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:68 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:137 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:138 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:500 *:* UDP 192.168.0.1:4500 *:* and this: C:>netstat -an |find /i "listening" TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1027 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1028 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1029 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:1030 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3005 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3006 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 0.0.0.0:3012 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP *:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:1025 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:1026 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 127.0.0.1:3011 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3002 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3003 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP 192.168.0.1:3004 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING also, the only thing showing up on CCleaner is tracking cookies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Try this. Extract both files to the same directory, run test.bat and post the log. http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=12090.0;attach=10669 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 ftp> Connected to rrweb2.tampabay.rr.com. open test.tampabay.rr.com 220------------------------------------------------------------------------ 220-| *********WARNING********* | 220-|This system is restricted solely to Road Runner authorized personnel | 220-|for legitimate business purposes only. The actual or attempted | 220-|unauthorized access, use or modification of this system is strictly | 220-|prohibited. Unauthorized personnel are subject to Road Runner | 220-|disciplinary proceedings and/or criminal and civil penalties under | 220-|state, federal or other applicable domestic and foreign laws. The use| 220-|of this system is monitored and recorded for administrative and | 220-|security reasons. Anyone accessing this system expressly consents to | 220-|such monitoring and is advised that if such monitoring reveals | 220-|possible evidence of criminal activity, Road Runner may provide the | 220-|evidence of such activity to law enforcement officials. | 220----------------------------------------------------------------------- 220- 220- 220 rrweb2 FTP server (Version wu-2.6.1(2) Mon Apr 16 17:31:13 EDT 2001) ready. User (rrweb2.tampabay.rr.com:(none)): 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. 230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply. ftp> ftp> Local directory now C:. ftp> lcd C: get ftp.50m.sav 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for ftp.50m.sav (52428800 bytes). 226 Transfer complete. ftp: 52428800 bytes received in 49.49Seconds 1059.36Kbytes/sec. ftp> quit 221-You have transferred 52428800 bytes in 1 files. 221-Total traffic for this session was 52430325 bytes in 1 transfers. 221-Thank you for using the FTP service on rrweb2. 221 Goodbye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 1059.36 Kbytes/set * 8.192 = 8678.3 Kbps Not bad. Try FIOS DHCP 15000/2000 cablenut setting from Version 8 and see if that works any better for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Actually made it a little slower. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6962 Kbps about 7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 850 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 14:15:08 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 124X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.2 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 62.21 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P0I3192KJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 I was afraid of that. Well, go with the Cable & DSL 10000 file. Your trace shows really good route, so signal's good. I imagine that if you are able to eliminate many of your running processes and connections, then your bandwidth will stop bleeding. BTW, i noticed the networking IP from netstat. If you do a direct connection, then you will see higher speeds. Routers process data, which takes (a generally small amount of) time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalRapture Posted February 25, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 25, 2006 Thanks for all your help, Fallow. When I got home last night, I noticed my computer had an error. Then, it shutdown, and since then, I cannot log in to windows. The error kept saying: "Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM", and nothing would happen. I even messed with BOIS settings, and asked a question at www.experts-exchange.com, still awaiting an answer. So I went out today and bought a new Gateway X2 4200+. Now I just gotta get this one 'up to speed'. Edit: Problem solved. The previous tests on this thread were done directly to a cable modem. When I had the wireless network adapter connected, I was only getting 6Mbps. After checking the speeds on my new computer, (connected through the network adapter) I was getting only 3Mbps, but with the Vanburen's cablenut v8,Cable & DSL 10000 file, I'm getting 10Mbps. What a big difference this program, vanburen's settings, and a new computer make! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9854 Kbps about 9.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1203 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Fri Feb 24 2006 21:35:10 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 176X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.85 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 129.38 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZSAXTKCEL And that's with my girlfriend connected to xbox live! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted February 25, 2006 CID Share Posted February 25, 2006 Thanks for all your help, Fallow. When I got home last night, I noticed my computer had an error. Then, it shutdown, and since then, I cannot log in to windows. The error kept saying: "Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM", and nothing would happen. I even messed with BOIS settings, and asked a question at www.experts-exchange.com, still awaiting an answer. So I went out today and bought a new Gateway X2 4200+. Now I just gotta get this one 'up to speed'. Edit: Problem solved. The previous tests on this thread were done directly to a cable modem. When I had the wireless network adapter connected, I was only getting 6Mbps. After checking the speeds on my new computer, (connected through the network adapter) I was getting only 3Mbps, but with the Vanburen's cablenut v8,Cable & DSL 10000 file, I'm getting 10Mbps. What a big difference this program, vanburen's settings, and a new computer make! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9854 Kbps about 9.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1203 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Fri Feb 24 2006 21:35:10 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 176X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.85 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 129.38 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZSAXTKCEL And that's with my girlfriend connected to xbox live! Nice! Glad your getting the advertised speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.