Jump to content

fios speed problem after tweak


Recommended Posts

i just applied the cablenut tweak with the van buren css: Verizon_Fios_PPPoE_15000_2000  and now my speed is horrible.  i tried to restore the registry, and im still getting crappy speeds:

Your connection is: 9420 Kbps or 9.4 Mbps

You Downloaded at: 1150 kB/s

You are running: 168 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 0.89 second(s)

Member Ident: Username:etiolate CompID:6525866394

Test Time:: 2006/03/10 - 1:37pm

Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Test ID: FGPWQ7VSJ (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)

anyone give me a hand? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, this is getting worse.  I just deleted cablenut tweaks, and rebooted.

TCP properties for IP = 71.245.183.156 ()

Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405ac01010402

MTU = 1492

MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.

MSS = 1452

MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.

Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits

Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 17424

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

63888 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 696.96 Kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your TCP Window limits you to: 278.784 Kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 123 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 2605 Kbps about 2.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 318 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 8:56am

Bottom Line:: 47X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.22 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.407 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 51.96 % of your hosts average (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5KO3491RC

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1193 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 146 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:17am

Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 7.01 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.27488 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.21 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P5HXYVCD7

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, this is getting worse.  I just deleted cablenut tweaks, and rebooted.

TCP properties for IP = 71.245.183.156 ()

Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405ac01010402

MTU = 1492

MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.

MSS = 1452

MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.

Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits

Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 17424

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

63888 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 696.96 Kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your TCP Window limits you to: 278.784 Kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 123 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 2605 Kbps about 2.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 318 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 8:56am

Bottom Line:: 47X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.22 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.407 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 51.96 % of your hosts average (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5KO3491RC

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1193 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 146 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:17am

Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 7.01 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.27488 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.21 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P5HXYVCD7

yea, windows XP default RWIN when you run your NIC at 10Mbps is very low

try these settings

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

im running windows 2000 pro.    are you saying i should have my nic set to 100bastx full duplex?  heres what i got after i applied that css:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 9712 Kbps about 9.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1186 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:57am

Bottom Line:: 173X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.86 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.047 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 93.77 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5RSQL1YDW

Link to post
Share on other sites

im running windows 2000 pro.    are you saying i should have my nic set to 100bastx full duplex?

i suggest you leave it in "auto"

I have seen some people with w2k having speed problems with AFD tweaking

If the speed is still not good with the file i posted above, try this file

this file is not based upon AFD tweaking.

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i noticed my cpu was up around 80% - 100% while running those tests.  what the hell is up with that.  firefox hogs it all up

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 14655 Kbps about 14.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1789 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:19am

Bottom Line:: 262X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.57 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.797 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 192.4 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D2QMEYZJ

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1221 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 149 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:20am

Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 6.87 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.03488 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.44 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PHX9DCMBK

Link to post
Share on other sites

i noticed my cpu was up around 80% - 100% while running those tests.  what the hell is up with that.  firefox hogs it all up

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 14655 Kbps about 14.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1789 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:19am

Bottom Line:: 262X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.57 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.797 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 192.4 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D2QMEYZJ

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1221 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 149 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:20am

Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 6.87 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.03488 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.44 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PHX9DCMBK

try this http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=12160&st=st&ta=&top=&nobar=1

see if that using less CPU

its a test without progressbar.

you can try lower the TcpWindowsize and GlobalMaxTcpwindowsize to 255552

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Etiolate, what are the specs of your computer?

I know when I had Comcast internet on my Dell dimension 2300, (Intel celery 1.8 Ghz, 64mb on board video, 512 MB ram, 40GB HD), my speeds were very very slow (maybe 500 Kb/s range), upgraded to my custom AMD system (AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1GB ram, 160 GB HD, 40GB HD, ATI radeon 9550) $600 later, my speeds jumped to over 1Mb/s avg. from any decent server with the same connection. And yes that was in Firefox

With most of today's basic computers even, I don't see why the CPU would be getting used up that much unless there are some adware/spyware type problems involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...