p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted August 12, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 i've heard my good things about this board and how it helped many Net-izens improve their conenction speed.. maybe you could help me with my dilemma when it comes to my connection .. OS: WinXP Home Edition SP2 ISP: myDestiny Cable Internet (Philippines) Firewall: Sygate Personal Firewall v5.5 AntiVirus: NOD32 here's my bandwidth test result: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 319 Kbps about 0.32 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 39 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 9:56am Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 26.26 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 76.797 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 45.57 % of your hosts average (mydestiny.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-W4BCU0PS8 User Agent:: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) [!] the advertised speed of my ISP ranges from 256-512kbps, uncapped, which means i can reach 1mbps or higher .. but the thing is, i have to use a download manager to achieve that speed .. when i use the "Save Target As ..." option of Opera, the speed would range between 15kB/s-30kB/s .. on SpeedGuide.Net's TCP/IP Analyzer, here's the result: TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65535 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65535 Note: TCP 1323 Options need to be enabled for RWIN over 2^16 (65535). Windows 9x might also need the MS Vtcp386 fix. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2621.4 kbps (327.675 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1048.56 kbps (131.07 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 118 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) .. what configurations or settings should i use? btw, i've also called my ISP's hotline and they said that there's no problem with my connection .. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dlewis23 3 Posted August 12, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 p0rnrh3tt welcome to the forum what is your advertised speed? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VanBuren 111 Posted August 12, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 the advertised speed of my ISP ranges from 256-512Kbps, uncapped, which means i can reach 1Mbps or higher .. but the thing is, i have to use a download manager to achieve that speed .. when i use the "Save Target As ..." option of Opera, the speed would range between 15kB/s-30kB/s .. hey and welcome to the forum p0rnrh3tt speedmeters in browsers is usually not very accurate. You can test this by open taskmanager network graph, and see if it picks up the speed. The reason is that when clicking "save as" browser starts downloading a part of the file before you even clicked "ok". That make speedmeter to jump since it calculate how much you downloaded and split it in time. To use this type of measurement, you need a large file eg 30 MB and download it completely. your RWIN is very large for that type of bandwidth, i suggest you try cablenut and use VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_9CABLE_DSL_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMTU 1500 Cable & DSL 512.ccs or Cable & DSL 1500.ccs VanBuren Quote Link to post Share on other sites
p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted August 13, 2006 Author CID Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 thanks .. i'll try that .. i'll post an update on what happens .. if you don't mind me asking, what does RWIN mean? what does it do ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted August 13, 2006 Author CID Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 473 Kbps about 0.47 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 58 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 8:42pm Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 17.66 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 10.031 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 65.69 % of your hosts average (mydestiny.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KPL4IC7AS User Agent:: Opera/9.01 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) [!] ..there's an improvement .. btw, are there other things that i need to optimize so i could reach 1mpbs speed? or that'll depend on my ISP? the download manager that i'm using is "Internet Download Manager" .. the download speed reaches 100+ to 200+kB/s .. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted August 13, 2006 Author CID Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 my speed is really inconsistent .. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 202 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 25 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/13 - 2:29am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 40.96 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 15.64 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 27.37 % of your hosts average (mydestiny.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-L0CTJ1NIP User Agent:: Opera/9.01 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) [!] TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 32120 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 32120 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 1284.8 kbps (160.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 513.92 kbps (64.24 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VanBuren 111 Posted August 13, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 my speed is really inconsistent .. use this file, small files can give inconsistent results http://www.testmy.net/dl-2992 VanBuren Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gotmilk 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 I don't know if this will help or not, but if you're using Opera, try testing with either Firefox or Internet Explorer. I know when I used Opera for testing it would give me really low speeds, then when I switched back to Firefox and IE, my speeds were fine again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blunted 2 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 my opera gives me pretty good speeds but less than IE and firefox. good eyes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dark06 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 also can we plz clear up something KB/s or Kb/s when dl from opera again try ff Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FiberOptic 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 p0rnrh3tt Welcome to the forum, well try use this file, small files can give inconsistent results http://www.testmy.net/dl-2992 VanBuren As VanBuren says try a bigger file because when you use a small one all the connection does is starts and seconds later it stops it dosent have enought time to reach its peak/maximum speed using a large file will max it out and hopefully give you an accurate test. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dlewis23 3 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 p0rnrh3tt use a bigger test file as van suggested, use IE to test as well if you can. if your advertised is between 256-512Kbps you are getting that. so your internet is fine. The reason you can get more when you use a download manager, is becuase it opens up more connections to the webserver. But most of the time those speeds you see there are fake, there not hte actually speed you are getting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dwt1966 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 I use www.speakeasy.net it seems to be good.I have cable.adelphia or whoever they are now.also I bought system mec. 6 pro and it is a great program Quote Link to post Share on other sites
p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted August 14, 2006 Author CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 i went to the site and used IE .. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 170 Kbps about 0.17 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 21 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/14 - 8:09am Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 48.76 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 143.828 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 20.91 % of your hosts average (mydestiny.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5QW6GF4YX User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] is this speed ok? but having an uncapped speed, does that mean my speed would be inconsistent and that explains i i sometimes get an mpbs connection? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
daman4469 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 The fact of the matter is....if your advertised range is where you say it is, even if it is uncapped, it is unlikely you will ever come close to reaching your highest advertised speed, being that you are using a cable connection. Your bandwidth is shared with all of your neighbors, and if your neighbor is Pirus the music Pirate, you are screwed. Look in your network neighborhood...you will see all of your neighbors in there. I recommend using Internet Explorer to test your download speeds, but not simply using its download utility. I have very accurate testing from www.speakeasy.net/speedtest. Resetting or changing your TCP/IP recieve window will do very little for a slower broadband connection. If you want to play around a little, remove any firewalls - software or hardware - and see if that helps. My connection is about 100kbps (12.2kBps) slower with a firewall up due to overhead...but it is worth it to me. Also, I know that at least 75 % of the time, when I have a client complaining about slow internet speeds over a broadband connection....it is a simple computer problem. Clear your cache, cookies, history, disk cleanup, and defragment your hard drive. Uninstall any programs you don't use(it is easy for them to build up). Only have critical processes run at startup. Remember, your internet connection is only as fast as your computer...a computer overwhelmed with processes will surely show "slow" internet speeds. I say try that before messing with any TCP/IP recieve window settings, etc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tommie gorman 130 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 Very good points daman4469. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theelviscerator 0 Posted August 14, 2006 CID Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 The fact of the matter is....if your advertised range is where you say it is, even if it is uncapped, it is unlikely you will ever come close to reaching your highest advertised speed, being that you are using a cable connection. Your bandwidth is shared with all of your neighbors, and if your neighbor is Pirus the music Pirate, you are screwed. Look in your network neighborhood...you will see all of your neighbors in there. I recommend using Internet Explorer to test your download speeds, but not simply using its download utility. I have very accurate testing from www.speakeasy.net/speedtest. Resetting or changing your TCP/IP recieve window will do very little for a slower broadband connection. If you want to play around a little, remove any firewalls - software or hardware - and see if that helps. My connection is about 100Kbps (12.2Kbps) slower with a firewall up due to overhead...but it is worth it to me. Also, I know that at least 75 % of the time, when I have a client complaining about slow internet speeds over a broadband connection....it is a simple computer problem. Clear your cache, cookies, history, disk cleanup, and defragment your hard drive. Uninstall any programs you don't use(it is easy for them to build up). Only have critical processes run at startup. Remember, your internet connection is only as fast as your computer...a computer overwhelmed with processes will surely show "slow" internet speeds. I say try that before messing with any TCP/IP recieve window settings, etc. very true why comcast always assumes its on your end..LOL>. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
p0rnrh3tt 0 Posted December 12, 2006 Author CID Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 your RWIN is very large for that type of bandwidth, i suggest you try cablenut and use VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_9CABLE_DSL_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMTU 1500Cable & DSL 512.ccs or Cable & DSL 1500.ccs hi! it's me again .. my download speed has been increased .. the max download speed that i can get is 305kB/s .. my question is since i formatted my PC, will i use the same setting as mentioned above? my only problem now is my upload speed .. will there be an improvement if i apply the settings mentioned above? === :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1448 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 177 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/11 - 4:57pm Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.79 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.922 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 17.92 % faster than the average for host (247.220) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YX9T0JCBF User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] === === :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 169 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 21 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/11 - 5:02pm Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 48.76 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 145.047 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (247.220) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AT1SEX23V User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] === === Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sparticus 5 Posted December 12, 2006 CID Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 hi! it's me again .. my download speed has been increased .. the max download speed that i can get is 305kB/s .. my question is since i formatted my PC, will i use the same setting as mentioned above? my only problem now is my upload speed .. will there be an improvement if i apply the settings mentioned above? === ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1448 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 177 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/11 - 4:57pm Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.79 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.922 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 17.92 % faster than the average for host (247.220) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YX9T0JCBF User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 === === ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 169 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 21 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/11 - 5:02pm Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 48.76 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 145.047 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (247.220) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AT1SEX23V User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 === === Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jenie.chen 0 Posted August 22, 2007 CID Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 i know some guys who reinstalls OS every 2-3 mos just to maintain decent connection.. ::::::::::::::::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::::::::::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1312 Kbps about 1.31 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 160 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 556 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 68 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/22 - 3:39am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NA008PDV3 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XQ5ONPEYL User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.6 (Ubuntu-feisty) During the first two months.. DL speed was around 240Kbps... :/ I just wanna cry. agh. I'm so jealous guys.. Destiny users who are getting around 250s... That's the subscribe speed right? for 999 plan? I emailed myDestiny, and they insisted on using their own SPeedtest.. But it's giving connection rather than speed. so misleading.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.