Jump to content

My speed today!!!


oleol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 418
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Confirmation Needed.

So its cool to restart my DW7000 like every 24hrs :?::?: :?:

I distinctly remember reading somewhere that i shouldn't do that. Let me look up that link.

:shock: :shock:

All I will say is I have been doing it since new. And no problems after 19 months of service. Haven't you noticed everytime you call tech support that is one of the first things they have you do? So I asked that very same question over a year ago, and they said  :thumbsup:

I shut my comp and modem down everynight.  :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I will say is I have been doing it since new. And no problems after 19 months of service. Haven't you noticed everytime you call tech support that is one of the first things they have you do? So I asked that very same question over a year ago, and they said  :thumbsup:

I shut my comp and modem down everynight.  :wink:

tommie, the 6000's are no longer getting any upgrades in software and NOC maintenance so your very safe in doing that. DW7000's may be at that point too, I've not checked on that in a few months but the HN7000S is ongoing and it is best not to shut downunless your away from home (trip) i would for home safety, a reboot, OK  :thumbsup:.I'm not a Hughes tech  [geek]  but just an accumulation of what I have read.  :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its started looking alright already...LMAO :!: :!: :!:

9 outta 14 machines on a proxy...and they dont know it yet :evil6: :evil6: :evil6:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1723 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 210 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/02/20 - 10:06am

Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.88 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 28.453 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 2.87 % faster than the average for host (111.99)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-51UB4XQV3

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem to have a problem here. More information :?: is needed about your HN7000S system, longitude, receive frequency, ACP and Signal Strength.

Longitude: 117 West

Receive Frequency: 1070 MHz

Signal Strength: 77

I don't know about ACP, but my signal strength when I had my 6000 was 94.  The dish was not touched, but I only installed the 7000s modem and the signal dropped to 77.  Even the customer service person was wowed by the signal strength of 94.  He could not explain the drop after the 7000s was installed.  He said it must be the weather.

I also constantly get "web acceleration status error", and the system in DEGRADED.  It happened twice while I typed this message.

Any direction would be appreciated.

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longitude: 117 West

Receive Frequency: 1070 MHz

Signal Strength: 77

I don't know about ACP, but my signal strength when I had my 6000 was 94.  The dish was not touched, but I only installed the 7000s modem and the signal dropped to 77.  Even the customer service person was wowed by the signal strength of 94.  He could not explain the drop after the 7000s was installed.  He said it must be the weather.

I also constantly get "web acceleration status error", and the system in DEGRADED.  It happened twice while I typed this message.

Any direction would be appreciated.

thanks

ACP can be found here http://192.168.0.1/fs/advanced/advanced.html . By changing the modem made a change in your system. Was there a transponder change? I would say that high with the 6000 meant it was right on the money, next to perfect. I jumped a few points going from a 4000 to a DW7000 but got to 83 RSL X 83 ACP with some dish tweaking. Took me over an hour to do so. You can have a good signal but a poor ACP which would cause some problems. Let's continue, check that link, there are many things to learn here.

I forgot to ask, did you get a new power supply? That can cause problems that can't be explained, using an old supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thx... :grin2:

im using SafeSquid Proxy on a Linux Box for the clients.

Still Not Satisfied Though...

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted::evil: intentions

I want steady streaming on a few of them so I'm thinking i use bandwidth limits on most of the proxy clients coz whenever they browse while streaming is on it starts buffering.  I HATE :angry: THAT!!  :angry:

I'm new to SafeSquid, might start a Q&A thread and see if there are any users here. I have lots of questions :?::?: :?::?: :?:[nerdly] [nerdly] [nerdly]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got this today,

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1691 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 206 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/02/21 - 12:04pm

Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.97 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 28.985 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 1.02 % faster than the average for host (111.99)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DL15YNB2J

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1776 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 217 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/02/21 - 10:57pm

Bottom Line:: 31X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.72 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.797 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 69.63 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0V63RUKP7

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

Wow, we're moving tonight!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ACP can be found here http://192.168.0.1/fs/advanced/advanced.html . By changing the modem made a change in your system. Was there a transponder change? I would say that high with the 6000 meant it was right on the money, next to perfect. I jumped a few points going from a 4000 to a DW7000 but got to 83 RSL X 83 ACP with some dish tweaking. Took me over an hour to do so. You can have a good signal but a poor ACP which would cause some problems. Let's continue, check that link, there are many things to learn here.

I forgot to ask, did you get a new power supply? That can cause problems that can't be explained, using an old supply.

granpa

Sorry for the delay in getting back.  Long hours at work......... anyway

I did not receive a new power supply with the new 7000s modem.

Ok, I found the link above... what am I looking for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirmation Needed.

So its cool to restart my DW7000 like every 24hrs :?::?: :?:

I distinctly remember reading somewhere that i shouldn't do that. Let me look up that link.

:shock: :shock:

Do you want to save power?

If you need to, then go ahead, if you don't then I don't see the probably with keeping it on. Computers don't need to be restarted and neither does your modem unless you're having major problems. Lots of times, my modem just restarts itself after about a week. Of course a good long power cycle is good for it, but you really don't need to do it daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Upload Connection is:: 203 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 25 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/03/18 - 6:45am

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 40.96 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 60.507 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 91.51 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1LBRPSN5J

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1266 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 155 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/03/18 - 6:46am

Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.61 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 19.358 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 20.34 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6WMPKIV5D

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!]

:grin2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still flying..... was slow yesterday though.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 2094 Kbps about 2.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 256 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/03/19 - 2:21am

Bottom Line:: 37X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 11.703 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 98.86 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B3U8MR6QN

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

:angry:Well for some reason I upgraded from the DW6000 to the HN7000S how ever I wouldn't exactly use the word upgrade!!!! :tickedoff:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 286 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 35 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/03 - 1:41pm

Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 29.26 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 85.703 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 27.03 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HTEIU9XY6

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that captfr. Kinda why I finally switched to EVDO. Much better all day. And storms are no bother anymore.  :grin2: So you are up for the next 15 months then?

i just upgraded to i figured i would atleast give it a try do u have sprint these are my speeds just got this today no tweaks at all strait out of the box still on my old hughesnet settings...

BEST PART IS UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS

:::::::::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 1114 Kbps about 1.11 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)

Download Speed is:: 136 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 322 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 39 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/04 - 3:59pm

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PE4V23I6K

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WEZG9KT7X

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speakeasy

Last Result:

Download Speed: 769 kbps (96.1 KB/sec transfer rate)

Upload Speed: 320 kbps (40 KB/sec transfer rate)

Last Result:

Download Speed: 815 kbps (101.9 KB/sec transfer rate)

Upload Speed: 245 kbps (30.6 KB/sec transfer rate)

About the same at speedtest.net.

Yeah it is Sprint. A bit weird yet. Little slowdown uring busy time of day anymore. Can't wait till they release the Revision B, it is supposed to be up to 4.6. And  I could maybe use an antenna. If I ever find the time. It is supposed to help some with the speeds.

So how is yours tested with 2992 file test kol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speakeasy

Last Result:

Download Speed: 769 Kbps (96.1 kB/sec transfer rate)

Upload Speed: 320 Kbps (40 kB/sec transfer rate)

Last Result:

Download Speed: 815 Kbps (101.9 kB/sec transfer rate)

Upload Speed: 245 Kbps (30.6 kB/sec transfer rate)

About the same at speedtest.net.

Yeah it is Sprint. A bit weird yet. Little slowdown uring busy time of day anymore. Can't wait till they release the Revision B, it is supposed to be up to 4.6. And  I could maybe use an antenna. If I ever find the time. It is supposed to help some with the speeds.

So how is yours tested with 2992 file test kol?

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 1277 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Download Speed is:: 156 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 4:30am

Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.56 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 9.594 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 5.8 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VKTUO9ZNE

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 1209 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 148 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 4:32am

Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.92 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.265 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 0.17 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PSTY35M7G

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 1177 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 144 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 4:31am

Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.11 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.828 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 97.51 % of your hosts average (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OBDRI1LVM

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Upload Connection is:: 487 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 59 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 4:35am

Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 17.36 sec

Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 17.062 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 183.14 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0PQ1HAKFR

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)

122106233.png

what card do you have ? i have the novatel  u720

removed url

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. U720

Is that what the speed tests were done with?

The tests here drive mine crazy. It goes past 10 megs. every time.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 17089 Kbps about 17.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2086 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:22am

Bottom Line:: 298X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.49 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 5.829 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1314.65 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KPYSCXM09

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 15511 Kbps about 15.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1893 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:22am

Bottom Line:: 270X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.54 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.422 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1182.96 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QSWE00P4J

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 15325 Kbps about 15.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1871 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:23am

Bottom Line:: 267X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.55 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.5 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1166.53 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HUWABPL40

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

And yes I cleared the cache, defragged, debugged, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. U720

Is that what the speed tests were done with?

The tests here drive mine crazy. It goes past 10 megs. every time.

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 17089 Kbps about 17.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2086 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:22am

Bottom Line:: 298X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.49 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 5.829 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1314.65 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KPYSCXM09

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 15511 Kbps about 15.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1893 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:22am

Bottom Line:: 270X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.54 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.422 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1182.96 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QSWE00P4J

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)

::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 15325 Kbps about 15.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1871 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2007/05/05 - 5:23am

Bottom Line:: 267X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.55 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.5 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1166.53 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HUWABPL40

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)

And yes I cleared the cache, defragged, debugged, etc...

yes thats what i used is urs connected to a router ? if-so which one ? surfing is alot better than hughesnet right ??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...