Jump to content

HN7000S Slow Speeds


BillyH80

Recommended Posts

Have you tried tweaking it yet datatechnician?

I  haven't done any tweaks on this machine. It is running SuSe Linux 10.0  .(The one I use the Most) I do use two other computers that run 2000pro. however speed results using either the Linux machine or any of the windows 2000 computers yield the same results.

The Windows Computers all have Prolands Protector Plus Antivirus program and Adaware. All have been scanned (yesterday) and all is clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Try reading here. I suggest the TCP Optimizer as it is much easier to navigate ( it was my choice ). And the Optimizer works well for satelite. But if you feel up to it most on this forum use cablenut.

http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-1013

:D

Wow just woke up, and I just realized I posted the same as earlier.  :coffee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to share with the group what HughesNet techs are telling me are acceptable speeds.  I've gone through my computer with a fine tooth comb.  No problems here.  Speeds in the early AM run in the very high 900s.  Twelve hours later the connection is about useless. These speeds are the similar on any of my three computers.  Speed tests are done with only one computer online. Suggestions or information would be appreciated.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 91 Kbps about 0.09 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 11 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/09/05 - 7:03pm

Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 93.09 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 270.437 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 8.76 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2YANQXTCP

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Opera 8.50 [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum demetri  :wave:

Just click on the "Largest - 2992 kB" on this page and if you know how copy and paste your scores here after you are done.

http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php

Clean out your temp files before testing. Top of your browser where it says tools*Internet Options*Delete Files including Offline Content*OK*OK*test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried tweaking it yet datatechnician?

I've tried some Linux tweaks on this machine (SuSe Linux) awhile back and I really didn't notice anything different.

I again contacted Hughes support and engineering is supposed to call me back. I've already had one call back from engineering.

If they call again I am asking for a transponder change as it is evident G-11 1370 has some serious issues. I have spoken with others on G-11 1370 and there speeds are dismal like mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

allright guys here are my results for the speed test.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1622 Kbps about 1.62 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 198 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/09/06 - 11:26pm

Bottom Line:: 28X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.17 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 15.11 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 56.26 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-G4MAFBCHU

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommy, Here they are

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1487 Kbps about 1.49 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 182 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/09/08 - 12:05am

Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.63 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.484 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 43.39 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-92G5UWK61

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1079 Kbps about 1.08 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 132 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/09/08 - 12:06am

Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.76 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 22.704 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 4.05 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AOM8PJEKF

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have the 6000. Would it be faster with the 7000. Received an E-Mail from Hughes.net that the upgrade is $49.95 but I don't know if it is worth the change.  I am new to the forum and would appreciate any information regarding the 7000

I tested my download speed at www.testmy.net. I got 1394 Kbps or 170 kB/s (I tested with a 2992 kB file). If you don't believe me you can go to testmy.net and validate the score. https://testmy.net/5CDGSYOP2 ! This email was sent to you by your friend The Keeper, from a web based form on testmy.net. Go to testmy.net and see if your download speed can come close to 1394 Kbps. Hey, you may even be faster than The Keeper... then it will be your turn to brag ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The keeper this is what I got on your validation "404 - File not found!"

Next time just post the score. Like this speedburst.

Connection is:: 5246 Kbps about 5.25 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Reply #216

http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=7194.210

And since you are on the 6000 post over there click and paste, with your speeds since this is the 7000 section.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...