Jump to content

DW 4000 capped?


816_1443013898

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 899 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 110 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2)

Test Time:: 2006/09/29 - 7:04pm

Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 9.31 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 27.266 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 86.19 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1YU9VG2JI

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; DigExt; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe real weird. So maybe you only appear to be capped on TMN's test??

Too wierd. Although my speeds are always faster on here.

You just went way over my head. I wonder if ghostmaster has any idea's, besides it was bound to happen. Which evidently is not the issue here.

Just have a feeling it is just on here, no?

Has it appeared anywhere else besides here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a minute. The 4000 is no longer supported, right. So it might not validate for the test.

Any way, here is the link.

http://customercare.myhughesnet.com/

Under Resources "Sat. Speed Test."

Link directly into the test area.

http://satspeedtest.hughesnet.com/cgi/launch2.cgi

Just enter your site id and submit.

It did not give me a receipt yet, I will get it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for you Jkandra I'm always looking for a way out of this fiasco. Im in a remote area relating to DSL or Cable, however there is 1 P2P wireless signal

overhead and when they came out to do a site survey I was told that I would need to erect a 100 ft tower to access the signal as I'm in a hollow aside a Lake. Well thats just not going to happen.

My Var http://www.galaxybroadband.ca/ is setting up wireless around the province and is an ongoing procedure. It's just a matter of time before the whole country will be a hotspot IMHO. I'm in constant contact with these people as I can bring them close to 150 new customers who can only recieve dialup or go the costly way as I did years ago with DirecWay. Here is the latest E-mail they sent me reguarding the status of wireless in the area.

Trying to get you this service in Rockwood/Fergus, but having problems with the town of Rockwod for tower permits.

Until then, two way wireless satellite is the answer.

regards,

**** ****

______________________________________________________________________________

I'm soon moving to the city as I do every winter (for 5 months) were I get Cable 6meg/880Up but come back here every weekend it's just that nice.

So...........Through perseverance the Snail made it to the Arc.Some Day.!!!!/ until then i'm stuck with Terestrial. :roll:

It's just a matter of time---

Check this out tommie gorman and

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's starting to look like they are choking out the 4000s....

If they wanted to get rid of them so bad, they should have discontinued commissioning them, and offered a free upgrade to the DW7000 for all 4000 customers, instead of choking out their bandwidth..

Then again, maybe it's just paranoia and the speeds will start to come back up.  Maybe they are working on your transponder to get it ready for HN7000s.  Who knows...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't think the 7000 is an upgrade. FOr the same D/L speeds. You say they are only getting 500 D/L on the 7000, why would I even consider anything in buying their equipment. The U/L is still not that great. If I couldget 1000 on a 4000 and not have to buy any equipment, I would see no reason to buy into it all. Still faster than a 7000 D/L.

Just not what a person is used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technology wise, the 7000 is definately an upgrade.  It's self hosted, produces 200k+ uploads with a standard transmitter, and gets better/more stable ping times.  That translates into faster secure sites and browsing. 

The only downside to the 7000 at all, is the fact that downloads are restricted to what you PAY for.  (or less during extreme peak hours)  (Notice I said they should have offered a FREE upgrade, if they wanted to oust the 4000 so bad)

I never said they were only getting 500kbps on the 7000.  I did say they were starting to run like that on the 6000s though, for some people.  Now that im on a better transponder, I usually run this except for during heavy peak hours:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1186 Kbps about 1.19 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 145 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2)

Test Time:: 2006/09/30 - 2:42pm

Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.06 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.672 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 13.49 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X6WSPVF4E

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1) [!]

I'm still jealous of all the 4000 users who were getting 2500kbps and paying the same thing as me though.....grrrrr....grrrr....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last post of anykind in 4000 board."July 18, 2006" They have pretty much died off in the 4000 board. The 6000 is not far behind. A few of us keep posting once in a while. Mostly me I guess. Is there  somewhere they are still posting those speeds? Just curious.

Free would have worked out well, if not for another 15 month contract. Or is that the same thing. If so, I would trade them maybe now that they have the bugs worked out.

Never cared that much about U/L much. And remember the 6000 is self hosted also. Still not sure why they would want to drop our 6000's any in speeds. I am a rare execption you said. So I would not affect them much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can track 6000 speeds on the "current status" threads at http://www.dslreports.com/forum/sat.  As well as 4000 and 3000 speeds.  Not everyone is being capped.  Some on the 4000 are still seeing "normal" speeds.

Not everyone on the 6000 is capped either.  (im just speculating they will)  Ive just noticed certain threads where people on 6000s are saying their speeds are running at 500kbps.  And some even saying it's always been that way.

If uploads don't concern you, then there is no real reason for you to upgrade to 7000.  I wouldn't do anything until the next gen (spaceway 3) comes out anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I got desperate..I uninstalled direcway...cleared the Registry....reloaded 4.2.1.10  and then reloaded tweaks... here is the result.

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 1134 Kbps about 1.13 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 138 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 65 Kbps about 0.07 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 8 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/09/30 - 5:33pm

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-L4A8OX2Q3

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K3U8XTC5Z

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; DigExt; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

not a bad upload speed.

:)  no different..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...