Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
php

Cable modem

Recommended Posts

I've tried a D-link. It was ok, but then I got VoIP from cox and I have to use the default modem. :(  I really like the linksys cable modem gateway it looks real nice. Anyone tried it?

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1138056788757&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, wow... after almost a month of attempted installations, we finally have internet... sortof...

hopefully the service is better than their communication... yikes

seems alright so far though... 3/256

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 2993 Kbps about 2.99 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 365 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 242 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 30 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/11/28 - 8:08pm

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-U4O213VBG

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LGY3T05RM

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 2921 Kbps about 2.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 357 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/11/28 - 8:11pm

Bottom Line:: 51X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.87 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 16.781 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 75.28 % of your hosts average (charter.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CH5DYEG3P

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:

    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 48ms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently using a Motorola SB4100 and I am experiencing real good speeds, however, when I go to purchase a new one, it will be the Motorola SB5120.

I have a couple of friends with the SB5120 and they get really good speeds and speed bursts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...