Beathemdown Posted November 8, 2006 CID Share Posted November 8, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted November 8, 2006 CID Share Posted November 8, 2006 Beathemdown, Welcome to the forum. What are your advertized speeds and who are you with. Nice speeds by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 8, 2006 CID Share Posted November 8, 2006 Welcome to the forum Beathemdown So would that be a 6 meg Roadrunner package? If so not bad then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beathemdown Posted November 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted November 8, 2006 Welcome to the forum Beathemdown So would that be a 6 meg Roadrunner package? If so not bad then. yup you're right on the money yes its road runner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 8, 2006 CID Share Posted November 8, 2006 Beathemdown, Welcome to TMN! Great speeds! Especially for what you are supposed to be getting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 25, 2006 CID Share Posted November 25, 2006 When you're ready....step into the realm of Cox..... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 16017 Kbps about 16 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1955 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/25 - 9:52am Bottom Line:: 279X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.52 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.219 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 198.6 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VYD4KZOPX User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 25, 2006 CID Share Posted November 25, 2006 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1625 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 198 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/25 - 10:00am Bottom Line:: 28X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 5.17 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 15.078 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 142.9 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VPAJ5BUKW User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 25, 2006 CID Share Posted November 25, 2006 When you're ready....step into the realm of Cox..... ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 16017 Kbps about 16 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1955 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/25 - 9:52am Bottom Line:: 279X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.52 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.219 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 198.6 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VYD4KZOPX User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) Some people have and don't like it. Cox is horrible in some areas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 26, 2006 CID Share Posted November 26, 2006 Nice speeds Sammy_C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 26, 2006 CID Share Posted November 26, 2006 Thanks Tommie...I feel bad for you and your satellite issues..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 26, 2006 CID Share Posted November 26, 2006 Nice speeds Sammy_C One day you WILL get dsl! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Thanks Tommie...I feel bad for you and your satellite issues..... Are you kidding, if I went DSL I would not have near as much to post. No one to gripe about any more. Nah, it is truly better than dial-up. The most agravating part is paying so much just to have this speed. Otherwise it is not bad for surfing. Now gaming would be out. But I think my gaming years are gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 You're probably right about that....I think living a mile from an airport probably helps me out tremendously. Some people have and don't like it. Cox is horrible in some areas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 What's up with this "TimPawlak4" mirror? I have a speedy connection...but there's no way it's THAT speedy! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 56108 Kbps about 56.1 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 6849 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 10:41pm Bottom Line:: 978X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.15 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 3.062 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 945.04 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HUE6KNYAM User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Server 1 stats are more like it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 whoops... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 14489 Kbps about 14.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1769 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 10:50pm Bottom Line:: 253X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.58 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.875 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 169.81 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ML0OTCPJ5 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1720 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 210 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 10:58pm Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.88 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.25 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 157.1 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OKBYEH89U User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 1720 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 210 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 10:58pm Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.88 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.25 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 157.1 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OKBYEH89U User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) Ive never seen someone post more speed tests in my life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 In the beginning it happens. It soon goes away. Then on to better things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 1720 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 210 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 10:58pm Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.88 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.25 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 157.1 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OKBYEH89U User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) Keep tweaking I bet you can get it to 2 megs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Show me the way, great Sparticus....show me the way....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Show me the way, great Sparticus....show me the way....... If you are on cablenut, just keep playing around. Don't forget to see how lean you can strip it down to. Race cars run much better lightened up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Actually, I took your advice....I'm on TCP Optimizer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy_C Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Uploads seem to be doin ok ...I'd like to get a consistent 14Mb or better on the DL though :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1772 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 216 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/27 - 12:43am Bottom Line:: 31X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.74 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.828 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 164.87 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PONL5XEIC User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 You can still tweak it. Try up or down on the dial every few days. It will change some. Just don't rush it, it takes some time but it is worth it. And really quite simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.