Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
just-

Post your speed from Smart Bro (wi fi)

Recommended Posts

really? and i have always used firefox to take speed tests. well,here's what i got.

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 236 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

Download Speed is:: 29 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 5:10am

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 35.31 sec

Tested from a 579 kB file and took 20.093 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 96.72 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SUM9Y1RL8

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6

i'll post my IE one after dinner.

P.S. can't believe diagnosis says thats ok.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's my IE result. almost the same.

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 226 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

Download Speed is:: 28 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 5:35am

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 36.57 sec

Tested from a 579 kB file and took 20.953 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 53.68 % of your hosts average (241.45)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F1TVDMGUY

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

your right, firefox loads web pages faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, but that rssi is still low. best bet would be to adjust the direction of the canopy.

@scriva - is your canopy facing a building? looks like your installers didn'ttaketimeto give you a proper ap connection.

No, my canopy has a clear sight of the tower it's just a few blocks away from my house.

i dont know his exact location.

I live in cainta, rizal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wtf!!! I think the slow speed was my fault!!

See, this morning i downloaded some registry from jzlr...or something like that. Then I turned off the computer because i went out. Then, I came back and tested the speed and the slow speed was what I got.

Then I remembered that I made a system restore point before doing those then...

share2-3CHXNO8FG

woooohooo  :laugh:

at least I'm out of that crappy speed!! hahaha!! wooooo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm, just noticed, i made a mistake in my previous post. that's online, not offline. anyway,i have made the great leap. after struggling for 6 hours, i am now using xubuntu, and i think it's doing fine without cablenut and tcpoptimizer. i think i can crank some more speed out of it though.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 203 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

Download Speed is:: 25 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 7:33pm

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 40.96 sec

Tested from a 579 kB file and took 23.387 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 48.33 % of your hosts average (241.45)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GBKVLPU9J

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-feisty) [!]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe its with your base station.

i don't think so..

here's my AP

Current entry index: 1

*********************************************

Index: 1 Frequency: 5735.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f1-73-09

Jitter: 3 RSSI: 715 Power Level: -75 Beacon Count: 7 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0

Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 3822 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1

Session Count: 1 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0

FrameNumber: 591 SectorID: 1 Color Code: 115 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 17

Frequency: 5735 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3

*********************************************

Index: 2 Frequency: 5815.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f1-72-62

Jitter: 4 RSSI: 804 Power Level: -71 Beacon Count: 10 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0

Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1

Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0

FrameNumber: 149 SectorID: 6 Color Code: 120 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 14

Frequency: 5815 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3

*********************************************

Index: 3 Frequency: 5835.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f2-17-e7

Jitter: 9 RSSI: 533 Power Level: -79 Beacon Count: 7 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0

Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1

Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0

FrameNumber: 74 SectorID: 6 Color Code: 252 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 16

Frequency: 5835 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3

link capacity test

Stats for LUID: 21 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1522

Downlink RATE: 5148672 bps

Uplink RATE: 1259520 bps

Downlink Efficiency: 93 Percent

Max Downlink Index: 100

Actual Downlink Index: 93

Expected Frag Count: 20112

Actual Frag Count: 21526

Uplink Efficiency: 74 Percent

Max Uplink Index: 100

Actual Uplink Index: 74

Expected Frag Count: 4920

Actual Frag Count: 6625

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...