ArcticWolf Posted January 23, 2005 CID Share Posted January 23, 2005 I posted earlier that my service was 5100/768 ... I checked it over again and it's 5100/820 .... and I'm getting nowhere near 820 on upload. :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 557 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 68 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 10 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 15.06 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=DURP6ISX9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 you wont get more then that since you using Win 98 SE and not win XP /2k VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticWolf Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 You got to be kidding me , why is so different for mtu settings in Win98 and Win XP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticWolf Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Van Buren, is this test any good? I'm not so good at this stuff http://www.dslreports.com/speedresults/437b944765a4/1632271 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 the TCP stack is diffrent on 98 and XP you cant adjust DefaultSendWindow on win 98 thats the same as RWIN but on the sendside.... there is no solution for this, so upgrade to win XP the linequality test was ok but it was a problem at one level 3 node VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticWolf Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Thanks for your input Van, although I wish i knew what you meant by losing a node, but it seems it doesn't matter to much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Thanks for your input Van, although I wish i knew what you meant by losing a node, but it seems it doesn't matter to much no problem ill try to explain Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 so-4-0-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 0.98 3.31 75.78 1 so-1-2-0.bbr2.SanJose1.Level3.net note: on router loss report 34% 40 60 0.95 3.72 50.39 2 so-2-2-0.bbr1.Chicago1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 55.97 57.06 104.47 3 so-6-0-0.gar1.Chicago1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 55.97 56.47 68.57 4 4.79.72.34 0% 60 60 76.79 77.02 77.37 5 207.96.146.130 0% 60 60 76.09 79.83 220.92 6 10.154.0.210 0% 60 60 77.03 82.58 205.55 7 10.154.0.129 0% 60 60 76.92 77.33 77.88 8 24.200.241.118 0% 60 60 76.29 76.46 76.91 9 (YOUR ADDRESS) 2% 59 60 83.07 90.62 160.09 Fail: each Hop is a node, and you loosing packets at this node 1 so-1-2-0.bbr2.SanJose1.Level3.net note: on router loss report 34% 40 60 0.95 3.72 50.39 that means you need to retransmit packets to reach the destination 0 so-4-0-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 0.98 3.31 75.78 that takes time and slow you down alot. its also work the other way around, so the packets the destination sends to you needs to be retransmitted aswell VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticWolf Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Ahhhh I got it now, thanks for the info and what it means Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.