ghostmaster Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Waahoooo....hughes.net rocks... Pinging www.google.com [216.239.51.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=755ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=735ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=724ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=684ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 216.239.51.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 684ms, Maximum = 755ms, Average = 724ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starship_troopers Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryanonfios Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Waahoooo....hughes.net rocks... Pinging www.google.com [216.239.51.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=755ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=735ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=724ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=684ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 216.239.51.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 684ms, Maximum = 755ms, Average = 724ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starship_troopers Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 i'm not sure if my ping time is good or not, but the one i posted earlier was on my laptop, here is one from my desktop Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.167.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=241 Ping statistics for 64.233.167.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 47ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elinvesti8 Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and Settingsuser>Ping google.com -n 25 Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=237 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=237 Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 73ms What does this ping info reflect. Good.. Bad..??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Using Sprint EVDO Pinging google.com [64.233.187.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=236 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=236 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=236 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=236 Ping statistics for 64.233.187.99: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 160ms, Maximum = 165ms, Average = 163ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Here is a ping with my new connection. This is while uploading a video too so they may be lower if I wasn't doing anything. Ping statistics for 64.233.169.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 19ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siryak Posted June 28, 2007 CID Share Posted June 28, 2007 Waahoooo....hughes.net rocks... Pinging www.google.com [216.239.51.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=755ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=735ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=724ms TTL=238 Reply from 216.239.51.104: bytes=32 time=684ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 216.239.51.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 684ms, Maximum = 755ms, Average = 724ms I didn't think I would ever say this about pings like that but....Lucky! Pinging google.com [64.233.187.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=1208ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=1244ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=1337ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=1282ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 64.233.187.99: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1208ms, Maximum = 1337ms, Average = 1267ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.