Jump to content

hi people , this is my score


mistkron
 Share

Recommended Posts

well , hi im new to this testmy.net and i just tested my cable for the speed.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3153 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 748 KB)

Download Speed is:: 385 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 9:54 AM GMT

Bottom Line:: 56X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.66 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=CINUQYT4A

Im new and im not too sure if this is a good speed for .com.sg ( singapore )

does anyone think i should tweak it with the cablenut settings for better results ? will it slow me down if the settings is wrongly done ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, your connection should be almost double what you're getting.  :-|

Install the cablenut files https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=64

Aswell as these settings https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=101

Unzip the settings to C:ProgramCablenut after installing cablenut.

Open up Cablenut Adjuster, and click Load Custom Setting File, in the file section at the top.

browse to C:ProgramCablenutvanburens_cablenut_settings_version_2VanBurens cablenut settings Version 2WinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMSS1460

Double click on Cable & DSL 5000 768

Click save to registry, and restart your PC.

Try the test again, and post results.

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1708 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)

Download Speed is:: 208 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 10:45 AM GMT

Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.92 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=JOQ8Z0RKA

it became worst . but well is something wrong ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey mistkron and welcome to the forum :)

we need to find the correct MSS value for you

open cablenut adjuster, click delete cablenut tweaks and click save to registry and reboot, reboot your modem and router for 30 seconds too

now run this test http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks

copy result URL adress and paste it here so we can see it

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 331.12Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 237.55kb/s

------  Client System Details  ------

OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Full Duplex mode

Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 293.52 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

There were 4 packets retransmitted, 25 duplicate acks received, and 19 SACK blocks received

The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time.

  Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem

  Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering

Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch

    Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

Server says [218.212.244.24] but Client says [192.168.0.11]

-

WEB100 Kernel Variables:

Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

AckPktsIn: 114

AckPktsOut: 0

BytesRetrans: 5840

CongAvoid: 79

CongestionOverCount: 0

CongestionSignals: 3

CountRTT: 85

CurCwnd: 14600

CurMSS: 1460

CurRTO: 520

CurRwinRcvd: 17520

CurRwinSent: 5840

CurSsthresh: 4380

DSACKDups: 0

DataBytesIn: 0

DataBytesOut: 294920

DataPktsIn: 0

DataPktsOut: 202

DupAcksIn: 25

ECNEnabled: 0

FastRetran: 3

MaxCwnd: 14600

MaxMSS: 1460

MaxRTO: 910

MaxRTT: 460

MaxRwinRcvd: 17520

MaxRwinSent: 5840

MaxSsthresh: 5840

MinMSS: 1460

MinRTO: 490

MinRTT: 240

MinRwinRcvd: 17520

MinRwinSent: 5840

NagleEnabled: 1

OtherReductions: 0

PktsIn: 114

PktsOut: 202

PktsRetrans: 4

X_Rcvbuf: 103424

SACKEnabled: 3

SACKsRcvd: 19

SendStall: 0

SlowStart: 6

SampleRTT: 250

SmoothedRTT: 290

X_Sndbuf: 103424

SndLimTimeRwin: 0

SndLimTimeCwnd: 10139157

SndLimTimeSender: 4511

SndLimTransRwin: 0

SndLimTransCwnd: 1

SndLimTransSender: 1

SndLimBytesRwin: 0

SndLimBytesCwnd: 294920

SndLimBytesSender: 0

SubsequentTimeouts: 0

SumRTT: 24950

Timeouts: 0

TimestampsEnabled: 0

WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647

WinScaleSent: 2147483647

DupAcksOut: 0

StartTimeUsec: 699182

Duration: 10163407

c2sData: 2

c2sAck: 2

s2cData: 9

s2cAck: 2

Checking for mismatch condition

(cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0],

(PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.40>2], (estimate > 2) [0.31>2]

Checking for mismatch on uplink

(speed > 50 [0.23>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.33<5]

(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.01<.01]

Checking for excessive errors condition

(loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],

(loss < .01) [0.01<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0]

Checking for 10 Mbps link

(speed < 9.5) [0.23<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.23>3.0]

(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.33<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.01<.01], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for Wireless link

(sendtime = 0) [4.44=0], (speed < 5) [0.23<5]

(Estimate > 50 [0.31>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]

(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

(speed < 2) [0.23<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

(SendTime = 0) [4.4471092705321194E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for half-duplex condition

(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],

(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10]

Checking for congestion

(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

(MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0]

bw = 0.31 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 293.52msec, and loss = 0.014851485379040241

The theoretical network limit is 0.31 Mbps

The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.68 Mbps

Your receive buffer (17.0 KByte) limits the application to 0.45 Mbps

The network based flow control limits the application to 0.37 Mbps

Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1'

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have some re transmissions so the route is probl not the best, but try this

download this attached file, unzip it to C:ProgramCablenut

open cablenut, in top left corner, click file, click load custom setting, browse to C:ProgramCablenut and dubble click on the file you unzipped

now click save to registry and reboot, also reboot modem for 30 seconds

make a new tweaktest and post result URL, and make a speedtest up and down

good luck

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:10fc33?service=cable&speed=6500&os=winXP&via=normal

*

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1600 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB)

Download Speed is:: 195 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 11:59 AM GMT

Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.25 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=2ZDC8LK0J

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 217 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB)

Upload Speed is:: 27 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 11:59 AM GMT

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB download in 37.93 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=25FM4ZNIH

Link to post
Share on other sites

xp2 is installed on xp if you use the windows update feature. It is not necassary unless you REALY care about security... It has tons of added features to help keep it "secure" but i personaly (along with millions of others,lol)  do not like it one bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sp2 is horrible..why would you reccomend it..

Thats a myth, im using SP2 and pull 9.2 Mbps all the way from Sweden  ;)

http://www.dslnuts.com/

quote" Microsoft has updated the TCP/IP to include AFDParameters from the IPv4 and wont read TcpWindowSize correctley in most analyzers, what this means is that the only tool that will tweak correctley at this point is the Cablenut program. As we get more information we willl post it.

Here are the comments and link to Mnosteeles news thread.

http://www.broadbandnuts.com/index.php?board=4;action=display;threadid=3126

If you have additional info on the changes feel free to add to that thread..

This is also effected in all flavors of Windows 2003 server.

Quote:

by Mnosteele

Well it

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) I am also one that believes that SP2 causes problems for many ppl, there was a lot of press in the beginning about this but later it was written that the problems have been solved, Its funny to me that cable nut writes about the benefits of a "tweak" that ppl had been doing b4 SP2,... although I believe that all the problems with SP2 can be solved, for a person that is computer savvy,...... what about the general population that just wants to install something and not have to mess with it? Of course I don't think Sp2 causes irreparable damage to a system, I just don't see a great advantage either.As with so many issues with computers or any thing....... there are always at least two sides of the issue, each computer user must make a decision as to which way to go, I do know that there wasn't all this discussion when Sp1 came out. No matter which way a user goes I believe that if the proper steps are taken it is p[possible to do your Internet browsing with or without Sp1 or Sp2, the only 100% guaranteed security for any computer is to lock it up in a closet and your security can be assured. The only problem is you cant use it, as with any decision I make I listen to both sides and make my choice, and if after a time I make another decision to change again I do.Thats why I'm glad I still have the freedom of choice even if I'm wrong, so flip a coin, talk to your friends and family, talk to your computer "specialist" and then decide..... remember ya can always change your mind at a later date. I have found it interesting that Sp2 has a built in feature to turn it off when it encounters a problem running something.For now I'm still running Sp1 until I think its time to change...

8) Microwave

Link to post
Share on other sites

well seems like this thread got pretty far , anyway VanBuren this are my results after sp2 is installed.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1685 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB)

Download Speed is:: 206 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 16:20:26 UTC+0800 2005

Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.97 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-IDEUOX9C5

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 219 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB)

Upload Speed is:: 27 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 16:20:46 UTC+0800 2005

Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 37.93 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-EJ6BXIHPO

-

http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:3f3995a?service=cable&speed=6500&os=winXP&via=normal

-

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 418.42Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 357.17kb/s

------  Client System Details  ------

OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Full Duplex mode

Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 281.09 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

There were 3 packets retransmitted, 35 duplicate acks received, and 29 SACK blocks received

The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time.

  Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem

  Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering

    Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

Server says [218.212.244.24] but Client says [192.168.0.11]

-

WEB100 Kernel Variables:

Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

AckPktsIn: 167

AckPktsOut: 0

BytesRetrans: 4380

CongAvoid: 117

CongestionOverCount: 0

CongestionSignals: 2

CountRTT: 128

CurCwnd: 11680

CurMSS: 1460

CurRTO: 530

CurRwinRcvd: 768000

CurRwinSent: 5840

CurSsthresh: 5840

DSACKDups: 0

DataBytesIn: 0

DataBytesOut: 456980

DataPktsIn: 0

DataPktsOut: 313

DupAcksIn: 35

ECNEnabled: 0

FastRetran: 2

MaxCwnd: 18980

MaxMSS: 1460

MaxRTO: 930

MaxRTT: 430

MaxRwinRcvd: 768000

MaxRwinSent: 5840

MaxSsthresh: 8760

MinMSS: 1460

MinRTO: 490

MinRTT: 240

MinRwinRcvd: 48000

MinRwinSent: 5840

NagleEnabled: 1

OtherReductions: 0

PktsIn: 167

PktsOut: 313

PktsRetrans: 3

X_Rcvbuf: 103424

SACKEnabled: 3

SACKsRcvd: 29

SendStall: 0

SlowStart: 6

SampleRTT: 290

SmoothedRTT: 290

X_Sndbuf: 103424

SndLimTimeRwin: 0

SndLimTimeCwnd: 10216982

SndLimTimeSender: 4547

SndLimTransRwin: 0

SndLimTransCwnd: 1

SndLimTransSender: 1

SndLimBytesRwin: 0

SndLimBytesCwnd: 456980

SndLimBytesSender: 0

SubsequentTimeouts: 0

SumRTT: 35980

Timeouts: 0

TimestampsEnabled: 0

WinScaleRcvd: 4

WinScaleSent: 7

DupAcksOut: 0

StartTimeUsec: 245871

Duration: 10240585

c2sData: 2

c2sAck: 2

s2cData: 9

s2cAck: 2

Checking for mismatch condition

(cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0],

(PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.30>2], (estimate > 2) [0.49>2]

Checking for mismatch on uplink

(speed > 50 [0.35>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.41<5]

(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01]

Checking for excessive errors condition

(loss/sec > .15) [6.38>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],

(loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0]

Checking for 10 Mbps link

(speed < 9.5) [0.35<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.35>3.0]

(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.41<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for Wireless link

(sendtime = 0) [4.44=0], (speed < 5) [0.35<5]

(Estimate > 50 [0.49>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]

(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

(speed < 2) [0.35<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

(SendTime = 0) [4.448453846777718E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0]

Checking for half-duplex condition

(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],

(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10]

Checking for congestion

(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

(MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0]

bw = 0.49 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 281.09msec, and loss = 0.00638977624475956

The theoretical network limit is 0.49 Mbps

The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.80 Mbps

Your receive buffer (750.0 KByte) limits the application to 20.84 Mbps

The network based flow control limits the application to 0.51 Mbps

Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1'

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the above results were from using the Cable & DSL 6000 768 setting you gave me.

-

i tried fiddling with another setting file which is the Cable & DSL 2048 1024 , and it seems like its  pretty fine for my connection quite a bit too . but well Im still hearing from ya for new solutions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...