Jump to content

Bye Bye Hughes net, you SUCK


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure what rev means. I am having trouble playing online though?

"If you leave an area with Mobile Broadband 1x EV-DO coverage, and enter an area with 1xRTT coverage, the handover is seamless. You will notice the coverage icon will change from DO to 1X, and the speed will drop from Mobile Broadband speeds, to 1xRTT speeds." from

http://www.fklt.com/faq.php#1.2.4

After checking it seems that your not in an EVDO A area and will probably only experience slower speeds, but steady and no FAP. Also the CDU550 does not have the functionality for connecting a high gain antenna to it.Your problem may be that your only getting 1xRTT speed. :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

"If you leave an area with Mobile Broadband 1x EV-DO coverage, and enter an area with 1xRTT coverage, the handover is seamless. You will notice the coverage icon will change from DO to 1X, and the speed will drop from Mobile Broadband speeds, to 1xRTT speeds." from

http://www.fklt.com/faq.php#1.2.4

Hey granpa would it say EV instead of DO?? On my blackberry ill say 1XEV then when i get out of the EVDO area ill go down to 1X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pinging google.com [64.233.187.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=242

Request timed out.

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=467ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=211ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=303ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=242

Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=242

Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 64.233.187.99:

    Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 23, Lost = 2 (8% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 211ms, Maximum = 467ms, Average = 279ms

These are my ping times. do they look decent for EVDO?

And my speed is still pretty much the same.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 415 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)

Download Speed is:: 51 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 3:02pm

Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 20.08 sec

Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 20.016 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (113.157)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FWPQ9D4G6

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 [!]

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Upload Connection is:: 79 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 10 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 3:04pm

Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 102.4 sec

Tested from a 386 kB file and took 40.094 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (113.157)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZE61YHKAP

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 [!]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is real EVDO

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Upload Connection is:: 942 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 115 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:24pm

Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.9 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.007 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 284.49 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X809E5Y3O

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 [!]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is real EVDO

::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::

Upload Connection is:: 942 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 115 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:24pm

Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.9 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.007 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 284.49 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X809E5Y3O

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9

Damn granpa thats the slowest i think i ever seen you run

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well over 50 years  :smiley:

oh, the EVDO, about 6 weeks of experimenting and firmware for the router. But now it just seems to improve on it's own by using the same tower. Could be it also picked up a little since the leaves fell. :lipsrsealed:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 11460 Kbps about 11.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1399 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:51pm

Bottom Line:: 200X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.73 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.692 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.14 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QETL9YRIF

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 [!]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well over 50 years  :smiley:

oh, the EVDO, about 6 weeks of experimenting and firmware for the router. But now it just seems to improve on it's own by using the same tower. Could be it also picked up a little since the leaves fell. :lipsrsealed:

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 11460 Kbps about 11.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1399 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:51pm

Bottom Line:: 200X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.73 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.692 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.14 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QETL9YRIF

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9

Thats a cache test

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...