Jump to content

Pictures load in pieces and slow


sharky2009

Recommended Posts

1. What OS are you running?

MS Windows XP Home SP3

Intel Pentium 4 CPU 2.80GHz, 512MB RAM, Intel 82865G Graphics Controller

2. Who your Internet Service Provider (ISP) is, and what the advertised speed for download/upload is?

Verizon Fios 20/5

3. What tweaking programs you already have installed, and run this test.  Copy all text and paste it in your post! For security reasons, blank out your IP #.

CableNut and TCPOptimizer. Results of test:  http://www.dslreports.com/tweakr/block:25807d6?service=fiber&speed=&os=winXP&via=normal

Personal Message (Offline)

[sTICKY] STOP! Before you post your problems read this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That one?

4. What speed do you have against https://testmy.net and http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ also download this Tracert and Ping program (made by php) and click on check.bat.  When it's done, copy and paste the results in your post.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 19677 Kbps about 19.7 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2402 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/02/05 - 10:11am

Bottom Line:: 343X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.43 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.658 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 242.27 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M0Z9I4WST

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one?

4. What speed do you have against https://testmy.net and http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ also download this Tracert and Ping program (made by php) and click on check.bat.  When it's done, copy and paste the results in your post.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 19677 Kbps about 19.7 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2402 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/02/05 - 10:11am

Bottom Line:: 343X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.43 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.658 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 242.27 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M0Z9I4WST

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 [!]

I guess I should have looked at it, instead of skimming it :idiot2:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey sharky2009  have you tried a different browser ?  Just so we can locate the issue.

When you say a different browser, I hate using IE7 but I do have it on my system.  Here is a speed test using IE7...

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 13737 Kbps about 13.7 Mbps (tested with 12288 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1677 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/02/07 - 10:40am

Bottom Line:: 240X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.61 sec

Tested from a 12288 kB file and took 7.328 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 138.86 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6H0W8PQUG

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]

Compared to a speed test from Firefox....

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 19931 Kbps about 19.9 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2433 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/02/07 - 10:41am

Bottom Line:: 348X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.42 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 10.522 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 246.57 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GBMSJ4KE0

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 [!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it matter where ie: what website you visit , that the pictures load slow ?

It doesn't matter.  Funny thing about it is that it didn't used to always happen.  I frequent Realgm.com and NBA.com and they used to popup immediately, but now it's like when I go to those sites my system seems to wait for a full second as if it is opening something then I start receiving data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter.  Funny thing about it is that it didn't used to always happen.  I frequent Realgm.com and NBA.com and they used to popup immediately, but now it's like when I go to those sites my system seems to wait for a full second as if it is opening something then I start receiving data.

I payed a visit to both sites, and there is a hesitation on my end as well, for instance, goto cnn.com , it's loading so slow it's sick, tell me how slow or fast yours is there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I payed a visit to both sites, and there is a hesitation on my end as well, for instance, goto cnn.com , it's loading so slow it's sick, tell me how slow or fast yours is there.

Using Stopwatch, cnn took me 4.87 seconds.

nba.com took me 3.432 seconds

realgm.com took me 1.655 seconds.

Before though, these sites would pop up automatically in what felt like less than 1/10 of a second.

Stopwatch is located at http://www.numion.com/StopWatch/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do use Spybot and have scanned. I also use SuperAntispyware Free.

So things are slow enough where you know it's not just busy servers, and that there must be an issue somewhere ?  Because your download speed is good.

  Ping testmy.net, and post your results, while your at it, do a trace route as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So things are slow enough where you know it's not just busy servers, and that there must be an issue somewhere ?  Because your download speed is good.

  Ping testmy.net, and post your results, while your at it, do a trace route as well.

Here is my ping result:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:>ping testmy.net

Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=48

Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=48

Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=48

Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 54ms

...and here is my tracert:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:>tracert testmy.net

Tracing route to testmy.net [74.54.226.166]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1

  2    8 ms    9 ms    8 ms  L100.VFTTP-09.NWRKNJ.verizon-gni.net [72.76.31.1

]

  3    8 ms    7 ms    7 ms  P3-0.LCR-01.NWRKNJ.verizon-gni.net [130.81.38.18

8]

  4    8 ms    7 ms    7 ms  130.81.29.188

  5    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  130.81.17.6

  6  215 ms    11 ms    12 ms  so-6-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.NY111.verizon-gni.net [130.

81.17.129]

  7    11 ms    19 ms    12 ms  so-0-3-1.mpr2.lga5.us.above.net [64.125.13.33]

  8    22 ms    22 ms    22 ms  so-0-2-0.mpr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.26.105]

  9    58 ms    59 ms    59 ms  so-1-0-0.mpr4.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.28.50]

10    58 ms    84 ms    59 ms  xe-1-1-0.er2.iah1.above.net [64.125.26.226]

11    60 ms    62 ms    59 ms  xe-0-0-0.er1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.26.217]

12    55 ms    55 ms    54 ms  209.66.99.94.available.above.net [209.66.99.94]

13    58 ms    56 ms    57 ms  et5-4.ibr04.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.53]

14    57 ms    54 ms    54 ms  te7-2.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.10]

15    54 ms    54 ms    54 ms  te1-4.dsr01.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.87.253.114

]

16    56 ms    69 ms    55 ms  po1.car06.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.8]

17    54 ms    55 ms    54 ms  a6.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.166]

Trace complete.

C:>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm stumped. Wonder if your video card is suffering, doesn't make sense though,  To be continued in the AM............

You have me thinking here...regarding my video card.

I did some upgrades using DriverMax and I have noticed some videos quality have not been up to par.  Is there any way to confirm or check my video card or reverse or do something to correct/possibly fix or check it out?

Really sorry for all the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to get into that just yet, first I suggest you turn on DMA if not already done so, do this via control panel, system, hardware, device manager. Doubleclick on IDE ATA/ATAPI Controllers, Second Tab. There you'll see what DMA setting Windows XP is using.

I have the following:

Device 0

Device Type:  Auto Detection

Transfer Mode:  DMA if available

Current Transfer Mode:  Ultra DMA Mode 5

Device 1

Device Type:  Auto Detection

Transfer Mode:  DMA if Available

Current Transfer Mode:  Not Applicable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...