RR Premium Help.....

[Bwalker25]

I did VanB's tweaks and I ran a batch file that I found in another post... and here is what I got

my dl before I re-installed my OS was dead on 7.8Mbps and closer to 7.9...Now I get only 7.5 and that is good considering what I was getting later last night (only 7.35mbps)

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 7541 Kbps about 7.5 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 920 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 09:15:42 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 135X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.11 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 86.66 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-D4VAKJHO9

My upload is almost perfect! (close enough for me)

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 496 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 09:17:54 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 16.79 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 71.03 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T1OGDN3BV

The current date is: Sun 10/02/2005

The current time is:  9:11:35.51

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=48

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=48

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=48

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms

Ping Complete.

Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    6 ms    5 ms    6 ms  10.72.160.1

  2    8 ms    7 ms    6 ms  pos0-1.rlghnca-rtr1.nc.rr.com [24.25.1.157]

  3    7 ms    5 ms    5 ms  pos14-0.rlghncrdc-rtr1.nc.rr.com [24.25.0.5]

  4    6 ms    7 ms    7 ms  son1-0-1.rlghncrdc-rtr3.nc.rr.com [24.93.64.9]

  5    23 ms    22 ms    21 ms  so-8-1.car1.Washington1.Level3.net [67.29.172.5]

  6    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms  ae-2-52.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121.33]

  7    41 ms    42 ms    64 ms  ae-0-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.109]

  8    42 ms    41 ms    41 ms  ge-1-1-51.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.6]

  9    44 ms    45 ms    44 ms  4.78.220.10

10    45 ms    44 ms    46 ms  vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30]

11    46 ms    46 ms    46 ms  dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]

12    45 ms    47 ms    46 ms  gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69]

13    45 ms    46 ms    46 ms  85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]

Trace complete.

I went to http://nitro.ucsc.edu and did there test, and it says "Other Network Traffic is Congesting the Link"  I have run that test multiple times sinse yesterday and can't get better than 7.13Mbps....Can someone help me?  Is it possible RR can be faster than the cap?  I just want my 7.8 or 7.9 speeds back!   Thanks for all the help

[Bwalker25]

I know sometimes everyone wants to see the below stuff, so I went ahead and did it   not sure at all what it all means, but here ya go!

WEB100 Kernel Variables:

Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

AckPktsIn: 2221

AckPktsOut: 0

BytesRetrans: 59860

CongAvoid: 1517

CongestionOverCount: 0

CongestionSignals: 1

CountRTT: 1778

CurCwnd: 160600

CurMSS: 1460

CurRTO: 380

CurRwinRcvd: 921600

CurRwinSent: 16304

CurSsthresh: 138700

DSACKDups: 0

DataBytesIn: 0

DataBytesOut: 8965860

DataPktsIn: 0

DataPktsOut: 6141

DupAcksIn: 423

ECNEnabled: 0

FastRetran: 1

MaxCwnd: 278860

MaxMSS: 1460

MaxRTO: 430

MaxRTT: 230

MaxRwinRcvd: 921600

MaxRwinSent: 16304

MaxSsthresh: 138700

MinMSS: 1460

MinRTO: 290

MinRTT: 90

MinRwinRcvd: 57600

MinRwinSent: 16304

NagleEnabled: 1

OtherReductions: 4

PktsIn: 2222

PktsOut: 6141

PktsRetrans: 41

X_Rcvbuf: 103424

RcvWinScale: 7

SACKEnabled: 3

SACKsRcvd: 198

SendStall: 0

SlowStart: 260

SampleRTT: 160

SmoothedRTT: 160

X_Sndbuf: 103424

SndWinScale: 4

SndLimTimeRwin: 0

SndLimTimeCwnd: 10028885

SndLimTimeSender: 2855

SndLimTransRwin: 0

SndLimTransCwnd: 1

SndLimTransSender: 1

SndLimBytesRwin: 0

SndLimBytesCwnd: 8965860

SndLimBytesSender: 0

SubsequentTimeouts: 0

SumRTT: 266250

Timeouts: 0

TimestampsEnabled: 0

WinScaleRcvd: 4

WinScaleSent: 7

DupAcksOut: 0

StartTimeUsec: 857801

Duration: 10035906

c2sData: 2

c2sAck: 2

s2cData: 9

s2cAck: 3

half_duplex: 1

link: 0

congestion: 1

bad_cable: 0

mismatch: 0

spd: 0.00

bw: 5.83

loss: 0.000162840

avgrtt: 149.75

waitsec: 0.00

timesec: 10.00

order: 0.1905

rwintime: 0.0000

sendtime: 0.0003

cwndtime: 0.9997

rwin: 7.0312

swin: 64.0000

cwin: 2.1275

rttsec: 0.149747

Sndbuf: 8388608

aspd: 14.69186

Checking for mismatch on uplink

(speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.53<5]

(rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [1.62<.01]

Checking for excessive errors condition

(loss/sec > .15) [1.62>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],

(loss < .01) [1.62<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [138700>0]

Checking for 10 Mbps link

(speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]

(xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.53<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.62<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for Wireless link

(sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]

(Estimate > 50 [5.83>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]

(RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

(speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

(SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

Checking for half-duplex condition

(rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],

(SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]

Checking for congestion

(cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

(MaxSsthresh > 0) [138700>0]

estimate = 5.83 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 149.75msec, and loss = 1.6284E-4

The theoretical network limit is 5.83 Mbps

The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 427.38 Mbps

Your PC/Workstation has a 900.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 46.95 Mbps

The network based flow control limits the throughput to 14.20 Mbps

Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'

-------------

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 534.93Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 7.04Mb/s

------  Client System Details  ------

OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_04

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Half Duplex mode

Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 149.75 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

There were 41 packets retransmitted, 423 duplicate acks received, and 198 SACK blocks received

The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time.

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

Server says [24.163.xxxx.223] but Client says [192.168.15.100]

[VanBuren]

try loading version 7 of the tweaks i made, and use the Cable & DSL 6000 512.ccs

VanBuren

[Bwalker25]

alright I loaded the 8000/800 one and it took my speeds WAY down

Before (using 8000/800 settings)

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4768 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 582 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 12:24:24 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.76 sec

Diagnosis: Looks Great : 18.02 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3GVH7N9AX

I will load the 6000 one and see if I can get back up to my 8Mbps rate...thanks Van for your help so far I will post when I get the settings applied

After 6000 VanB Settings in Cable Nut

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 6909 Kbps about 6.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 843 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 15:17:26 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 123X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.21 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 71.06 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N926EUDZ1

Any way to get this up to 7.8 or 7.9Mbps?  Should I call time warner?

[VanBuren]

if you have a router, try bypass it and connect direct to modem via ethernet.

when using a router set your NIC to 100 Mbps full duplex and when your connecting direct to modem, test 10 Mbps half and compare

VanBuren

[FallowEarth]

If you are directly connected to the modem with slow speeds, you can try to reset your TCP/IP.

For WIN XP:

-click start

-click run

-type: cmd

-click ok

-type: netsh int ip reset resetlog.txt

-hit enter and wait for it to finish (it will bring up another command line)

-restart your PC

You can also restore your IE 6:

-open Internet Explorer, click Tools, click Internet Options

-under the General tab:

[Bwalker25]

Connection is:: 8009 Kbps about 8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 978 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 21:51:15 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 143X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.05 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 98.44 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F6WJ9RI32

Right now its all good, I did the above and restarted, and did what Van said too,  Thats the fastest it has ever been and the scary part is it was even faster it tested out at 8.2MBps over 1mb downloading everysecond

Thanks for all the help, maybe twc is upgrading after all?

[x_6985381]

Damn i want that kinda speed >=O

[Bwalker25]

it just gets better....

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 8762 Kbps about 8.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1070 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Sun Oct 2 21:59:39 UTC+0200 2005

Bottom Line:: 156X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.96 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 117.1 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SPOWBCEIM

[FallowEarth]

Beautiful

[JustinOhioRR]

Damn,, nice...

I wish reg RR went over cap that much, im at 5, thats it.....i ONCE in a whiel hit 5.1 or 5.2.....

ahh well, your paying $80 a month, not me.

[Bwalker25]

i pay just 20$ extra for the service, my bill is for cable and rr is only 120$....not bad but could be better (they need to lower there prices!)